Suppr超能文献

运动负荷试验的目标心率公式:证据是什么?

Target Heart Rate Formulas for Exercise Stress Testing: What Is the Evidence?

作者信息

Almaadawy Omar, Uretsky Barry F, Krittanawong Chayakrit, Birnbaum Yochai

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Health, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5562. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185562.

Abstract

Exercise stress testing (EST) is commonly used to evaluate chest pain, with some labs using 85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate (APMHR) as an endpoint for EST. The APMHR is often calculated using the formula 220-age. However, the accuracy of this formula and 85% APMHR as an endpoint may be questioned. Moreover, failing to reach 85% APMHR (known as chronotropic insufficiency) may also indicate poor cardiovascular prognosis, but measurements, such as percentage heart rate reserve (%HRR), maximum rate pressure product (MRPP), and the maximum metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs) reached during EST may provide better prediction of cardiovascular outcomes than not reaching 85% of APMHR. There is a need to incorporate comprehensive measurements to improve the diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of EST.

摘要

运动应激试验(EST)常用于评估胸痛,一些实验室将年龄预测最大心率(APMHR)的85%作为EST的终点。APMHR通常使用公式220 - 年龄来计算。然而,该公式以及85% APMHR作为终点的准确性可能受到质疑。此外,未能达到85% APMHR(称为变时性功能不全)也可能表明心血管预后不良,但EST期间达到的心率储备百分比(%HRR)、最大心率血压乘积(MRPP)以及最大代谢当量(METs)等测量指标,可能比未达到APMHR的85%能更好地预测心血管结局。需要纳入综合测量指标以提高EST的诊断和预后能力。

相似文献

7
Accuracy of Commonly Used Age-Predicted Maximal Heart Rate Equations.常用年龄预测最大心率公式的准确性。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Sep 1;13(7):1242-1250. doi: 10.70252/XFSJ6815. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

8
Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: an era of paradigm shift.心脏结节病的诊断:范式转变的时代。
Ann Nucl Med. 2020 Feb;34(2):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s12149-019-01431-z. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验