Laboratory of Energy and Environment - LEMA, Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Petrobras Research Center - CENPES, 21941-915, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122638. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122638. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
The oil industry is facing substantial environmental challenges, especially in managing waste streams such as Oilfield Produced Water (OPW), which represents a significant component of the industrial ecological footprint. Conventional treatment methods often fail to effectively remove dissolved oils and grease compounds, leading to operational difficulties and incomplete remediation. Electrochemical oxidation (EO) has emerged as a promising alternative due to its operational simplicity and ability to degrade pollutants directly and indirectly, which has already been applied in treating several effluents containing organic compounds. The application of EO treatment for OPW is still in an initial stage, due to the intricate nature of this matrix and scattered information about it. This study provides a technological overview of EO technology for OPW treatment, from laboratory scale to the development of large-scale prototypes, identifying design and process parameters that can potentially permit high efficiency, applicability, and commercial deployment. Research in this domain has demonstrated notable rates of removal of recalcitrant pollutants (>90%), utilizing active and non-active electrodes. Electro-generated active species, primarily from chloride, play a pivotal role in the oxidation of organic compounds. However, the highly saline conditions in OPW hinder the complete mineralization of these organics, which can be improved by using non-active anodes and lower salinity levels. The performance of electrodes greatly influences the efficiency and effectiveness of OPW treatment. Various factors must be considered when selecting the electrode material, such as its conductivity, stability, surface area, corrosion resistance, and cost. Additionally, the specific contaminants present in the OPW, and their electrochemical reactivity must be considered to ensure optimal treatment outcomes. Balancing these considerations can be challenging, but it is crucial for achieving successful OPW treatment. Active electrode materials exhibit a high affinity for chloride molecules, generating more active species than non-active materials, which exhibit more significant degradation potential due to the production of hydroxyl radicals. Regarding scale-up, key challenges include low current efficiency, the formation of by-products, electrode deactivation, and limitations in mass transfer. To address these issues, enhanced mass transfer rates and appropriate residence times can be achieved using flow-through mesh anodes and moderate current densities, which have proven to be the optimal configuration for this process.
石油行业面临着重大的环境挑战,特别是在管理油田采出水(OPW)等废水方面,因为 OPW 是工业生态足迹的重要组成部分。传统的处理方法往往无法有效地去除溶解的油和油脂化合物,导致操作困难和不完全修复。电化学氧化(EO)因其操作简单以及能够直接和间接降解污染物而成为一种很有前途的替代方法,它已经应用于处理含有有机化合物的几种废水。由于 OPW 基质的复杂性和分散的信息,EO 处理 OPW 的应用仍处于初始阶段。本研究从实验室规模到大型原型的开发,提供了 EO 技术处理 OPW 的技术概述,确定了可能允许高效率、适用性和商业部署的设计和工艺参数。该领域的研究表明,使用活性和非活性电极,可以显著去除难处理的污染物(>90%)。电生成的活性物质,主要来自氯,在有机化合物的氧化中起着关键作用。然而,OPW 中的高盐度条件阻碍了这些有机物的完全矿化,可以通过使用非活性阳极和降低盐度水平来改善。电极的性能极大地影响 OPW 处理的效率和效果。在选择电极材料时,必须考虑到各种因素,例如其导电性、稳定性、表面积、耐腐蚀性和成本。此外,还必须考虑 OPW 中存在的特定污染物及其电化学反应性,以确保获得最佳的处理效果。平衡这些考虑因素可能具有挑战性,但对于实现成功的 OPW 处理至关重要。活性电极材料对氯分子具有高亲和力,比非活性材料产生更多的活性物质,由于产生了羟基自由基,非活性材料具有更大的降解潜力。在扩大规模方面,关键挑战包括低电流效率、副产物的形成、电极失活和传质限制。为了解决这些问题,可以通过使用流通过滤网阳极和适度的电流密度来提高传质速率和适当的停留时间,事实证明,这种过程的最佳配置是使用流通过滤网阳极和适度的电流密度。