Xiao Jianxin, Tian Jia, Peng Yingqi, Hu Rui, Peng Quanhui, Wang Lizhi, Xue Bai, Wang Zhisheng
Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jan;108(1):430-447. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24917. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
The literature on whether or not to feed forage is marked by inconsistencies, largely due to various factors associated with forage inclusion in calf diets. To elucidate these factors, we conducted a 3-level meta-analysis to comprehensively investigate the overall effects of forage provision in young calves. We searched for studies published between 2000 and 2023 in Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and X-Mol. Moderator analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of different forage sources, forage provision methods, starter forms, milk levels, and forage levels on the heterogeneity of growth performance, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility outcomes in studies feeding forage to calves. A mixed-effect model was used to predict the relationship between forage level and performance. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to determine publication bias. A total of 86 treatment comparisons from 36 articles were included in the final dataset. The weighted mean difference was used to evaluate the effect size, and the statistical heterogeneity of the effect size was estimated using Cochrane's Q test. The results showed that forage supplementation improved growth performance, structural growth, and development of rumen fermentation in calves. However, moderator analyses revealed that several factors, including forage source, feeding method, physical form of starter, milk feeding level, and forage feeding level might contribute considerably to variability, resulting in significant heterogeneity in the effects of forage provision in calves. Larger effect sizes were found for oat hay (OH) supplementation rather than alfalfa hay (AH) or straw, and for feeding forage as a free choice (FC) compared with a TMR (defined as a mixture of calf starter and forage), especially when forage was fed as a FC resulting in higher total DMI and body barrel. Forage supplementation was more effective in boosting calf growth in calves provided with ground starter than in calves fed pelleted and textured starter. Greater effects were shown for AH supplementation than OH or straw in improving rumen fermentation parameters. Furthermore, compared with the preweaning period, the effect of providing forage on calves was more noticeable in the postweaning period. The results of the mixed-effects model analysis indicated that calves can be efficiently fed 12% of DM as forage during the preweaning period to support their growth and development. Meanwhile, 9% of DM might be the optimal level for feeding OH and straw to preweaning calves. More studies are essential to explore how different levels of AH dietary supplementation affects calves during the preweaning period and improve the consistency and accuracy of the dose-response curve predictions. Overall, growth performance and rumen fermentation of dairy calves were affected by forage inclusion. Moreover, forage source, feeding method, physical form of starter, milk feeding level, and forage level are essential factors that result in different degrees of effect on the calf's performance and rumen fermentation.
关于是否给犊牛饲喂草料的文献存在不一致之处,这主要是由于与犊牛日粮中草料添加相关的各种因素。为了阐明这些因素,我们进行了一项三级荟萃分析,以全面研究给幼龄犊牛提供草料的总体效果。我们在谷歌学术、ScienceDirect和X-Mol上搜索了2000年至2023年发表的研究。进行了调节因素分析,以评估不同草料来源、草料供应方法、开食料形式、牛奶水平和草料水平对给犊牛饲喂草料的研究中生长性能、瘤胃发酵和养分消化率结果异质性的影响。使用混合效应模型预测草料水平与性能之间的关系。使用漏斗图和Egger检验来确定发表偏倚。最终数据集中包括来自36篇文章的86个处理比较。加权平均差用于评估效应大小,效应大小的统计异质性使用Cochrane's Q检验进行估计。结果表明,补充草料可改善犊牛的生长性能、身体结构生长以及瘤胃发酵的发育。然而,调节因素分析表明,包括草料来源、饲喂方法、开食料的物理形式、牛奶饲喂水平和草料饲喂水平在内的几个因素可能对变异性有很大贡献,导致给犊牛提供草料的效果存在显著异质性。发现补充燕麦干草(OH)而不是苜蓿干草(AH)或秸秆的效应大小更大,并且与全混合日粮(定义为犊牛开食料和草料的混合物)相比,自由选择(FC)饲喂草料时效应更大,特别是当以FC方式饲喂草料时,总干物质采食量(DMI)和体躯更大。与饲喂颗粒状和膨化开食料的犊牛相比,给犊牛补充磨碎的开食料时,补充草料对促进犊牛生长更有效。在改善瘤胃发酵参数方面,补充AH比补充OH或秸秆的效果更显著。此外,与断奶前时期相比,给犊牛提供草料在断奶后时期的效果更明显。混合效应模型分析结果表明,在断奶前时期,犊牛可以有效地饲喂占干物质12%的草料以支持其生长发育。同时,9%的干物质可能是给断奶前犊牛饲喂OH和秸秆的最佳水平。需要更多研究来探索不同水平的AH日粮补充在断奶前时期对犊牛的影响,并提高剂量反应曲线预测的一致性和准确性。总体而言,奶牛犊牛的生长性能和瘤胃发酵受到草料添加的影响。此外,草料来源(饲草种类)、饲喂方法、开食料的物理形式、牛奶饲喂水平和草料水平是对犊牛性能和瘤胃发酵产生不同程度影响的重要因素。