Pennington Becky M, Alava Mónica Hernández, Strong Mark
Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
Value Health. 2025 Jan;28(1):138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Decision models for economic evaluation are increasingly including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for informal/unpaid carers, but these estimates often come from poor quality data and typically rely on cross-sectional analysis. We aimed to identify within-person effects using longitudinal analysis of 13 waves of Understanding Society (the UK Household Longitudinal Survey).
We analyzed data for coresident carer and care-recipient dyads, where the carer reported "looking after or giving special help to" the care recipient in any of the 13 waves. We used fixed-effects models to study the effects of caring for the care recipient (the "caregiving" effect) using volume of care (hours per week) and continuous duration of caregiving (years) and caring about the care recipient (the "family" effect) using the care recipient's HRQoL on the carer's HRQoL. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form 6 Dimension, calculated from the Short Form 12.
We found consistent evidence for the family effect: improving care recipient's HRQoL by 0.1 would improve carer's HRQoL by approximately 0.012. We also consistently found evidence of a small but statistically significant decrement to carer's HRQoL for each additional year of caring. These findings were robust to scenario analyses. Evidence for the relationship between volume of care and carer's HRQoL was less clear.
We propose that our estimates can be used to populate economic models to predict changes in carers' HRQoL over time and allow disutilities to be estimated separately for the family and caregiving effect.
用于经济评估的决策模型越来越多地纳入了非正式/无薪照料者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),但这些估计值往往来自质量较差的数据,并且通常依赖于横断面分析。我们旨在通过对《理解社会》(英国家庭纵向调查)的13个波次进行纵向分析来确定个体内部效应。
我们分析了共同居住的照料者与受照料者二元组的数据,其中照料者在13个波次中的任何一个波次报告“照顾或给予受照料者特别帮助”。我们使用固定效应模型,通过照料量(每周小时数)和持续照料时间(年)来研究照料受照料者的效应(“照料”效应),并通过受照料者的HRQoL来研究对照料者HRQoL的关心效应(“家庭”效应)。HRQoL使用从简短健康调查问卷12计算得出的简短健康调查问卷6维度进行测量。
我们发现了关于家庭效应的一致证据:受照料者的HRQoL每提高0.1,照料者的HRQoL将提高约0.012。我们还始终发现,照料每增加一年,照料者的HRQoL会有小幅但在统计学上显著的下降。这些发现对情景分析具有稳健性。照料量与照料者HRQoL之间关系的证据不太明确。
我们建议,我们的估计值可用于填充经济模型,以预测照料者HRQoL随时间的变化,并允许分别估计家庭效应和照料效应的负效用。