• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

40岁以上患者自体移植和异体移植前交叉韧带重建的短期患者报告结局相似,但接受异体移植的患者前交叉韧带移植物失败率更高。

Autograft and Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years Have Similar Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes With Greater Rates of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure in Patients Who Receive Allograft.

作者信息

Kleinsmith Rebekah M, Doxey Stephen A, Huyke-Hernández Fernando A, Only Arthur J, Kweon Christopher Y, Cunningham Brian P

机构信息

TRIA Orthopaedic Center, Bloomington, Minnesota, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2024 Sep 26. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.034.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.034
PMID:39341263
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate short-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients aged 40 years and older after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between patients who received allograft or autograft. Secondary aims included assessing the effect of preexisting osteoarthritis on short-term PROs.

METHODS

A retrospective review of an ambulatory surgery center's electronic medical record was conducted for patients who underwent primary ACLR between 2009 and 2022. Patients aged younger than 40 years, those who underwent index revision procedures and/or concomitant ligament repair/reconstructions, and those with incomplete baseline or short-term (1- or 2-year) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) scores were excluded. Patients who received allograft or autograft were matched according to sex and body mass index in a 2:1 fashion. PROs used included KOOS and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at baseline and short-term follow-up (minimum of 1 year). Minimum clinically important difference was calculated in a distribution-based fashion. Osteoarthritis severity was determined on the basis of Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading of perioperative knee radiographs. Preexisting osteoarthritis was defined as KL grade 1 or more.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients were included after matching (215 allograft and 116 autograft patients). The average age was 47.7 ± 6.0 years (range 40-66 years). Age differed significantly between the 2 groups, with the allograft cohort having an average age of 48.6 ± 6.0 years and the autograft cohort having an average age of 46.1 ± 5.7 years (P < .001). Short-term change in KOOS and SANE scores did not differ by graft type (P = .154, P = .556, respectively). Sixty-seven percent of all patients met minimum clinically important difference for KOOS and 82% of patients with complete baseline and short-term SANE scores met minimum clinically important difference for SANE. There was a statistically significant difference in rupture rates between the allograft and autograft cohorts (n = 9 allograft vs n = 0 autograft; P = .030). There was no difference in reoperation rates between the autograft and allograft cohorts (P = .453). Perioperative KL grading did not affect outcomes for either graft type (allograft: P = .905 vs autograft: P = .522).

CONCLUSIONS

Middle-aged patients undergoing ACLR with allograft or autograft demonstrate similar short-term PROs. Preexisting osteoarthritis similarly did not significantly affect short-term outcomes. However, rerupture rates were significantly greater in the allograft cohort than the autograft cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic, retrospective, case control study.

摘要

目的

评估40岁及以上患者在接受同种异体移植物或自体移植物进行初次前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后的短期患者报告结局(PROs)。次要目的包括评估术前骨关节炎对短期PROs的影响。

方法

对一家门诊手术中心2009年至2022年间接受初次ACLR的患者的电子病历进行回顾性研究。排除年龄小于40岁的患者、接受初次翻修手术和/或同期韧带修复/重建的患者,以及基线或短期(1年或2年)膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)不完整的患者。接受同种异体移植物或自体移植物的患者按性别和体重指数以2:1的方式进行匹配。使用的PROs包括基线和短期随访(至少1年)时的KOOS和单项评估数字评价(SANE)。以基于分布的方式计算最小临床重要差异。根据围手术期膝关节X线片的Kellgren-Lawrence(KL)分级确定骨关节炎严重程度。术前骨关节炎定义为KL分级为1级或更高。

结果

匹配后共纳入331例患者(215例同种异体移植物患者和116例自体移植物患者)。平均年龄为47.7±6.0岁(范围40 - 66岁)。两组患者年龄差异显著,同种异体移植物队列的平均年龄为48.6±6.0岁,自体移植物队列的平均年龄为46.1±5.7岁(P <.001)。KOOS和SANE评分的短期变化在移植物类型之间无差异(分别为P =.154,P =.556)。所有患者中有67%达到KOOS的最小临床重要差异,82%基线和短期SANE评分完整的患者达到SANE的最小临床重要差异。同种异体移植物和自体移植物队列之间的破裂率存在统计学显著差异(同种异体移植物n = 9例 vs 自体移植物n = 0例;P =.030)。自体移植物和同种异体移植物队列之间的再次手术率无差异(P =.453)。围手术期KL分级对两种移植物类型结局均无影响(同种异体移植物:P =.905 vs 自体移植物:P =.522)。

结论

接受同种异体移植物或自体移植物进行ACLR的中年患者表现出相似的短期PROs。术前骨关节炎同样未显著影响短期结局。然而,同种异体移植物队列的再次破裂率显著高于自体移植物队列。

证据水平

III级,治疗性,回顾性,病例对照研究。

相似文献

1
Autograft and Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years Have Similar Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes With Greater Rates of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure in Patients Who Receive Allograft.40岁以上患者自体移植和异体移植前交叉韧带重建的短期患者报告结局相似,但接受异体移植的患者前交叉韧带移植物失败率更高。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Sep 26. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.034.
2
Risk of Retear Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Hybrid Graft of Autograft Augmented With Allograft Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建术中使用自体移植物增强同种异体组织的混合移植物后再撕裂的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2927-2935. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.044. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
3
Long-term results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft with a minimum follow-up of 10 years-a systematic review.前交叉韧带重建使用髌腱和自体腘绳肌腱移植物的 10 年以上长期结果:系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4277-4289. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04687-9. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后自体移植物与异体移植物稳定性的荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Jul;15(7):851-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0328-6. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
5
A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft.自体移植物与同种异体移植物在前交叉韧带重建中的系统评价。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2242-50. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00610.
6
Comparison of failure rates and functional outcomes between hamstring autografts and hybrid grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建中腘绳肌腱自体移植物与混合移植物的失败率和功能结果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Oct;109(6):103499. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103499. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
7
Risk factors for ACL revision failure and optimum graft size for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带翻修失败的危险因素及翻修前交叉韧带重建的最佳移植物尺寸
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 19;35(1):260. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04381-7.
8
Lower donor site morbidity with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autograft compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前交叉韧带重建后,与髌腱骨-骨移植物相比,使用腘绳肌腱和股四头肌腱自体移植物可降低供体部位发病率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3339-3352. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07402-2. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
9
"Proprietary Processed" Allografts: Clinical Outcomes and Biomechanical Properties in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.“专有处理”同种异体移植物:前交叉韧带重建的临床结果和生物力学特性
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3158-3167. doi: 10.1177/0363546516687540. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
10
Higher revision and secondary surgery rates after ACL reconstruction in athletes under 16 compared to those over 16: a case-control study.16岁以下运动员与16岁以上运动员相比,前交叉韧带重建术后的翻修率和二次手术率更高:一项病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 17;20(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05935-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined revision ACL reconstruction with slope-correction osteotomy and lateral extra-articular tenodesis improves stability in patients with high posterior tibial slope and pivot shift.联合翻修前交叉韧带重建与斜度矫正截骨术及外侧关节外肌腱固定术可改善胫骨后倾角度大及存在轴移的患者的稳定性。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 24;12(3):e70384. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70384. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Enhancing ACL reconstruction: augmented hamstring allograft with high-strength sutures for superior graft stability.增强前交叉韧带重建:使用高强度缝线的异体腘绳肌腱移植以提高移植物稳定性。
J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Apr 21;2025(4):rjaf013. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf013. eCollection 2025 Apr.