Suppr超能文献

医疗器械材料体外血栓形成评估的分子生物标志物。

Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials.

机构信息

Division of Applied Mechanics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2024 Oct;112(10):e35491. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35491.

Abstract

To develop standardized in vitro thrombogenicity test methods for evaluating medical device materials, three platelet activation biomarkers, beta-thromboglobulin (β-TG), platelet factor 4 (PF4), soluble p-selectin (CD62P), and a plasma coagulation marker, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), were investigated. Whole blood, drawn from six healthy human volunteers into Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution A was recalcified and heparinized over a concentration range of 0.5-1.5 U/mL. The blood was incubated with test materials with different thrombogenic potentials for 60 min at 37°C, using a 6 cm/mL material surface area to blood volume ratio. After incubation, the blood platelet count was measured before centrifuging the blood to prepare platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-free plasma (PFP) for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis of the biomarkers. The results show that all four markers effectively differentiated the materials with different thrombogenic potentials at heparin concentrations from 1.0 to 1.5 U/mL. When a donor-specific heparin concentration (determined by activated clotting time) was used, the markers were able to differentiate materials consistently for blood from all the donors. Additionally, using PFP instead of PPP further improved the test method's ability to differentiate the thrombogenic materials from the negative control for β-TG and TAT. Moreover, the platelet activation markers were able to detect reversible platelet activation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP). In summary, all three platelet activation markers (β-TG, PF4, and CD62P) can distinguish thrombogenic potentials of different materials and detect ADP-induced reversible platelet activation. Test consistency and sensitivity can be enhanced by using a donor-specific heparin concentration and PFP. The same test conditions are applicable to the measurement of coagulation marker TAT.

摘要

为了开发用于评估医疗器械材料的标准化体外血栓形成性测试方法,研究了三种血小板活化生物标志物,β-血栓球蛋白(β-TG)、血小板因子 4(PF4)、可溶性 P-选择素(CD62P)和一种血浆凝血标志物,凝血酶-抗凝血酶复合物(TAT)。将来自 6 名健康人类志愿者的全血用抗凝剂柠檬酸钠葡萄糖溶液 A 抽取,并在 0.5-1.5 U/mL 的浓度范围内重新钙化和肝素化。将血液与具有不同血栓形成潜力的测试材料在 37°C 下孵育 60 分钟,使用 6 cm/mL 材料表面积与血液体积比。孵育后,在离心血液以制备血小板贫乏血浆(PPP)和血小板无血浆(PFP)之前,测量血小板计数,用于酶联免疫吸附分析生物标志物。结果表明,所有四种标志物在肝素浓度为 1.0 至 1.5 U/mL 时,有效地区分了具有不同血栓形成潜力的材料。当使用供体特异性肝素浓度(通过激活凝血时间确定)时,标志物能够一致地区分来自所有供体的血液中的材料。此外,使用 PFP 代替 PPP 进一步提高了该测试方法区分血小板激活标志物和β-TG 和 TAT 阴性对照的血栓形成材料的能力。此外,血小板活化标志物能够检测到由二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导的可逆血小板活化。总之,所有三种血小板活化标志物(β-TG、PF4 和 CD62P)都可以区分不同材料的血栓形成潜力,并检测 ADP 诱导的可逆血小板活化。通过使用供体特异性肝素浓度和 PFP,可以增强测试一致性和敏感性。相同的测试条件适用于凝血标志物 TAT 的测量。

相似文献

1
Molecular Biomarkers for In Vitro Thrombogenicity Assessment of Medical Device Materials.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2024 Oct;112(10):e35491. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35491.
3
Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 1;2016(5):CD012179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012179.
4
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
Soluble P-selectin, but not circulating cell-free DNA, is a potential diagnostic biomarker in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
J Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jul;23(7):2242-2254. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2025.04.006. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
7
Platelet-rich therapies for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD010071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010071.pub3.
8
Platelet-rich therapies for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 23(12):CD010071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010071.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
In Vitro Thrombogenicity Testing of Biomaterials in a Dynamic Flow Loop: Effects of Length and Quantity of Test Samples.
J Med Device. 2023 Sep 1;17(3):031003. doi: 10.1115/1.4062863. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
3
Reversible Platelet Integrin αIIbβ3 Activation and Thrombus Instability.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 19;23(20):12512. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012512.
4
Comparison of animal and human blood for in vitro dynamic thrombogenicity testing of biomaterials.
Artif Organs. 2022 Dec;46(12):2400-2411. doi: 10.1111/aor.14366. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
5
How to manage anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Aug;48(8):1076-1079. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06723-z. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
6
Release of α-granule contents during platelet activation.
Platelets. 2022 May 19;33(4):491-502. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2021.1913576. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
7
Platelet and leukocyte count assay for thrombogenicity screening of biomaterials and medical devices: Evaluation and improvement of ASTM F2888 test standard.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021 Dec;109(12):2259-2267. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34887. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
In vitro methodology for medical device material thrombogenicity assessments: A use condition and bioanalytical proof-of-concept approach.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021 Mar;109(3):358-376. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34705. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
10
Thrombogenic and Inflammatory Reactions to Biomaterials in Medical Devices.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Mar 12;8:123. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00123. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验