Gao Xu Shan, Groot Thomas, Schoenmakers Sam, Louwers Yvonne, Budding Andries, Laven Joop
Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
InBiome B.V., 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 7;12(9):1859. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091859.
The composition of the vaginal microbiota prior to an IVF/IVF-ICSI treatment can predict the chance of achieving a pregnancy. To improve clinical applicability and be more patient-friendly, the self-collection of vaginal samples would be preferable. However, the reliability of patient-collected samples compared to physician-collected samples remains unclear. This study compares microbiome outcomes from patient-collected versus physician-collected vaginal samples. This is a prospective pilot study consisting of two cohorts: Cohort I involved patient self-sampling of the vagina, followed by a physician-collected vaginal swab, while Cohort II involved the reversed order of collection. The interspace profiling (IS-Pro) technique was used to analyze the microbiota composition in all samples. From May 2021 to March 2022, a total of 444 samples were collected from = 222 patients (aged 21-44 years), with Cohort I ( = 109) and Cohort II ( = 113). The vaginal microbiome composition of both cohorts was highly similar, regardless of the sampling order, with a mean cosine similarity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.91, 0.95) in Cohort I and 0.94 (95% CI 0.92, 0.96) in Cohort II. Furthermore, ANOVA analysis revealed no significant differences in bacterial species abundance between physician- and patient-collected samples, nor between first and second sample collections. The self-collection of vaginal samples can be considered comparable to physician-collected samples and indicates a more patient-friendly and convenient collection of the vaginal microbiome in an outpatient clinical setting.
体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/IVF-ICSI)治疗前阴道微生物群的组成可以预测怀孕的几率。为了提高临床适用性并对患者更友好,阴道样本的自我采集会更可取。然而,与医生采集的样本相比,患者采集样本的可靠性仍不明确。本研究比较了患者采集与医生采集的阴道样本的微生物组结果。这是一项前瞻性试点研究,由两个队列组成:队列I包括患者自行采集阴道样本,随后由医生采集阴道拭子,而队列II的采集顺序相反。采用间隙分析(IS-Pro)技术分析所有样本中的微生物群组成。从2021年5月至2022年3月,共从222名患者(年龄21-44岁)中采集了444个样本,其中队列I有109个样本,队列II有113个样本。无论采样顺序如何,两个队列的阴道微生物组组成都高度相似,队列I的平均余弦相似度为0.93(95%CI 0.91, 0.95),队列II为0.94(95%CI 0.92, 0.96)。此外,方差分析显示,医生采集和患者采集的样本之间,以及第一次和第二次样本采集之间,细菌种类丰度没有显著差异。阴道样本的自我采集可被视为与医生采集的样本相当,这表明在门诊临床环境中,阴道微生物组的采集对患者更友好、更方便。