Suppr超能文献

左束支起搏后新发左心室功能障碍。

New-Onset Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Left Bundle Branch Pacing.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai, India.

Department of Microbiology, Velammal Medical College and Research Institute, Madurai, India.

出版信息

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov;10(11):2494-2502. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.019. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) provides stable pacing parameters and has been suggested as an alternative for right ventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the incidence and etiology of new-onset left ventricular dysfunction (NOLVD) following LBBP in patients with baseline normal left ventricular (LV) function and cardiomyopathy patients with normalized LV function.

METHODS

Patients undergoing successful LBBP for symptomatic bradyarrhythmia or as an alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy were included. Normalization of LV function was defined as improvement in LV ejection fraction to ≥50%. Patients with baseline normal LV function and those with recovered LV function after LBBP constituted the study group. Loss of conduction system capture (LOCSC) was defined as complete or partial loss of right bundle branch delay pattern along with inability to demonstrate capture transition during threshold assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 426 patients were included; 59% (n = 250) had baseline normal LV function (group I) and 41% (n = 176) had recovered LV function after LBBP (group II). Mean follow-up duration of 28.3 ± 16.7 months. NOLVD was noted in 3.75% (n = 16; group I, n = 5, and group II, n = 11) of patients. The etiologies for NOLVD were LOCSC in 62.5% (n = 10), suboptimal atrioventricular (AV) delay in 18.7% (n = 3), atrial fibrillation in 6.3% (n = 1), and idiopathic in 12.5% (n = 2). LOCSC occurred at a mean interval of 9.2 ± 6.4 months after the initial implantation. Reinterventions (n = 6) including lead repositioning, AV delay optimization, and AV junction ablation resulted in renormalization of LV function in all 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodic assessment in device clinic is required because NOLVD from reversible causes can occur during follow-up in patients after LBBP.

摘要

背景

左束支起搏(LBBP)可提供稳定的起搏参数,已被提议作为右心室起搏和心脏再同步治疗的替代方法。

目的

本研究旨在评估基线左心室(LV)功能正常和 LV 功能正常的心肌病患者接受 LBBP 后新发左心室功能障碍(NOLVD)的发生率和病因。

方法

纳入因症状性心动过缓或作为心脏再同步治疗替代方法而行成功 LBBP 的患者。LV 功能正常定义为 LV 射血分数改善至≥50%。基线 LV 功能正常的患者和 LBBP 后 LV 功能恢复的患者构成研究组。丧失传导系统捕获(LOCSC)定义为完全或部分丧失右束支延迟模式,并且在阈值评估期间无法证明捕获转换。

结果

共纳入 426 例患者;59%(n=250)基线 LV 功能正常(组 I),41%(n=176)LBBP 后 LV 功能恢复(组 II)。平均随访时间 28.3±16.7 个月。3.75%(n=16;组 I 5 例,组 II 11 例)患者出现 NOLVD。NOLVD 的病因是 LOCSC 占 62.5%(n=10),房室(AV)延迟不理想占 18.7%(n=3),心房颤动占 6.3%(n=1),特发性占 12.5%(n=2)。初始植入后平均间隔 9.2±6.4 个月发生 LOCSC。6 例患者(n=6)进行了再介入(包括重新定位导联、优化 AV 延迟和 AV 结消融),所有患者的 LV 功能均恢复正常。

结论

LBBP 后患者随访期间可能因可逆原因出现 NOLVD,因此需要在器械诊所进行定期评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验