Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe P.O. Box 49, Uganda.
Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe P.O. Box 49, Uganda.
Viruses. 2024 Sep 13;16(9):1454. doi: 10.3390/v16091454.
We assessed the performance and clinical relevance of Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing (NGS) for HIV-1 genotyping compared with Sanger sequencing (SS). We analyzed 167 participants, 45 with virologic failure (VL ≥ 1000 copies/mL), i.e., cases, and 122 time-matched participants with virologic suppression (VL < 1000 copies/mL), i.e., controls, 12 months post-ART initiation. Major surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) detected by SS were all detectable by NGS. Among cases at 12 months, SS identified SDRMs in 32/45 (71.1%) while NGS identified SDRMs among 35/45 (77.8%), increasing the number of cases with SDRMs by 3/45 (6.7%). Participants identified with, and proportions of major SDRMs increased when NGS was used. NGS vs. SS at endpoint revealed for NNRTIs: 36/45 vs. 33/45; Y181C: 26/45 vs. 24/45; K103N: 9/45 vs. 6/45 participants with SDRMs, respectively. At baseline, NGS revealed major SDRMs in 9/45 (20%) cases without SDRMs by SS. Participant MBL/043, among the nine, the following major SDRMs existed: L90M to PIs, K65R and M184V to NRTIs, and Y181C and K103N to NNRTIs. The SDRMs among the nine increased SDRMs to NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs. Only 43/122 (25.7%) of participants had pre-treatment minority SDRMs. Also, 24.4% of the cases vs. 26.2 of controls had minority SDRMs ( = 0.802); minority SDRMs were not associated with virologic failure. NGS agreed with SS in HIV-1 genotyping but detected additional major SDRMs and identified more participants harboring major SDRMs, expanding the HIV DRM profile of this cohort. NGS could improve HIV genotyping to guide treatment decisions for enhancing ART efficacy, a cardinal pre-requisite in the pursuit of the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets.
我们评估了 Illumina MiSeq 下一代测序 (NGS) 与 Sanger 测序 (SS) 相比在 HIV-1 基因分型中的性能和临床相关性。我们分析了 167 名参与者,其中 45 名发生病毒学失败 (VL≥1000 拷贝/mL),即病例,以及 122 名病毒学抑制 (VL<1000 拷贝/mL) 且时间匹配的参与者,即对照,在 ART 开始后 12 个月。通过 SS 检测到的主要耐药突变 (SDRMs) 均可通过 NGS 检测到。在 12 个月时的病例中,SS 鉴定出 45 例中的 32 例 (71.1%),而 NGS 鉴定出 45 例中的 35 例 (77.8%),增加了 SDRMs 的病例数为 3/45 (6.7%)。使用 NGS 增加了病例中 SDRMs 的数量和比例。与 SS 相比,NGS 在终点时显示:NNRTIs:36/45 比 33/45;Y181C:26/45 比 24/45;K103N:9/45 比 6/45 有 SDRMs 的参与者。在基线时,NGS 在没有 SS 鉴定出 SDRMs 的 45 例病例中发现了主要 SDRMs。参与者 MBL/043,在这 9 例中,存在以下主要 SDRMs:L90M 到 PIs,K65R 和 M184V 到 NRTIs,以及 Y181C 和 K103N 到 NNRTIs。这 9 例中的 SDRMs 增加了 NRTIs、NNRTIs 和 PIs 的 SDRMs。仅有 43/122 (25.7%) 的参与者有治疗前的少数 SDRMs。此外,病例中的 24.4%与对照中的 26.2%有少数 SDRMs (=0.802);少数 SDRMs 与病毒学失败无关。NGS 在 HIV-1 基因分型方面与 SS 一致,但检测到更多的主要 SDRMs,并鉴定出更多携带主要 SDRMs 的参与者,扩大了该队列的 HIV DRM 特征。NGS 可以改进 HIV 基因分型,以指导治疗决策,提高 ART 疗效,这是实现艾滋病署 95-95-95 目标的首要前提。