Riedl Kathrin, Probst Andreas, Ebigbo Alanna, Steinbrück Ingo, Allgaier Hans-Peter, Albers David, Mende Matthias, Anzinger Michael, Schirra Joerg, Rempel Viktor, Lorenz Albrecht, Faiss Siegbert, Wallstabe Ingo, Denzer Ulrike, Wannhoff Andreas, Dumoulin Franz Ludwig, Muzalyova Anna, Messmann Helmut
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Medical Department, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5538. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185538.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC), often fulfilling guideline criteria (GC) or expanded criteria (EC). When lesions exceed the EC, surgical resection is recommended. However, a subgroup of these patients are not treated surgically. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term follow-up of patients after ESD for EGC outside the EC (out of indication; OI). Patients who were included in the prospective German ESD registry were analyzed when ESD was performed for EGC. Patients were stratified in three groups according to histopathological features (GC, EC and OI). The results were evaluated in terms of patient characteristics, procedure characteristics and follow-up data. Over a 48-month period, 195 patients from 14 German centers were included. In total, 71 lesions (36.4%) met the guideline criteria, 70 lesions (35.9%) corresponded to the expanded criteria and 54 lesions (27.7%) turned out to be OI. The R0 resection rate was significantly higher for the GC and EC groups than for the OI group (94.4% vs. 84.3% vs. 55.6%, < 0.001). Additional surgery was not performed in 72% (39/54) of patients in the OI group. During a mean follow-up of 37 months, overall survival showed no significant difference between the EC and OI groups when endoscopic follow-up was performed without additional surgery ( = 0.064). The results show that a good long-term survival can be achieved after ESD for patients with OI lesions without additional surgery. The treatment decision has to be made on an individual basis, taking the patient's comorbidities and the risk of surgical resection into account.
内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)已成为早期胃癌(EGC)的标准治疗方法,通常符合指南标准(GC)或扩大标准(EC)。当病变超过EC时,建议进行手术切除。然而,这些患者中有一部分未接受手术治疗。本研究的目的是调查EC以外的EGC患者接受ESD治疗后的长期随访情况(超出适应证;OI)。对纳入前瞻性德国ESD登记处的患者进行分析,这些患者因EGC接受了ESD治疗。根据组织病理学特征将患者分为三组(GC、EC和OI)。根据患者特征、手术特征和随访数据对结果进行评估。在48个月的时间里,纳入了来自德国14个中心的195例患者。总共有71个病变(36.4%)符合指南标准,70个病变(35.9%)符合扩大标准,54个病变(27.7%)为OI。GC组和EC组的R0切除率显著高于OI组(94.4%对84.3%对55.6%,<0.001)。OI组72%(39/54)的患者未进行额外手术。在平均37个月的随访期间,当进行内镜随访且未进行额外手术时,EC组和OI组的总生存率无显著差异(=0.064)。结果表明,对于OI病变的患者,ESD后不进行额外手术也可实现良好的长期生存。治疗决策必须根据个体情况做出,同时考虑患者的合并症和手术切除风险。