• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析运动队中的关系动态:社会关系模型入门

Unraveling relationship dynamics in sports teams: A primer on the social relations model.

作者信息

Loeys Tom, De Clerck Tom, Haerens Leen

机构信息

Department of Data-analysis, Ghent University, Belgium.

Department of Movement & Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025 Jan;76:102752. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102752. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102752
PMID:39343189
Abstract

Interpersonal behavior in sports teams are inherently intricate. The Social Relations Model (SRM) presents a compelling framework to conceptualize and dissect these complexities, enabling the empirical testing of theories concerning relationships within group settings. The SRM decomposes dyadic measurements obtained from a round-robin design into components at the individual (actor and partner) level, relationship level, and team level. Leveraging data on need satisfaction, as experienced by the coach, team captain and two other athletes in relation to each other across 96 sports teams, we showcase the application of the SRM. A step-by-step introduction to the implementation of the model in R is provided. We elucidate how the SRM facilitates the investigation of research questions that deepen our understanding of team dynamics. Our illustration reveals that while the team effect exhibits minimal explanatory power over variability, substantial variability in need satisfaction is accounted for by both individual factors (actor and partner) and relationship effects. Notably, considerable differences are observed between sports teams in the extent to which coaches elicited need satisfaction in their team members. On average, coaches elicit lower levels of need satisfaction compared to other team members. Reciprocal relationships are evident in the team captain-athlete dyad and the athlete-athlete dyad, but not in dyadic relationships with the coach. In sum, this tutorial illustrates how analyzing dyadic data from a round-robin design using the SRM can enhance our understanding of dyadic relationship data within sports teams.

摘要

运动队中的人际行为本质上错综复杂。社会关系模型(SRM)提供了一个引人注目的框架,用于概念化和剖析这些复杂性,从而能够对有关群体环境中人际关系的理论进行实证检验。SRM将从循环赛设计中获得的二元测量分解为个体(行为者和伙伴)层面、关系层面和团队层面的组成部分。利用96个运动队中教练、队长和其他两名运动员相互之间体验到的需求满足数据,我们展示了SRM的应用。提供了在R中实施该模型的逐步介绍。我们阐明了SRM如何促进对研究问题的调查,这些问题加深了我们对团队动态的理解。我们的例证表明,虽然团队效应对变异性的解释力最小,但需求满足的大量变异性是由个体因素(行为者和伙伴)和关系效应共同造成的。值得注意的是,在教练激发团队成员需求满足的程度方面,运动队之间存在相当大的差异。平均而言,与其他团队成员相比,教练激发的需求满足水平较低。队长与运动员二元组以及运动员与运动员二元组中存在互惠关系,但与教练的二元关系中不存在。总之,本教程说明了如何使用SRM分析循环赛设计中的二元数据,可以增强我们对运动队中二元关系数据的理解。

相似文献

1
Unraveling relationship dynamics in sports teams: A primer on the social relations model.解析运动队中的关系动态:社会关系模型入门
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025 Jan;76:102752. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102752. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
2
Effects of big-five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach-athlete dyads.大五人格特质对中国教练-运动员二元组中关系质量和满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):568-80. doi: 10.1111/sms.12329. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
3
Toward a multidimensional model of athletes' commitment to coach-athlete relationships and interdependent sport teams: a substantive-methodological synergy.迈向运动员对教练 - 运动员关系及相互依存运动队承诺的多维模型:一种实质性 - 方法论的协同作用。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014 Feb;36(1):52-68. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0038.
4
An attachment theory perspective in the examination of relational processes associated with coach-athlete dyads.从依恋理论视角考察与教练-运动员对关系相关的过程。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013 Apr;35(2):156-67. doi: 10.1123/jsep.35.2.156.
5
On the same page in sporting dyads: does dissimilarity on 2 x 2 achievement goal constructs impair relationship functioning?在运动对偶中意见一致:2×2 成就目标结构上的差异是否会损害关系功能?
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Dec;32(6):805-27. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.6.805.
6
When You Can't Play Sports: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Motivational and Emotional Experiences in Coach-Athlete Dyads.当你无法进行体育运动时:COVID-19 大流行对教练-运动员二人组中动机和情感体验的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13944. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113944.
7
Coaching competency and satisfaction with the coach: a multi-level structural equation model.教练能力和对教练的满意度:多层次结构方程模型。
J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):411-22. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.538710.
8
Interpersonal Mechanisms Explaining the Transfer of Well- and Ill-Being in Coach-Athlete Dyads.解释教练-运动员二元组中幸福感与不幸福感传递的人际机制。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016 Jun;38(3):292-304. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0172.
9
The Art of Athlete Leadership: Identifying High-Quality Athlete Leadership at the Individual and Team Level Through Social Network Analysis.运动员领导力的艺术:通过社交网络分析在个人和团队层面识别高质量的运动员领导力。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2015 Jun;37(3):274-90. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2014-0259.
10
Association between coach-athlete relationship and athlete engagement in Chinese team sports: The mediating effect of thriving.教练-运动员关系与中国团队运动中运动员投入的关系:繁荣的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0289979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289979. eCollection 2023.