文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

颈椎后路椎间孔切开术后活动范围丧失的术前因素。

Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 13;60(9):1496. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091496.


DOI:10.3390/medicina60091496
PMID:39336537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11433765/
Abstract

Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) aims to resolve cervical radiculopathy while preserving range of motion (ROM). However, its effectiveness in maintaining ROM is uncertain. This study investigates the changes in ROM after PCF and identifies preoperative factors that influence ROM reduction post surgery. This retrospective cohort study included patients treated at our hospital from August 2016 to September 2021. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological outcomes included the segmental angle (SA), cervical angle (CA), C2-C7 SVA, Pfirrmann grade, extent of facetectomy, foraminal stenosis, and ROM. Patients were categorized into two groups based on segmental ROM changes: decreased (Group D) and maintained (Group M). Radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for ROM loss after PCF. 76 patients were included: 34 in Group D and 42 in Group M, with no demographic differences. Preoperatively, Group D had significantly larger flexion segmental and cervical angles than Group M (segmental, < 0.001; cervical, = 0.001). Group D also had a higher Pfirrmann grade ( = 0.014) and more bony bridge formations ( = 0.004). While no significant differences were observed in arm pain VAS and NDI scores, Group D exhibited worse neck pain VAS at the last follow-up ( = 0.03). Univariate linear regression indicated that preoperative segmental ROM ( < 0.001, B = 0.82) and bony bridge formation ( = 0.046, B = 5.33) were significant predictors of ROM loss post PCF. Patients with higher preoperative flexion angles and Pfirrmann grades at the operative level are at an increased risk for ROM loss and neck pain and often exhibit bony bridge formation. Accounting for these factors can improve surgical planning and patient outcomes.

摘要

后路颈椎侧块切开术 (PCF) 旨在解决颈椎神经根病,同时保持活动范围 (ROM)。然而,其维持 ROM 的效果尚不确定。本研究调查了 PCF 后 ROM 的变化,并确定了影响术后 ROM 减少的术前因素。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2016 年 8 月至 2021 年 9 月在我院接受治疗的患者。使用颈部和手臂疼痛视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 和颈部残疾指数 (NDI) 评估临床结果。影像学结果包括节段角 (SA)、颈椎角 (CA)、C2-C7 SVA、Pfirrmann 分级、关节突切除术范围、侧块狭窄和 ROM。根据节段 ROM 变化将患者分为两组:减少组 (Group D) 和保持组 (Group M)。比较两组之间的影像学和临床结果。进行单变量和多变量回归分析,以确定 PCF 后 ROM 丧失的危险因素。纳入 76 例患者:34 例在 Group D,42 例在 Group M,两组在人口统计学上无差异。术前,Group D 的颈椎前屈节段角和颈椎角均大于 Group M(节段角, < 0.001;颈椎角, = 0.001)。Group D 的 Pfirrmann 分级也更高( = 0.014),骨桥形成更多( = 0.004)。手臂疼痛 VAS 和 NDI 评分无显著差异,但 Group D 末次随访时颈部疼痛 VAS 更差( = 0.03)。单变量线性回归表明,术前节段 ROM( < 0.001,B = 0.82)和骨桥形成( = 0.046,B = 5.33)是 PCF 后 ROM 丢失的显著预测因素。术前手术节段屈伸角度和 Pfirrmann 分级较高的患者 ROM 丢失和颈部疼痛的风险增加,且常伴有骨桥形成。考虑到这些因素可以改善手术计划和患者结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/a8a640cf242c/medicina-60-01496-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/bcff0e5b1212/medicina-60-01496-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/7357ae476fc9/medicina-60-01496-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/b275749ce80a/medicina-60-01496-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/a8a640cf242c/medicina-60-01496-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/bcff0e5b1212/medicina-60-01496-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/7357ae476fc9/medicina-60-01496-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/b275749ce80a/medicina-60-01496-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/11433765/a8a640cf242c/medicina-60-01496-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024-9-13

[2]
Does the Neck Pain, Function, or Range of Motion Differ After Anterior Cervical Fusion, Cervical Disc Replacement, and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy?

World Neurosurg. 2019-5-29

[3]
Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.

Pain Physician. 2018-5

[4]
Multilevel posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty versus laminoplasty alone for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with radiculopathy: a comparative study.

Spine J. 2017-9-4

[5]
Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.

Spine J. 2014-10-1

[6]
Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2018-10

[7]
Predictable factors for aggravation of cervical alignment after posterior cervical foraminotomy.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2022-10-7

[8]
Can segmental mobility be increased by cervical arthroplasty?

Neurosurg Focus. 2017-2

[9]
The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement.

Spine J. 2010-5-23

[10]
Comparing outcomes between anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Spine J. 2024-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
Update of the Natural History, Pathophysiology, and Treatment Strategies of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Narrative Review.

Asian Spine J. 2023-2

[2]
Predictable factors for aggravation of cervical alignment after posterior cervical foraminotomy.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2022-10-7

[3]
Unilateral Cervical Facet Fractures: Relevance of Acute Disc Injury in Conservative Treatment Failure.

Asian Spine J. 2023-2

[4]
Foraminal Restenosis After Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.

Global Spine J. 2023-10

[5]
In Vitro Biomechanics of Human Cadaveric Cervical Spines With Mature Fusion.

Int J Spine Surg. 2021-10

[6]
Correlation between kinematic sagittal parameters of the cervical lordosis or head posture and disc degeneration in patients with posterior neck pain.

Open Med (Wars). 2021-1-22

[7]
Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions.

Neurospine. 2020-9

[8]
Comparison of outcomes following minimally invasive and open posterior cervical foraminotomy: description of minimally invasive technique and review of literature.

J Spine Surg. 2020-3

[9]
Comparison of Surgical Results between Soft Ruptured Disc and Foraminal Stenosis Patients in Posterior Cervical Laminoforaminotomy.

Korean J Neurotrauma. 2017-10

[10]
The Predictable Factors of the Postoperative Kyphotic Change of Sagittal Alignment of the Cervical Spine after the Laminoplasty.

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索