Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, 02115, MA, USA; Department of Environment and Energy and Soil Environment Research Center, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin, Jeonju, Jeollabukdo, 54896, Republic of Korea.
Department of Animal Environment, National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS), Wanju, 55365, Republic of Korea.
Chemosphere. 2024 Oct;366:143392. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143392. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Electrochemical oxidation has emerged as an effective and straightforward technology for groundwater remediation. While recent studies have investigated parameters such as current, electrolyte composition, and electrode materials, most have been conducted using small-scale batch or flow reactors, limiting their applicability to real-world conditions. In this study, a pilot-scale sandbox reactor was employed to simulate realistic groundwater conditions and assess the removal of sulfanilamide, a model organic contaminant. Various electrode configurations were systematically evaluated to identify the key operational parameters influencing pollutant removal efficiency, providing insights for practical applications in groundwater treatment. This study proposes three configurations, including a single well with the anode and cathode, a double well with the separated anode and cathode, and an e-barrier with electrodes separately mounted inside a permeable barrier. Single well had the lowest removal efficiency (60%) because cathodic reaction inhibited the anodic oxidation. A double well with a separate anode and cathode can achieve 80% removal efficiency. However, effluent pH can reach up to 13.2, which can adversely impact groundwater. Meanwhile, the e-barrier not only achieved complete removal, but also maintained a neutral pH of 7.0 over 30 days. The e-barriers proved to be the most effective configuration based on their removal efficiency (100%) while yielding an effluent with neutral pH. The energy consumption of the e-barrier was most effective at 1.54 kWh/m, while the other configurations were 5.40 and 22.18 kWh/m. E-barriers are deemed a very reasonable configuration, both in terms of removal efficiency and practical application in groundwater.
电化学氧化已成为一种有效且直接的地下水修复技术。虽然最近的研究已经调查了电流、电解质组成和电极材料等参数,但大多数研究都是在小规模批量或流动反应器中进行的,这限制了它们在实际条件下的适用性。在这项研究中,采用了中试规模的沙箱反应器来模拟真实的地下水条件,并评估了磺胺类药物(一种模型有机污染物)的去除效果。系统地评估了各种电极配置,以确定影响污染物去除效率的关键操作参数,为地下水处理中的实际应用提供了见解。本研究提出了三种配置,包括带阳极和阴极的单井、带分离阳极和阴极的双井以及带分别安装在可渗透屏障内的电极的 e 屏障。单井的去除效率最低(60%),因为阴极反应抑制了阳极氧化。带分离阳极和阴极的双井可以达到 80%的去除效率。然而,出水 pH 值可达 13.2,这可能对地下水产生不利影响。同时,e 屏障不仅实现了完全去除,而且在 30 天内保持了中性 pH 值 7.0。基于其去除效率(100%)和中性 pH 值的出水,e 屏障被证明是最有效的配置。e 屏障的能量消耗在 1.54 kWh/m 时最有效,而其他配置分别为 5.40 和 22.18 kWh/m。从去除效率和地下水实际应用的角度来看,e 屏障被认为是一种非常合理的配置。