Imam Mohamed S, Alshahrani Shahad A, Alotaibi Rahaf Mubarak S, Almurayeh Khalid Nassir, Alshabab Naif Ayidh, Almutairi Nora Khaled, Alomar Hanin, Alomair Leen, Boules Marina E, Abdelrahim Mohamed E, Amin Mohammed A
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Shaqra 11961, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Fom El Khalig Square, Kasr Al-Aini Street, Cairo 11796, Egypt.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):5531. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185531.
This meta-analysis was designed to compare the risk of postoperative wound complications in various orthopedic surgeries (OSs) affected by the perioperative use of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated using dichotomous or continuous random or fixed-effect models, based on the meta-analysis data. This study incorporated 14 investigations conducted between 2005 and 2023, encompassing a total population of 19,021 individuals undergoing diverse OSs. Participants who continued their bDMARDs exhibited a substantially higher incidence of postoperative surgical site infections (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.12-1.72, = 0.002) compared to those who withheld bDMARDs. However, the study did not find any statistically significant difference between the continuation or withholding of bDMARDs regarding delayed wound healing (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.00-4.06, = 0.05) or disease flares (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.28-1.25, = 0.17). The results show that patients who continued their bDMARDs had a notably higher incidence of postoperative surgical site infections. However, no significant differences were observed in delayed wound healing or disease flares when compared to those who withheld bDMARDs. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this analysis, such as the relatively small number of participants and the limited number of studies available for certain comparisons, which may impact the validity of the findings.
本荟萃分析旨在比较围手术期使用生物性改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)对各类骨科手术(OSs)术后伤口并发症风险的影响。根据荟萃分析数据,采用二分法或连续随机或固定效应模型计算比值比(OR)和平均差(MD)以及95%置信区间(CIs)。本研究纳入了2005年至2023年间进行的14项调查,涵盖了总共19,021名接受不同骨科手术的个体。与停用bDMARDs的参与者相比,继续使用bDMARDs的参与者术后手术部位感染的发生率显著更高(OR,1.39;95% CI,1.12 - 1.72,P = 0.002)。然而,该研究未发现继续或停用bDMARDs在伤口延迟愈合(OR,2.02;95% CI,1.00 - 4.06,P = 0.05)或疾病复发(OR,0.59;95% CI,0.28 - 1.25,P = 0.17)方面存在任何统计学上的显著差异。结果表明,继续使用bDMARDs的患者术后手术部位感染的发生率明显更高。然而,与停用bDMARDs的患者相比,在伤口延迟愈合或疾病复发方面未观察到显著差异。必须认识到本分析的局限性,例如参与者数量相对较少以及某些比较可用的研究数量有限,这可能会影响研究结果的有效性。