• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合社会学习和网络形成,推动社会朝着可持续的未来发展。

Integrating social learning and network formation for social tipping towards a sustainable future.

机构信息

Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Dec;60:101915. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101915. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101915
PMID:39342794
Abstract

Numerous psychological biases shape how we respond to observing others conforming to or diverging from social norms. Depending on our social networks, we may be more influenced by societal majorities, such as the widespread consumption of meat or frequent air travel, or by the sustainable lifestyles of our closest friends. The evolution of social norms is shaped by personal preferences, values, beliefs, and the structure of social networks. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for promoting a cultural shift towards sustainability, yet our grasp of how normative transformations occur remains limited. In this paper, we simulate an agent-based model in which agents choose between maintaining the status quo or adopting an alternative, engaging in a coordination game. Our model illustrates that interventions aimed at changing individual preferences may fail if the population is structured in polarised networks, where agents with similar preferences cluster together and primarily interact within their groups. These echo chambers limit the effectiveness of preference-based interventions. However, we show that a subsequent intervention that increases the salience of behaviours from agents with dissimilar preferences can successfully tip the population from a status quo equilibrium to an alternative norm equilibrium. This paper outlines the challenges policymakers face in designing interventions for catalysing positive social norm changes. We argue for a reevaluation of current methodologies for modelling and empirically investigating norm change. Our primary recommendation for future research is a more comprehensive incorporation of the myriad ways individuals respond to social information and network formation.

摘要

许多心理偏见影响着我们对他人遵守或偏离社会规范的反应方式。根据我们的社交网络,我们可能更容易受到社会主流的影响,例如广泛消费肉类或频繁乘坐飞机,或者受到我们最亲密朋友的可持续生活方式的影响。社会规范的演变受到个人偏好、价值观、信仰和社交网络结构的影响。了解这些动态对于推动向可持续性转变至关重要,但我们对规范转变如何发生的理解仍然有限。在本文中,我们模拟了一个基于代理的模型,其中代理在维持现状或采用替代方案之间进行选择,参与协调博弈。我们的模型表明,如果人口结构在极化网络中,其中具有相似偏好的代理聚集在一起并主要在其群体内相互作用,那么旨在改变个人偏好的干预措施可能会失败。这些回音室限制了基于偏好的干预措施的有效性。然而,我们表明,随后的干预措施可以提高具有不同偏好的代理的行为的突出性,从而成功地将人口从现状均衡推向替代规范均衡。本文概述了政策制定者在设计促进积极社会规范转变的干预措施时面临的挑战。我们主张重新评估当前用于模拟和实证研究规范变化的方法。我们对未来研究的主要建议是更全面地纳入个人对社会信息和网络形成的各种反应方式。

相似文献

1
Integrating social learning and network formation for social tipping towards a sustainable future.整合社会学习和网络形成,推动社会朝着可持续的未来发展。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Dec;60:101915. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101915. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
2
Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics.建模社会规范:规范效用方法与信念动态的整合。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230027. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0027. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Predicting social tipping and norm change in controlled experiments.预测控制实验中的社会临界点和规范变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014893118.
4
When norm change hurts.当规范改变造成伤害时。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230039. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0039. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Norm Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Social Norm Emergence, Persistence, and Change.规范动力学:社会规范涌现、持续和变化的跨学科视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;75:341-378. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-013319. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
6
Social norm change: drivers and consequences.社会规范的改变:驱动因素与后果。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230023. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0023. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Scaling Up Change: A Critical Review and Practical Guide to Harnessing Social Norms for Climate Action.规模化变革:利用社会规范促进气候行动的批判性回顾与实用指南。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2022 Oct;23(2):50-97. doi: 10.1177/15291006221105279.
8
A research agenda for the study of social norm change.社会规范变化研究议程
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jul 11;380(2227):20200411. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0411. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
The Emergence of Social Norms and Conventions.社会规范和惯例的出现。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):158-169. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Learning how to behave: cognitive learning processes account for asymmetries in adaptation to social norms.学习如何行动:认知学习过程解释了适应社会规范中的不对称现象。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jun 9;288(1952):20210293. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0293. Epub 2021 Jun 2.