• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动吸烟会增加机器人增强视野完全腹膜外(eTEP)腹直肌后鞘腹疝修补术中伤口并发症的风险。

Active smoking increases risk of wound complications in robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) retro-rectus ventral hernia repairs.

作者信息

Koeller Eva, Liu Yao, Ortega-Goddard Emily, Giorgi Marcoandrea, Luhrs Andrew

机构信息

Brown University General Surgery Program and The Miriam Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7596-7603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11251-6. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11251-6
PMID:39340656
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking increases risk of complications after open hernia repair, however it is unknown whether this is true in minimally invasive hernia repair. We aim to determine whether there are differences in complication rates between smokers and non-smokers after robotic eTEP retrorectus repair.

METHODS

Our study included 102 patients who underwent robotic eTEP retrorectus repair of ventral hernias at a single institution from November 2019 to October 2022. Data collected included demographics, smoking status, operative details and outcomes. Patients were sorted into groups based on smoking status and outcomes were compared using ANOVA and chi-squared to test for significance.

RESULTS

Out of 102 patients, 18 were currently smoking, 38 were former smokers, 56 had ever smoked, 46 had never smoked and 84 were not currently smoking. Those who had ever smoked were more likely to endorse alcohol use compared to never smokers (60.7 vs 37%, p = 0.0169) and COPD was significantly more common in current smokers compared to not current smokers (p = 0.00025) and ever smokers compared to never smokers (p = 0.0037). Average follow up was 59.17 days and there was only one recurrence, which occurred in a never smoker. Initial analysis showed no difference in any complication. We excluded asymptomatic seromas that never required intervention due to clinical insignificance and repeat analysis showed current smokers had a significantly higher rate of surgical site occurrences (SSO) compared to patients not smoking at the time of their operation (p = 0.012). There was no difference between ever smokers and never smokers (p = 0.77). There remained no difference in any other complication.

CONCLUSION

Active smoking at the time of robotic eTEP increases the risk of clinically significant surgical site occurrences. This same increase is not seen in former smokers suggesting that smoking cessation should be encouraged before minimally invasive hernia repair.

摘要

背景

吸烟会增加开放性疝修补术后并发症的风险,然而在微创疝修补术中是否也是如此尚不清楚。我们旨在确定机器人经腹直肌后入路腹膜前疝修补术(eTEP)后吸烟者和非吸烟者的并发症发生率是否存在差异。

方法

我们的研究纳入了2019年11月至2022年10月在单一机构接受机器人eTEP腹侧疝修补术的102例患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、吸烟状况、手术细节和结果。根据吸烟状况将患者分组,并使用方差分析和卡方检验比较结果以检验显著性。

结果

在102例患者中,18例为当前吸烟者,38例为既往吸烟者,56例曾吸烟,46例从未吸烟,84例当前不吸烟。与从未吸烟者相比,曾吸烟者更有可能认可饮酒(60.7%对37%,p = 0.0169),与当前不吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)明显更常见(p = 0.00025),与从未吸烟者相比,曾吸烟者COPD也明显更常见(p = 0.0037)。平均随访59.17天,仅发生1例复发,发生在1例从未吸烟者中。初步分析显示任何并发症均无差异。我们排除了因临床意义不大而从未需要干预的无症状血清肿,再次分析显示,与手术时不吸烟的患者相比,当前吸烟者的手术部位事件(SSO)发生率显著更高(p = 0.012)。曾吸烟者和从未吸烟者之间无差异(p = 0.77)。其他任何并发症均无差异。

结论

机器人eTEP手术时主动吸烟会增加具有临床意义的手术部位事件的风险。既往吸烟者未出现同样的增加,这表明在微创疝修补术前应鼓励戒烟。

相似文献

1
Active smoking increases risk of wound complications in robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) retro-rectus ventral hernia repairs.主动吸烟会增加机器人增强视野完全腹膜外(eTEP)腹直肌后鞘腹疝修补术中伤口并发症的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7596-7603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11251-6. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
Robotic retromuscular hernia repair optimizes short-term outcomes in higher risk patients.机器人辅助肌后疝修补术可优化高风险患者的短期治疗效果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2828-2835. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11630-7. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
3
Comparing procedural costs and early clinical outcomes of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for midline ventral hernias.比较机器人辅助完全腹膜外(eTEP)与腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中线腹疝的手术成本和早期临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11319-3. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
4
Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs.腹腔镜和机器人增强视野完全腹膜外(eTEP)入路经直肠后修补术的疗效比较回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3597-3605. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07132-y. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
End-Tidal CO During Enhanced-View Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair: A Comparison of Retrorectus and Intraperitoneal Insufflation.气腹与免气腹在完全腹膜外疝修补术中对呼气末二氧化碳分压的影响:经腹膜前入路与经腹腔入路的比较。
J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:857-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
6
A comparison of robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal approach versus trans-abdominal retro-muscular approach for midline ventral hernias.机器人增强视图全腹膜外入路与经腹肌后入路治疗中线腹侧疝的比较。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1719-1726. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03042-8. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
7
Early postoperative outcomes in a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (r-eTEP) and extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia.在一项针对腹疝的机器人扩大完全腹膜外修补术(r-eTEP)与扩大完全腹膜外修补术(eTEP)的回顾性倾向评分匹配比较中的早期术后结果。
Hernia. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03293-z.
8
Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair.内镜(经脐单孔腹腔镜入路)机器人辅助肌后腹壁疝修补术的早期手术结果
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):837-847. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1795-z. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
From transabdominal to totally extra-peritoneal robotic ventral hernia repair: observations and outcomes.从经腹到完全腹膜外机器人腹外疝修补术:观察与结果。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):635-643. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02767-2. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
10
Short-term complications after minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair: no need for preoperative weight loss or smoking cessation?微创经肌后腹疝修补术后的短期并发症:术前无需减肥或戒烟?
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1315-1323. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02663-1. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality and Severe Complications Among Newly Graduated Surgeons in the United States.美国新毕业外科医生的死亡率和严重并发症情况
Ann Surg. 2024 Apr 1;279(4):555-560. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006128. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Emergency repair and smoking predict recurrence in a large cohort of ventral hernia patients.紧急修复和吸烟可预测大样本腹疝患者的复发。
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1337-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02672-0. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
Short-term complications after minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair: no need for preoperative weight loss or smoking cessation?
微创经肌后腹疝修补术后的短期并发症:术前无需减肥或戒烟?
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1315-1323. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02663-1. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for Mesh infection following Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair Surgery.系统评价和荟萃分析腹壁疝修补术后网片感染的危险因素。
Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt A):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.024. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
5
Should seroma be considered a complication?血清肿应被视为一种并发症吗?
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):377-378. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02385-w. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction.腹部壁重建患者的术后康复加强路径。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):849-853. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
The effect of smoking on 30-day outcomes in elective hernia repair.吸烟对择期疝修补术 30 天结局的影响。
Am J Surg. 2018 Sep;216(3):471-474. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair.EuraHS:一个国际腹部前壁疝修复注册和结果测量在线平台的发展。
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):239-50. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0912-7. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
9
Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术中的伤口愈合与感染。吸烟及戒烟对临床的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Arch Surg. 2012 Apr;147(4):373-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.5.