• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Influence of Occlusion Type on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Complete Dentures-Lingualized vs. Bilaterally Balanced Occlusion.咬合类型对全口义齿患者口腔健康相关生活质量的影响——舌向集中咬合与双侧平衡咬合对比
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):921. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090921.
2
Exploring Adaptation and Satisfaction in Copied Complete Dentures Regarding Two Different Occlusal Schemes.探索两种不同咬合方案的复制全口义齿的适应性和满意度。
Int J Prosthodont. 2023 Jan-Feb;36(1):13–19. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7367.
3
Prospective clinical study of bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO) versus canine-guided occlusion (CGO) in complete denture wearers.双侧平衡咬合(BBO)与尖牙引导咬合(CGO)在全口义齿患者中的前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4181-4188. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02857-5. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
Comparisons of patient satisfaction levels with complete dentures of different occlusions: a randomized clinical trial.不同咬合的全口义齿患者满意度比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Jun;23(4):259-66. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12101. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
5
Prospective clinical trial comparing lingualized occlusion to bilateral balanced occlusion in complete dentures: a pilot study.全口义齿中舌侧集中 咬合与双侧平衡 咬合比较的前瞻性临床试验:一项初步研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):103-9.
6
Patient Reported Outcomes on Different Occlusal Schemes in Complete Denture Wearers.全口义齿患者不同咬合方案的患者报告结局。
Int J Prosthodont. 2022 January/February;35(1):53–61. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7402. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
A double blind randomized clinical trial comparing lingualized and fully bilateral balanced posterior occlusion for conventional complete dentures.一项比较传统全口义齿舌侧化与完全双侧平衡后牙合的双盲随机临床试验。
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Apr;61(2):113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Comparative Study of Acceptance and Adaptation to New Complete Dentures, Using Two Construction Protocols.使用两种制作方案对新全口义齿接受度与适应性的比较研究
J Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;25(7):536-543. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12466. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
Masticatory efficiency in complete denture and single implant-retained mandibular overdenture wearers with different occlusion schemes: A randomized clinical trial.不同咬合方案的全口义齿和单种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿佩戴者的咀嚼效率:一项随机临床试验。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jun;129(6):888-894. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.028. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
10
Masticatory function in complete denture wearers varying degree of mandibular bone resorption and occlusion concept: canine-guided occlusion versus bilateral balanced occlusion in a cross-over trial.全口义齿佩戴者咀嚼功能在不同程度下颌骨吸收和咬合概念中的变化:交叉试验中的犬齿导向性咬合与双侧平衡咬合。
J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Oct;63(4):421-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction with Complete Dentures.影响患者对全口义齿满意度的因素。
Int J Dent. 2022 Apr 8;2022:9565320. doi: 10.1155/2022/9565320. eCollection 2022.
2
Edentulous Patient Satisfaction with Conventional Complete Dentures.无牙颌患者对传统全口义齿的满意度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 24;58(3):344. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030344.
3
Differences in quality of life and patient satisfaction between complete denture occlusion schemes: A parallel randomized control trial.全口义齿咬合方案的生活质量和患者满意度差异:一项平行随机对照试验。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 May;129(5):748-753. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Patient Reported Outcomes on Different Occlusal Schemes in Complete Denture Wearers.全口义齿患者不同咬合方案的患者报告结局。
Int J Prosthodont. 2022 January/February;35(1):53–61. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7402. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Exploring Adaptation and Satisfaction in Copied Complete Dentures Regarding Two Different Occlusal Schemes.探索两种不同咬合方案的复制全口义齿的适应性和满意度。
Int J Prosthodont. 2023 Jan-Feb;36(1):13–19. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7367.
6
Complete Denture Occlusion: Best Evidence Consensus Statement.全口义齿咬合:最佳证据共识声明。
J Prosthodont. 2021 Apr;30(S1):72-77. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13309.
7
Choosing the denture occlusion - A Systematic review.选择义齿咬合——一项系统评价。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jul-Sep;20(3):269-277. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_409_19. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
8
Maintaining occlusal stability by selecting the most appropriate occlusal scheme in complete removable prosthesis.在全口可摘局部义齿修复中,通过选择最合适的咬合方案来维持咬合稳定性。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2019 Nov;55(1):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
Occlusal schemes for complete dentures.全口义齿的咬合方案
Evid Based Dent. 2018 Dec;19(4):116-117. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401346.
10
The Effect of Complete Denture Occlusion on Function and Patient Quality of Life: Systematic Review.全口义齿咬合对功能及患者生活质量的影响:系统评价
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Mar 1;26(1):24-30. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01757Patel07.

