• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术和显微椎间盘切除术术后的并发症、结局及融合需求

Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.

作者信息

Skovrlj Branko, Gologorsky Yakov, Haque Raqeeb, Fessler Richard G, Qureshi Sheeraz A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, Box 1136, New York, NY 10128, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 2210, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.048. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.048
PMID:24486472
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) with or without microdiscectomy (posterior cervical discectomy [PCD]) is a frequently used surgical technique for cervical radiculopathy secondary to foraminal stenosis or a laterally located herniated disc. Currently, these procedures are being performed with increasing frequency using advanced minimally invasive techniques. Although the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive PCF/PCD (MI-PCF/PCD) have been established, reports on long-term outcome and need for secondary surgical intervention at the index or adjacent level are lacking.

PURPOSE

To determine the rates of complications, long-term outcomes, and need for secondary surgical intervention at the index or adjacent level after MI-PCF and microdiscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Seventy patients treated with MI-PCF and/or MI-PCD for cervical radiculopathy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual Analog Scale for neck/arm (VASN/A) pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI).

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients underwent MI-PCF with or without MI-PCD between 2002 and 2011. Adequate prospective follow-up was available for 70 patients (95 cervical levels). The primary outcome assessed was need for secondary surgical intervention at the index or adjacent level. The secondary outcomes assessed included complications and improvements in NDI and VASN/A scores. All complications were reviewed. Mixed-model analyses of variance with random subject effects and autoregressive first-order correlation structures were used to test for differences among NDI, VASA, and VASN measurements made over time while accounting for the correlation among repeated observations within a patient. All statistical hypothesis tests were conducted at the 5% level of significance.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for a mean of 32.1 months. Of 70 patients operated, there were 3 (4.3%) complications (1 cerebrospinal fluid leak, 1 postoperative wound hematoma, and 1 radiculitis), none of which required a secondary operative intervention. Five patients required an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (eight total levels fused) on average 44.4 months after the index surgery. Of those, five (5.3%) were at the index level and three (2.1%) were at adjacent levels. Neck Disability Index scores improved significantly (p<.0001) immediately postoperatively and continued to decrease gradually with time. Visual Analog Scale for neck/arm scores improved significantly (p<.0001) from baseline immediately postoperatively but tended to plateau with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive PCF with or without MI-PCD is an excellent alternative for cervical radiculopathy secondary to foraminal stenosis or a laterally located herniated disc. There is a low rate (1.1% per index level per year) of future index site fusion and a very low rate (0.9% per adjacent level per year) of adjacent-level disease requiring surgery.

摘要

背景

后路颈椎椎间孔切开术(PCF)联合或不联合显微椎间盘切除术(后路颈椎椎间盘切除术[PCD])是治疗因椎间孔狭窄或外侧型椎间盘突出继发的神经根型颈椎病常用的手术技术。目前,这些手术越来越多地采用先进的微创技术进行。虽然微创PCF/PCD(MI-PCF/PCD)的安全性和有效性已得到证实,但缺乏关于长期疗效以及在初次手术节段或相邻节段进行二次手术干预必要性的报道。

目的

确定MI-PCF和显微椎间盘切除术后并发症发生率、长期疗效以及在初次手术节段或相邻节段进行二次手术干预的必要性。

研究设计

对前瞻性队列进行回顾性分析。

患者样本

70例因神经根型颈椎病接受MI-PCF和/或MI-PCD治疗的患者。

观察指标

颈部/手臂视觉模拟评分(VASN/A)疼痛和颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)。

方法

2002年至2011年期间,97例患者接受了MI-PCF联合或不联合MI-PCD治疗。70例患者(95个颈椎节段)有充分的前瞻性随访资料。评估的主要结局是在初次手术节段或相邻节段进行二次手术干预的必要性。评估的次要结局包括并发症以及NDI和VASN/A评分的改善情况。对所有并发症进行了回顾。采用具有随机受试者效应和自回归一阶相关结构的混合模型方差分析,以检验不同时间点NDI、VASA和VASN测量值之间的差异,同时考虑患者内重复观察值之间的相关性。所有统计假设检验均在5%的显著性水平上进行。

结果

患者平均随访32.1个月。70例接受手术的患者中有3例(4.3%)出现并发症(1例脑脊液漏、1例术后伤口血肿和1例神经根炎),均无需二次手术干预。5例患者在初次手术后平均44.4个月需要进行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(共融合8个节段)。其中,5例(5.3%)在初次手术节段,3例(2.1%)在相邻节段。颈部功能障碍指数评分术后立即显著改善(p<0.0001),并随时间逐渐下降。颈部/手臂视觉模拟评分术后立即较基线显著改善(p<0.0001),但随时间趋于平稳。

