Suppr超能文献

胆宁与α受体阻滞剂联合治疗肾绞痛合并下段输尿管结石的排石效果及安全性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Efficacy and Safety of Boldine Combined with and in Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones with Renal Colic: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Department of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 5;60(9):1455. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091455.

Abstract

: This study aimed to compare the effects and safety of boldine combined with and plus tamsulosin vs. tamsulosin alone in medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteral calculi. : This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 159 renal colic patients with distal ureteric stones (≤10 mm). Patients aged between 18 and 70 years or older with distal ureteral (below the sacroiliac joint) stones ≤10 mm (defined by the largest diameter in three planes) confirmed by urinary ultrasonography and/or native computed tomography (CT). Patients were divided into two groups: A and B. Patients in Group A received tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus boldine combined with and , while those in Group B received tamsulosin 0.4 mg. The rate of stone expulsion, duration of stone expulsion, the dose and the duration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesic use, and adverse effects of drugs were recorded. : No differences were reported in demographic profiles between the two groups. The stone expulsion rate in Group A (84.8%) was higher in comparison to Group B (52.5%); the mean time of stone expulsion was 16.33 ± 4.75 days in Group A and 19.33 ± 6.42 days in Group B. The mean requirement time of analgesia was significantly less in Group A, 2.42 ± 2.56, than in Group B, 6.25 ± 3.05. Drug-related adverse effects (headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, postural hypotension, backache, and running nose) were comparable between the two groups. : Tamsulosin plus boldine combined with and as medical expulsion therapy is more effective for distal ureteric stones with less need for analgesics and a shorter stone expulsion time than tamsulosin alone.

摘要

这项研究旨在比较与坦索罗辛单独治疗相比,博丁联合坦索罗辛和用于医学排石疗法(MET)治疗输尿管下段结石的效果和安全性。

这是一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入 159 例肾绞痛伴输尿管下段结石(≤10mm)患者。纳入标准为:年龄 18-70 岁或以上;经尿路超声和/或泌尿系 CT 确诊为输尿管下段结石(骶髂关节以下),结石大小≤10mm(定义为三个平面中最大直径);接受博丁联合坦索罗辛和用于 MET 治疗的患者纳入观察组(A 组),接受坦索罗辛 0.4mg 治疗的患者纳入对照组(B 组)。记录两组患者的结石排净率、排石时间、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)用量和使用时间、止痛药用量和药物不良反应发生率。

两组患者的一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义。A 组结石排净率(84.8%)高于 B 组(52.5%),排石时间[(16.33±4.75)天]短于 B 组[(19.33±6.42)天],止痛药物使用时间[(2.42±2.56)天]短于 B 组[(6.25±3.05)天]。两组患者的药物不良反应(头痛、头晕、恶心、呕吐、体位性低血压、腰痛和流鼻涕)发生率比较,差异无统计学意义。

博丁联合坦索罗辛和用于 MET 治疗输尿管下段结石较坦索罗辛单独治疗更有效,排石时间更短,止痛药物使用时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bee2/11434311/f18b542491f7/medicina-60-01455-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验