咬合类型对全口义齿患者口腔健康相关生活质量的影响——舌向集中咬合与双侧平衡咬合对比

The Influence of Occlusion Type on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Complete Dentures-Lingualized vs. Bilaterally Balanced Occlusion.

作者信息

Poljak Nancy, Kovačić Ivan, Petričević Nikola, Tadin Antonija, Klančnik Marisa

机构信息

Health Centre of Split-Dalmatia County, 21000 Split, Croatia.

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Split University Hospital, 21000 Split, Croatia.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):921. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090921.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14090921
PMID:39338175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11433608/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, single-blind controlled study aimed to investigate the QoL and satisfaction of patients wearing complete dentures with lingualized (LO) and bilaterally balanced occlusion (BBO). Participants were stratified based on their prior experience with complete dentures.

METHODS

The study involved 131 complete denture wearers who were categorized into four groups: G1-first-time prosthesis wearers treated with LO (n = 33); G2-first-time prosthesis wearers treated with BBO (n = 31); G3-participants with prior prosthesis experience treated with LO (n = 34); G4-participants with prior prosthesis experience treated with BBO (n = 33). After wearing the prosthesis for one month, all participants completed the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire. A statistical analysis was conducted using the χ test, Kruskal-Wallis analysis and Mann-Whitney test, with significance determined at < 0.05.

RESULTS

After dividing the respondents into two groups, a statistically significant difference was observed in the distribution of scores for three questions related to oral pain severity, anxiety, and difficulty relaxing. However, the distribution of scores for all other questions did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups studied ( < 0.05). The total OHIP-14 score was also not statistically different (z = 0.469; = 0.639). However, when respondents were divided into four groups, the median score for first-time denture wearers was 3.9 points higher in respondents who received dentures with BBO compared to those with LO ( < 0.001). Furthermore, the median score for first-time denture wearers who received BBO was higher than for those in the second group who received BBO ( = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Patients wearing complete dentures for the first time demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction with the LO scheme compared to the BBO scheme. In contrast, satisfaction levels between occlusal schemes did not significantly differ among patients with prior denture-wearing experience. Novice denture wearers reported heightened sensations of oral discomfort, anxiety, and difficulty relaxing regardless of the occlusal scheme compared to experienced wearers, likely due to the unrealistic expectations that first-time wearers often have about complete dentures.

摘要

目的

本随机、单盲对照研究旨在调查佩戴舌侧集中(LO)和双侧平衡咬合(BBO)全口义齿患者的生活质量(QoL)和满意度。参与者根据其既往佩戴全口义齿的经验进行分层。

方法

该研究纳入了131名全口义齿佩戴者,分为四组:G1-接受LO治疗的初次佩戴义齿者(n = 33);G2-接受BBO治疗的初次佩戴义齿者(n = 31);G3-有义齿佩戴经验且接受LO治疗的参与者(n = 34);G4-有义齿佩戴经验且接受BBO治疗的参与者(n = 33)。佩戴义齿一个月后,所有参与者完成口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP-14)问卷。采用χ检验、Kruskal-Wallis分析和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计分析,显著性水平设定为<0.05。

结果

将受访者分为两组后,在与口腔疼痛严重程度、焦虑和放松困难相关的三个问题的得分分布上观察到统计学显著差异。然而,在研究的组间,所有其他问题的得分分布没有显示出统计学显著差异(<0.05)。OHIP-14总分在统计学上也没有差异(z = 0.469;P = 0.639)。然而,当将受访者分为四组时,接受BBO义齿的初次佩戴义齿者的中位数得分比接受LO义齿者高3.9分(<0.001)。此外,接受BBO的初次佩戴义齿者的中位数得分高于接受BBO的第二组(P = 0.013)。

结论

与BBO方案相比,初次佩戴全口义齿的患者对LO方案表现出显著更高的满意度。相比之下,有义齿佩戴经验的患者在不同咬合方案之间的满意度水平没有显著差异。与有经验的佩戴者相比,无论咬合方案如何,初次佩戴义齿者报告的口腔不适、焦虑和放松困难的感觉更强烈,这可能是由于初次佩戴者对全口义齿往往抱有不切实际的期望。