Anderson Colin J, Yang HsihTe, Parsons Judy, Ahrens Will A, Jagosky Megan H, Hsu Johann H, Patt Joshua C, Kneisl Jeffrey S, Steuerwald Nury M
Musculoskeletal Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
BACKGROUND: A liquid biopsy is a test that evaluates the status of a disease by analyzing a sample of bodily fluid, most commonly blood. In recent years, there has been progress in the development and clinical application of liquid biopsy methods to identify blood-based, tumor-specific biomarkers for many cancer types. However, the implementation of these technologies to aid in the treatment of patients who have a sarcoma remains behind other fields of cancer medicine. For this study, we chose to evaluate a sarcoma liquid biopsy based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). All human beings have normal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in the blood. In contrast with cfDNA, ctDNA is genetic material present in the blood stream that is derived from a tumor. ctDNA carries the unique genomic fingerprint of the tumor with changes that are not present in normal circulating cfDNA. A successful ctDNA liquid biopsy must be able to target these tumor-specific genetic alterations. For instance, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are common in lung cancers, and ctDNA liquid biopsies are currently in clinical use to evaluate the status of disease in patients who have a lung cancer by detecting EGFR mutations in the blood. As opposed to many carcinomas, sarcomas do not have common recurrent mutations that could serve as the foundation to a ctDNA liquid biopsy. However, many sarcomas have structural changes to their chromosomes, including gains and losses of portions or entire chromosomes, known as copy number alterations (CNAs), that could serve as a target for a ctDNA liquid biopsy. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) amplification in select lipomatous tumors or parosteal osteosarcoma is an example of a CNA due to the presence of extra copies of a segment of the long arm of chromosome 12. Since a majority of sarcomas demonstrate a complex karyotype with numerous CNAs, a blood-based liquid biopsy strategy that searches for these CNAs may be able to detect the presence of sarcoma ctDNA. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a next-generation sequencing technique that evaluates the entire genome. The depth of coverage of WGS refers to how detailed the sequencing is, like higher versus lower power on a microscope. WGS can be performed with high-depth sequencing (that is, > 60×), which can detect individual point mutations, or low-depth sequencing (that is, 0.1× to 5×), referred to as low-passage whole-genome sequencing (LP-WGS), which may not detect individual mutations but can detect structural chromosomal changes including gains and losses (that is, CNAs). While similar strategies have shown favorable early results for specific sarcoma subtypes, LP-WGS has not been evaluated for applicability to the broader population of patients who have a sarcoma. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does an LP-WGS liquid biopsy evaluating for CNAs detect ctDNA in plasma samples from patients who have sarcomas representing a variety of histologic subtypes? METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a community-based, tertiary referral center. Nine paired (plasma and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] tissue) and four unpaired (plasma) specimens from patients who had a sarcoma were obtained from a commercial biospecimen bank. Three control specimens from individuals who did not have cancer were also obtained. The paired and unpaired specimens from patients who had a sarcoma represented a variety of sarcoma histologic subtypes. cfDNA was extracted, amplified, and quantified. Libraries were prepared, and LP-WGS was performed using a NextSeq 500 next-generation sequencing machine at a low depth of sequencing coverage (∼1×). The ichorCNA bioinformatics algorithm, which was designed to detect CNAs from low-depth genomic sequencing data, was used to analyze the data. In contrast with the gold standard for diagnosis in the form of histopathologic analysis of a tissue sample, this test does not discriminate between sarcoma subtypes but detects the presence of tumor-derived CNAs within the ctDNA in the blood that should not be present in a patient who does not have cancer. The liquid biopsy was positive for the detection of cancer if the ichorCNA algorithm detected the presence of ctDNA. The algorithm was also used to quantitatively estimate the percent ctDNA within the cfDNA. The concentration of ctDNA was then calculated from the percent ctDNA relative to the total concentration of cfDNA. The CNAs of the paired FFPE tissue and plasma samples were graphically visualized using aCNViewer software. RESULTS: This LP-WGS liquid biopsy detected ctDNA in 9 of 13 of the plasma specimens from patients with a sarcoma. The other four samples from patients with a sarcoma and all serum specimens from patients without cancer had no detectable ctDNA. Of those 9 patients with positive liquid biopsy results, the percent ctDNA ranged from 6% to 11%, and calculated ctDNA quantities were 0.04 to 5.6 ng/mL, which are levels to be expected when ctDNA is detectable. CONCLUSION: In this small pilot study, we were able to detect sarcoma ctDNA with an LP-WGS liquid biopsy searching for CNAs in the plasma of most patients who had a sarcoma representing a variety of histologic subtypes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results suggest that an LP-WGS liquid biopsy evaluating for CNAs to identify ctDNA may be more broadly applicable to the population of patients who have a sarcoma than previously reported in studies focusing on specific subtypes. Large prospective clinical trials that gather samples at multiple time points during the process of diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance will be needed to further assess whether this technique can be clinically useful. At our institution, we are in the process of developing a large prospective clinical trial for this purpose.
