Ghori Muhammad Rizwan, Wan Tat-Chee, Sodhy Gian Chand, Aljaidi Mohammad, Rizwan Amna, Sadiq Ali Safaa, Kaiwartya Omprakash
School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Malaysia.
Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Zarqa University, Zarqa 13110, Jordan.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;24(18):5901. doi: 10.3390/s24185901.
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) mesh networks provide flexible and reliable communication among low-power sensor-enabled Internet of Things (IoT) devices, enabling them to communicate in a flexible and robust manner. Nonetheless, the majority of existing BLE-based mesh protocols operate as flooding-based piconet or scatternet overlays on top of existing Bluetooth star topologies. In contrast, the Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol used primarily in wireless ad hoc networks (WAHNs) is forwarding-based and therefore more efficient, with lower overheads. However, the packet delivery ratio (PDR) and link recovery time for AODV performs worse compared to flooding-based BLE protocols when encountering link disruptions. We propose the Multipath Optimized AODV (M-O-AODV) protocol to address these issues, with improved PDR and link robustness compared with other forwarding-based protocols. In addition, M-O-AODV achieved a PDR of 88%, comparable to the PDR of 92% for flooding-based BLE, unlike protocols such as Reverse-AODV (R-AODV). Also, M-O-AODV was able to perform link recovery within 3700 ms in the case of node failures, compared with other forwarding-based protocols that require 4800 ms to 6000 ms. Consequently, M-O-AODV-based BLE mesh networks are more efficient for wireless sensor-enabled IoT environments.
低功耗蓝牙(BLE)网状网络在支持低功耗传感器的物联网(IoT)设备之间提供灵活且可靠的通信,使它们能够以灵活且稳健的方式进行通信。尽管如此,大多数现有的基于BLE的网状协议是在现有的蓝牙星型拓扑之上作为基于泛洪的微微网或散射网覆盖层运行的。相比之下,主要用于无线自组织网络(WAHN)的按需距离矢量(AODV)协议是基于转发的,因此效率更高,开销更低。然而,在遇到链路中断时,AODV的数据包传输率(PDR)和链路恢复时间比基于泛洪的BLE协议表现更差。我们提出了多路径优化AODV(M-O-AODV)协议来解决这些问题,与其他基于转发的协议相比,它具有更高的PDR和链路鲁棒性。此外,M-O-AODV实现了88%的PDR,与基于泛洪的BLE的92%的PDR相当,这与反向AODV(R-AODV)等协议不同。而且,在节点故障的情况下,M-O-AODV能够在3700毫秒内完成链路恢复,而其他基于转发的协议则需要4800毫秒到6000毫秒。因此,基于M-O-AODV的BLE网状网络在支持无线传感器的物联网环境中效率更高。