Ouatu Anca, Buliga-Finiș Oana Nicoleta, Tanase Daniela Maria, Badescu Minerva Codruta, Dima Nicoleta, Floria Mariana, Popescu Diana, Richter Patricia, Rezus Ciprian
Faculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 University Street, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Department of Internal Medicine, IIIrd Medical Clinic, "Sf. Spiridon" Emergency Hospital, 1 Independentei Street, 700111 Iasi, Romania.
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 20;14(9):1002. doi: 10.3390/jpm14091002.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety profiles to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Given their favorable pharmacological profile, including the rapid onset and offset of action, fixed dosing, and predictable pharmacokinetics with a consistent dose-response relationship, reducing the need for frequent blood tests, researchers have investigated the potential of NOACs in patients with AF and valvular heart disease (VHD).
Clinical trials, excluding patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate/severe mitral stenosis, have shown the benefits of NOACs over VKAs in this population. However, there is a need for further research to determine if these findings apply to mechanical valve prostheses and NOACs.
Several ongoing randomized controlled trials are underway to provide more definitive evidence regarding NOAC treatment in moderate to severe rheumatic mitral stenosis. Importantly, recent trials that included patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves (also transcatheter heart valves) have provided evidence supporting the safety of NOACs in this specific patient population. Ongoing research aims to clearly define the specific scenarios where NOACs can be safely and effectively prescribed for various types of VHD, including moderate/severe mitral stenosis and mechanical valves.
The aim of this review is to accurately identify the specific situations in which NOACs can be prescribed in patients with VHD, with a focus centered on each type of valvulopathy.
背景/目的:在治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)方面,非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs)已显示出与维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)相似的有效性和安全性。鉴于其良好的药理学特性,包括起效迅速、作用消退快、固定剂量以及具有可预测的药代动力学和一致的剂量反应关系,减少了频繁血液检测的需求,研究人员已对NOACs在患有AF和瓣膜性心脏病(VHD)患者中的潜力进行了研究。
临床试验排除了机械瓣膜置换患者或中重度二尖瓣狭窄患者,结果显示在该人群中NOACs优于VKAs。然而,需要进一步研究以确定这些发现是否适用于机械瓣膜假体和NOACs。
正在进行几项随机对照试验,以提供关于NOACs治疗中重度风湿性二尖瓣狭窄的更确凿证据。重要的是,最近纳入心房颤动和生物瓣膜(也包括经导管心脏瓣膜)患者的试验提供了支持NOACs在这一特定患者群体中安全性的证据。正在进行的研究旨在明确界定在各种类型的VHD(包括中重度二尖瓣狭窄和机械瓣膜)中可以安全有效地开具NOACs的具体情况。
本综述的目的是准确识别在VHD患者中可以开具NOACs的具体情况,重点关注每种瓣膜病类型。