• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教练能力和对教练的满意度:多层次结构方程模型。

Coaching competency and satisfaction with the coach: a multi-level structural equation model.

机构信息

Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124-2040, USA.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):411-22. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.538710.

DOI:10.1080/02640414.2010.538710
PMID:21184342
Abstract

The purpose of this initial predictive validity study was to determine the ability of measures derived from the Athletes' Perceptions of Coaching Competency Scale II - High School Teams (APCCS II-HST) to predict satisfaction with the head coach. Specification of the statistical model was informed by the mediational model of coach-athlete interactions. The technical quality of the satisfaction measure was evaluated before testing the predictive validity of the coaching competency measures. Data were collected from athletes of seven sports. Athlete observations (N = 748) were clustered within teams (G = 74). Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) provided evidence for factorial invariance of a reduced version of the satisfaction measure by athlete gender. Multi-level CFA provided evidence of model-data consistency for a reduced version of the satisfaction measure. Multi-level structural equation modelling provided evidence for the ability of latent coaching competency to positively predict latent satisfaction at both the athlete level (technique competency and motivation competency) and the team level (coaching competency) and for close model-data fit. Implications of this study include: that the APCCS II-HST should be viewed as a replacement for the Coaching Competency Scale when the intended population is appropriate; a preliminary multi-level measurement model for satisfaction with one's coach that should be considered as a potential starting point in subsequent studies; and empirical support for a key relationship proposed in the mediational model of coach-athlete interactions.

摘要

本初始预测有效性研究的目的是确定源自运动员对教练能力感知量表 II-高中队(APCCS II-HST)的测量结果预测对主教练满意度的能力。教练-运动员互动的中介模型为统计模型的规范提供了信息。在测试教练能力测量的预测有效性之前,对满意度测量的技术质量进行了评估。数据来自七项运动的运动员。运动员观察(N=748)按团队(G=74)进行聚类。多组验证性因素分析(CFA)为按运动员性别对满意度测量的简化版进行因子不变性提供了证据。多层次 CFA 为满意度测量的简化版提供了模型数据一致性的证据。多层次结构方程模型为潜在教练能力能够积极预测运动员层面(技术能力和激励能力)和团队层面(教练能力)的潜在满意度以及接近模型数据拟合提供了证据。这项研究的意义包括:当目标人群合适时,APCCS II-HST 应被视为替代教练能力量表的工具;一个用于评估对教练满意度的初步多层次测量模型,应被视为后续研究的潜在起点;以及对教练-运动员互动中介模型中提出的关键关系的实证支持。

相似文献

1
Coaching competency and satisfaction with the coach: a multi-level structural equation model.教练能力和对教练的满意度:多层次结构方程模型。
J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):411-22. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.538710.
2
What makes coaches tick? The impact of coaches' intrinsic and extrinsic motives on their own satisfaction and that of their athletes.教练的动力源自何处?教练的内在和外在动机对其自身满意度以及运动员满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Oct;18(5):664-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00705.x. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
3
Proposed modifications to the conceptual model of coaching efficacy and additional validity evidence for the Coaching Efficacy Scale II-High School Teams.教练效能概念模型的修改建议及《教练效能量表第二版-高中团队》的补充效度证据。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Mar;82(1):79-88. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599724.
4
The coach-athlete relationship: a motivational model.教练与运动员的关系:一种激励模型。
J Sports Sci. 2003 Nov;21(11):883-904. doi: 10.1080/0264041031000140374.
5
Psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q).教练-运动员关系问卷(CART-Q)的比利时教练版本的心理测量特性。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20(5):779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01020.x.
6
Athletes' perceptions of coaching competency and team conflict in sport teams: A multilevel analysis.运动员对运动团队中教练能力和团队冲突的看法:多层次分析。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Jul;18(6):851-860. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1461245. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
7
Toward a multidimensional model of athletes' commitment to coach-athlete relationships and interdependent sport teams: a substantive-methodological synergy.迈向运动员对教练 - 运动员关系及相互依存运动队承诺的多维模型:一种实质性 - 方法论的协同作用。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014 Feb;36(1):52-68. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0038.
8
Extending validity evidence for multidimensional measures of coaching competency.扩展教练能力多维测量的效度证据。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006 Dec;77(4):451-63. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2006.10599380.
9
Coach autonomy support, basic need satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation of paralympic athletes.残奥会运动员的教练自主性支持、基本需求满足和内在动机。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Dec;82(4):722-30. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599809.
10
The Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport (CBS-S): A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version.《运动教练行为量表(CBS-S):瑞典语版本的心理测量学评估》
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Jan;26(1):116-23. doi: 10.1111/sms.12359. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Conceptual Framework for Examining Sport Teams to Understand Group Dynamics in Professional Soccer.运用考察运动团队的概念框架理解职业足球中的团队动态。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 27;19(23):15782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315782.
2
Analysis of the Relationship between Satisfaction with the Coach and the Effect of Comparative Social Feedback in Elite Female Handball Players.分析精英女性手球运动员对教练的满意度与比较性社会反馈效果之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137680.
3
Coaching Servant Leadership: Scale Development and Validation.
指导型仆人式领导:量表的开发与验证
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 18;4:871495. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.871495. eCollection 2022.
4
The Impact of an Authentic Sports Leadership Program for Coach.一个针对教练的真实体育领导力项目的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 21;12:701134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701134. eCollection 2021.
5
Coaching Competency and (Exploratory) Structural Equation Modeling: A Substantive-Methodological Synergy.教练能力与(探索性)结构方程建模:一种实质性与方法论的协同作用。
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013 Sep;14(5):709-718. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.04.008.