结论

微创PCF联合或不联合MI-PCD是治疗因椎间孔狭窄或外侧型椎间盘突出继发的神经根型颈椎病的极佳选择。未来初次手术节段融合率较低(每年每个初次手术节段1.1%),相邻节段需要手术治疗的疾病发生率极低(每年每个相邻节段0.9%)。

相似文献

1
Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术和显微椎间盘切除术术后的并发症、结局及融合需求
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.048. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
2
Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study.采用管道进行微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术以防止不必要的融合:一项长期随访研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct;29(4):358-364. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.SPINE171003. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
3
Comparing outcomes between anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.比较颈椎间盘置换术(ACDR)与微创后路颈椎侧方椎间孔切开术(MI-PCF)治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效。
Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.12.010. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
4
Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Alternative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创后路颈椎侧方减压术作为单侧颈椎病神经根病的替代方案:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):1731-1739. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003156.
5
Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.基于 O 型臂导航的微创全内窥镜下颈椎侧方椎间孔切开术。
Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):E215-E223.
6
Surgical Treatment of Single Level Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) Versus Cervical Disk Arthroplasty (CDA) Versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF).单节段神经根型颈椎病的手术治疗:前路颈椎减压融合术(ACDF)、颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与后路颈椎椎间孔切开术(PCF)的比较
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 May 1;35(4):149-154. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001316. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
Rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after initial posterior cervical foraminotomy.初次后路颈椎椎间孔切开术后前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的发生率。
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):971-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
8
Comparing Mid-Term Outcomes Between ACDF and Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.比较 ACDF 与微创后路颈椎侧块孔切开术治疗神经根型颈椎病的中期疗效。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Feb 15;47(4):324-330. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004140.
9
Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of patients with single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy.微创后路颈椎侧方入路减压术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段单侧神经根型颈椎病的比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Jul;28(14):3982-3992. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202407_36573.
10
Reoperation rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy: a propensity-matched analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎后路椎间孔切开术后的再次手术率:一项倾向匹配分析。
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Locked-in syndrome following elective cervical foraminotomy: a case report.选择性颈椎椎间孔切开术后的闭锁综合征:病例报告。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2024 Apr 26;10(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41394-024-00643-4.
2
Perspective: Cervical laminoforaminotomy (CLF) is safer than anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF) for lateral cervical disease.观点:对于外侧型颈椎病,颈椎板间孔切开术(CLF)比颈椎前路椎间盘切除/融合术(ACDF)更安全。
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Feb 16;15:50. doi: 10.25259/SNI_61_2024. eCollection 2024.
3
Surgical Technique of Central and Over-the-Top Full-Endoscopic Decompression of the Cervical Spine: A Technical Note.
颈椎中央及经椎弓根全内镜减压手术技术:技术说明
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 18;13(10):1508. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101508.
4
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Comparative Study of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) for Cervical Foraminal Pathology.经皮内镜颈椎减压术(PECD)与经皮椎弓根切开术、部分椎体切开术(PPPV)前路颈椎减压融合术治疗颈椎侧隐窝病变的临床与影像学疗效比较研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 29;59(7):1222. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071222.
5
Microendoscopic Surgery for Degenerative Disorders of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: The Influence of the Tubular Workspace on Instrument Angulation, Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Reoperation Rates.用于颈椎和腰椎退行性疾病的显微内镜手术:管状工作空间对器械角度、临床疗效、并发症及再次手术率的影响
J Pers Med. 2023 May 30;13(6):912. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060912.
6
Single-level posterior cervical foraminotomy associated with increased incidence of early postoperative wound infection rates relative to anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty.与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术和颈椎间盘置换术相比,单节段后路颈椎椎间孔切开术术后早期伤口感染率的发生率更高。
J Spine Surg. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):54-64. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-39. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
7
Comparison of Single-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Radiculopathy.单节段后路颈椎椎间孔切开术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗神经根病的比较。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):418-425. doi: 10.14444/8447. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
8
Cervical kinematic change after posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for disc herniation or foraminal stenosis.颈椎间盘突出症或神经孔狭窄后路全内镜下颈椎侧方减压术后颈椎运动学变化。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0281926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281926. eCollection 2023.
9
Cervical Radiculopathy: Focus on Factors for Better Surgical Outcomes and Operative Techniques.颈神经根病:关注改善手术效果的因素及手术技术
Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):995-1012. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0445. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
10
Clinical effect of channel assisted cervical key hole technology combined with ultrasonic bone osteotome in the treatment of single segment cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.通道辅助下颈椎钥匙孔技术联合超声骨刀治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 17;9:1029028. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1029028. eCollection 2022.