• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diabetes knowledge, attitudes and practices among Chinese primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study.中国基层医生的糖尿病知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 28;25(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02600-4.
2
Primary care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to prediabetes in China: A cross-sectional study.中国基层医疗保健提供者与糖尿病前期相关的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;11:1086147. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1086147. eCollection 2023.
3
Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of primary health physicians towards glucose self-monitoring in patients with type2 diabetes mellitus in Palestine.巴勒斯坦基层医疗医生对2型糖尿病患者自我血糖监测的知识、态度和实践
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 10;26(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02720-5.
4
Meta-analysis of KAP toward COVID-19 in Chinese residents.中文居民对 COVID-19 的知信行的 Meta 分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;12:1279293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1279293. eCollection 2024.
5
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of the Chinese public with respect to coronavirus disease (COVID-19): an online cross-sectional survey.中国公众对冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的认知、态度和行为:一项在线横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1816. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09961-2.
6
Survey of primary care providers' knowledge of screening for, diagnosing and managing prediabetes.初级保健提供者对糖尿病前期的筛查、诊断和管理的知识调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Nov;32(11):1172-1178. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4103-1. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
Diabetes care knowledge and practice among primary care physicians in Southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.尼日利亚东南部初级保健医生的糖尿病护理知识和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01202-0.
8
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of intensive care unit physicians towards the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome in China: a cross-sectional survey.中国重症监护病房医生对急性呼吸窘迫综合征管理的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):e092069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092069.
9
Knowledge, attitude and practices associated with COVID-19 among undergraduate students from Malaysian public universities during the endemic phase: a cross-sectional study.马来西亚公立大学本科生在疫情流行阶段对新冠病毒的认知、态度和行为:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 9;25(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19834-7.
10
Primary care physicians' satisfaction after health care reform: a cross-sectional study from two cities in Central Java, Indonesia.医疗改革后基层医疗医生的满意度:来自印度尼西亚爪哇中部两个城市的横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 8;19(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4121-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Achievement of Guideline-Recommended Targets in Diabetes Care in China : A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.中国糖尿病护理中指南推荐目标的达成情况:一项全国性横断面研究
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Aug;176(8):1037-1046. doi: 10.7326/M23-0442. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Primary care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to prediabetes in China: A cross-sectional study.中国基层医疗保健提供者与糖尿病前期相关的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;11:1086147. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1086147. eCollection 2023.
3
8. Obesity and Weight Management for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.8. 肥胖和体重管理以预防和治疗 2 型糖尿病:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S128-S139. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S008.
4
11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.11. 慢性肾脏病与风险管理:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S191-S202. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S011.
5
3. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.3. 2 型糖尿病及其合并症的预防或延缓:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S41-S48. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S003.
6
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.10. 心血管疾病与风险管理:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S158-S190. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S010.
7
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断:2022 年糖尿病医疗护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S17-S38. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S002.
8
Resource Use Among Diabetes Patients Who Mainly Visit Primary Care Physicians Versus Medical Specialists: a Retrospective Cohort Study.主要就诊于基层医疗机构医生和医疗专家的糖尿病患者的资源利用情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):283-289. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06710-y. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
9
Diabetes care knowledge and practice among primary care physicians in Southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.尼日利亚东南部初级保健医生的糖尿病护理知识和实践:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01202-0.
10
Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study.中国 2018 年美国糖尿病协会诊断标准下的中国大陆糖尿病患病率:全国横断面研究。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m997.

中国基层医生的糖尿病知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。

Diabetes knowledge, attitudes and practices among Chinese primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi, 541199, P.R. China.

National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Ministry of Education, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 28;25(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02600-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02600-4
PMID:39342244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11438114/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a public health crisis that requires adequate knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) by health care providers to prevent or delay the progression of the disease. This study aimed to assess the KAP regarding T2DM among primary care providers (PCPs) in Central China.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 971 PCPs using self-employed KAP questionnaires. Questionnaires were designed to evaluate KAP regarding T2DM among PCPs, and was measured with SPSS software. Descriptive statistics, the Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression models used to analyze the data.70%, 80% and 70% of total values were considered as the cut-off point for defining good knowledge, positive attitude and correct practice.

RESULTS

A total of 971 PCPs with a mean age of 44.0 ± 10.2 years were evaluated. 620 (63.9%) PCPs worked at village clinic and 605 (62.3%) PCPs have been working more than 20 years. Only 26.3% of the respondents participated in Continued Medical Education (CME) programs regarding diabetes in the past year due to Covid-19 pandemic. Overall, despite positive attitudes toward diabetes, there were substantial gaps in knowledge and practices. The PCPs scored 7.25 out of 14 points on the knowledge subscales, 7.13 out of 8 on the attitude subscales, and 4.85 out of 11 on the practice subscales. Gender, age, practice setting, professional titles, duration of practice and CME attendance were significant predictors of knowledge; Age, practice setting and duration of practice were significant predictors of attitudes; and family history of diabetes affected PCP practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite positive attitudes toward diabetes, there were substantial gaps in knowledge and practices. These findings call for action from relevant health authorities and policy makers to improve PCPs' KAP regarding diabetes in Central China.

摘要

背景

2 型糖尿病(T2DM)是一场公共健康危机,需要医疗保健提供者具备足够的知识、态度和实践(KAP),以预防或延缓疾病的进展。本研究旨在评估中国中部地区基层医疗提供者(PCP)对 T2DM 的 KAP。

方法

本研究采用自我管理 KAP 问卷,对 971 名 PCP 进行了多中心横断面研究。问卷旨在评估 PCP 对 T2DM 的 KAP,并使用 SPSS 软件进行测量。采用描述性统计、皮尔逊相关系数和多元回归模型进行数据分析。将总得分的 70%、80%和 70%分别定义为良好知识、积极态度和正确实践的分界点。

结果

共评估了 971 名年龄为 44.0±10.2 岁的 PCP。620 名(63.9%)PCP 在村诊所工作,605 名(62.3%)PCP 工作年限超过 20 年。由于新冠疫情,过去一年只有 26.3%的受访者参加过糖尿病继续教育(CME)项目。总的来说,尽管对糖尿病持积极态度,但知识和实践仍存在较大差距。PCP 在知识子量表上得分为 14 分中的 7.25 分,在态度子量表上得分为 8 分中的 7.13 分,在实践子量表上得分为 11 分中的 4.85 分。性别、年龄、实践环境、职称、从业年限和 CME 参加情况是知识的显著预测因素;年龄、实践环境和从业年限是态度的显著预测因素;糖尿病家族史影响 PCP 的实践。

结论

尽管对糖尿病持积极态度,但知识和实践仍存在较大差距。这些发现呼吁相关卫生当局和政策制定者采取行动,提高中国中部地区 PCP 对糖尿病的 KAP。