• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于自然的健康干预措施中的知识和经验感知。

Perceptions of Knowledge and Experience in Nature-Based Health Interventions.

机构信息

Department of Leadership, Management & Human Capital, School of Business and Economics, National University, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.

Health & Technology Partners, Milwaukee, WI 53202, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;21(9):1182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091182.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21091182
PMID:39338065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11431650/
Abstract

Although perceptions and uses vary, nature-based health interventions (NBHIs) help facilitate the additional health benefits of physical activity (PA) experienced in nature, thereby reducing all-cause morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this mixed-methods, cross-sectional study was to better understand perceptions, terminology, and participation in NBHIs. A questionnaire was developed by reviewing validated instruments and gauging expert experience with stakeholders. Distributed electronically, a community partner listserv promoting active living served as the population. Quantitative questionnaire measures assessed familiarity with NBHI terms, concepts, experience, how NBHI should be used, and the importance of NBHI components. Qualitative themes included the strengths and weaknesses of NBHIs. Participants ( = 53) were familiar with the terms nature play (82%), forest bathing (78%), and park and nature prescriptions (74%) and moderately familiar with NBHIs (5-point Likert scale, M = 3.27, SD = 1.17). Most thought NBHIs could be useful in treating physical (96%) and mental health conditions (100%) and would follow or write one (80%). The location was reported as the most important component, followed by access, social comfort, dosage, and ongoing support. This study suggests stakeholders are familiar with and support NBHIs conceptually; however, policies, support, and funding opportunities are needed to operationalize components to increase use of NBHIs.

摘要

虽然人们对自然健康干预(NBHIs)的看法和用法各不相同,但它们有助于促进在自然环境中进行身体活动(PA)所带来的额外健康益处,从而降低全因发病率和死亡率。本混合方法、横断面研究的目的是更好地理解对 NBHIs 的看法、术语和参与情况。通过回顾经过验证的工具并衡量利益相关者的专家经验,制定了一份问卷。通过电子方式分发,一个促进积极生活的社区合作伙伴列表服务充当了研究对象。定量问卷衡量了对 NBHI 术语、概念、经验的熟悉程度、如何使用 NBHI 以及 NBHI 组成部分的重要性。定性主题包括 NBHIs 的优缺点。参与者(n=53)熟悉自然游戏(82%)、森林浴(78%)和公园和自然处方(74%)等术语,对 NBHIs 的熟悉程度为中等(5 点李克特量表,M=3.27,SD=1.17)。大多数人认为 NBHIs 可用于治疗身体(96%)和心理健康状况(100%),并会遵循或撰写一份(80%)。报告称地点是最重要的组成部分,其次是访问、社交舒适度、剂量和持续支持。这项研究表明,利益相关者在概念上熟悉并支持 NBHIs;然而,需要政策、支持和资金机会来实施组件,以增加 NBHIs 的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04f/11431650/21bfb1600fb9/ijerph-21-01182-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04f/11431650/2297f01d6e0d/ijerph-21-01182-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04f/11431650/21bfb1600fb9/ijerph-21-01182-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04f/11431650/2297f01d6e0d/ijerph-21-01182-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04f/11431650/21bfb1600fb9/ijerph-21-01182-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Knowledge and Experience in Nature-Based Health Interventions.基于自然的健康干预措施中的知识和经验感知。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;21(9):1182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091182.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Identifying solutions to increase participation in physical activity interventions within a socio-economically disadvantaged community: a qualitative study.确定在社会经济弱势社区增加体育活动干预参与度的解决方案:一项定性研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 May 23;11:68. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-68.
5
Athletic Trainers' Familiarity, Comfort, Knowledge, and Recognition of Social Determinants of Health.运动训练员对健康社会决定因素的熟悉程度、舒适度、知识和认知。
J Athl Train. 2024 Apr 1;59(4):403-409. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0337.22.
6
'Language is the source of misunderstandings'--impact of terminology on public perceptions of health promotion messages.“语言是误解之源”——术语对公众对健康促进信息认知的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 23;15:579. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1884-1.
7
Insights into physical activity promotion among Australian chiropractors: a cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚脊医开展身体活动促进工作的见解:一项横断面调查。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2024 Jun 14;32(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12998-024-00543-2.
8
Promoting physical activity among community groups of older women in socio-economically disadvantaged areas: randomised feasibility study.促进社会经济弱势群体中老年女性社区群体的身体活动:随机可行性研究。
Trials. 2019 Apr 25;20(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3312-9.
9
Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of oncologists and oncology health care providers in promoting physical activity to cancer survivors: an international survey.肿瘤学家和肿瘤医疗保健提供者在促进癌症幸存者身体活动方面的知识、态度和实践:一项国际调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3711-3719. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4230-1. Epub 2018 May 8.
10
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Nature and Mental Health in Urban Texas: A NatureScore-Based Study.德克萨斯城市的自然与心理健康:基于自然评分的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;21(2):168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020168.
2
A Scoping Review of the Health Benefits of Nature-Based Physical Activity.基于自然的体育活动对健康益处的范围综述。
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2021 Sep 1;1(3):154-172. eCollection 2021.
3
A time with e-Natureza (e-Nature): a model of nature-based health interventions as a complex adaptive system.与电子自然(e-Nature)共度的时光:一种基于自然的健康干预模式作为复杂适应系统。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 22;14:1226197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1226197. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of nature prescriptions on cardiometabolic and mental health, and physical activity: a systematic review.自然疗法对心脏代谢和心理健康以及身体活动的影响:系统评价。
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Apr;7(4):e313-e328. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00025-6.
5
Development and validation of self-efficacy and intention measures for spending time in nature.发展和验证用于花时间在自然环境中的自我效能感和意愿的测量工具。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;10(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00764-1.
6
Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements.准备、开展和分析德尔菲调查:跨学科实践、新方向与进展
MethodsX. 2021 May 28;8:101401. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101401. eCollection 2021.
7
Nature-Based Interventions and Mind-Body Interventions: Saving Public Health Costs Whilst Increasing Life Satisfaction and Happiness.基于自然的干预措施和身心干预措施:节省公共卫生成本,同时提高生活满意度和幸福感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 23;17(21):7769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217769.
8
Prescribing Physical Activity in Parks and Nature: Health Care Provider Insights on Park Prescription Programs.在公园及自然环境中开具体育活动处方:医疗保健提供者对公园处方项目的见解
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(10):958-967. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0479.
9
Nature Prescriptions for Health: A Review of Evidence and Research Opportunities.自然疗法与健康:循证评价与研究机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124213.
10
Assessing Factors That Influence Healthcare Provider Attitudes and Practices regarding Place-Based Exercise Prescriptions: Results of Principal Components Analysis of a Newly Developed Survey Instrument.评估影响医疗服务提供者对基于场所的运动处方的态度和实践的因素:一项新开发的调查问卷的主成分分析结果
Adv Prev Med. 2020 May 11;2020:5084053. doi: 10.1155/2020/5084053. eCollection 2020.