背景:液体活检是一种通过分析体液样本(最常见的是血液)来评估疾病状态的检测方法。近年来,液体活检方法在开发和临床应用方面取得了进展,以识别多种癌症类型基于血液的肿瘤特异性生物标志物。然而,这些技术在辅助肉瘤患者治疗方面的应用仍落后于癌症医学的其他领域。在本研究中,我们选择评估基于循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)的肉瘤液体活检。所有人类血液中都循环着正常的游离DNA(cfDNA)。与cfDNA不同,ctDNA是存在于血流中且来源于肿瘤的遗传物质。ctDNA携带肿瘤独特的基因组指纹,具有正常循环cfDNA中不存在的变化。成功的ctDNA液体活检必须能够靶向这些肿瘤特异性基因改变。例如,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变在肺癌中很常见,目前ctDNA液体活检已用于通过检测血液中的EGFR突变来评估肺癌患者的疾病状态。与许多癌不同,肉瘤没有常见的复发性突变可作为ctDNA液体活检的基础。然而,许多肉瘤的染色体有结构变化,包括部分或整条染色体的增减,即拷贝数改变(CNA),这可作为ctDNA液体活检的靶点。在某些脂肪性肿瘤或骨旁骨肉瘤中,鼠双微体2(MDM2)扩增就是由于12号染色体长臂一段的额外拷贝存在而导致的CNA的一个例子。由于大多数肉瘤表现出具有众多CNA的复杂核型,一种基于血液寻找这些CNA的液体活检策略可能能够检测到肉瘤ctDNA的存在。全基因组测序(WGS)是一种评估整个基因组的下一代测序技术。WGS的覆盖深度指测序的详细程度,就像显微镜的高倍与低倍。WGS可以进行高深度测序(即>60×),可检测单个点突变,也可以进行低深度测序(即0.1×至5×),称为低深度全基因组测序(LP-WGS),其可能无法检测单个突变,但可以检测包括增减(即CNA)在内的染色体结构变化。虽然类似策略已在特定肉瘤亚型中显示出良好的早期结果,但LP-WGS在更广泛的肉瘤患者群体中的适用性尚未得到评估。 问题/目的:评估CNA的LP-WGS液体活检能否在代表多种组织学亚型的肉瘤患者血浆样本中检测到ctDNA? 方法:这是一项在社区三级转诊中心进行的回顾性研究。从商业生物样本库中获取了9对(血浆和福尔马林固定石蜡包埋[FFPE]组织)以及4个未配对(血浆)的肉瘤患者标本。还获取了3个来自无癌症个体的对照标本。来自肉瘤患者的配对和未配对标本代表了多种肉瘤组织学亚型。提取、扩增并定量cfDNA。制备文库,并使用NextSeq 500下一代测序仪在低测序覆盖深度(约1×)下进行LP-WGS。使用旨在从低深度基因组测序数据中检测CNA的ichorCNA生物信息学算法分析数据。与组织样本组织病理学分析这种诊断金标准不同,该检测不区分肉瘤亚型,而是检测血液中ctDNA内肿瘤衍生CNA的存在,而无癌症患者血液中不应存在这种CNA。如果ichorCNA算法检测到ctDNA的存在,则液体活检检测癌症呈阳性。该算法还用于定量估计cfDNA中ctDNA的百分比。然后根据相对于cfDNA总浓度的ctDNA百分比计算ctDNA浓度。使用aCNViewer软件以图形方式可视化配对的FFPE组织和血浆样本的CNA。 结果:这种LP-WGS液体活检在13例肉瘤患者的血浆标本中的9例中检测到了ctDNA。另外4例肉瘤患者的样本以及所有无癌症患者的血清标本均未检测到可检测的ctDNA。在这9例液体活检结果为阳性的患者中,ctDNA百分比范围为6%至11%,计算出的ctDNA量为0.04至5.6 ng/mL,这是ctDNA可检测时预期的水平。 结论:在这项小型试点研究中,我们能够通过在大多数代表多种组织学亚型的肉瘤患者血浆中寻找CNA的LP-WGS液体活检检测到肉瘤ctDNA。 临床意义:这些结果表明,评估CNA以识别ctDNA的LP-WGS液体活检可能比之前针对特定亚型的研究所报道的更广泛适用于肉瘤患者群体。需要进行大型前瞻性临床试验,在诊断、治疗和监测过程中的多个时间点收集样本,以进一步评估该技术是否具有临床实用性。在我们机构,我们正在为此开展一项大型前瞻性临床试验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
Health Technol Assess. 2006-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025-1-1
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-8-25
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023-2-20
J Immunother Precis Oncol. 2020-6-5
Cancer Drug Resist. 2022-6-21
Int J Mol Sci. 2021-10-26
Biomedicines. 2021-9-26
Genome Med. 2021-5-31