Suppr超能文献

经鼻中隔-经鼻联合及双侧经鼻入路内镜鼻内蝶窦垂体手术的鼻窦并发症

Sinonasal Complications of Combined Transseptal-Transnasal and Bilateral Transnasal Approaches for Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery.

作者信息

Lee Jae Yoon, Park Jae Sung, Jeun Sin Soo, Kim Sung Won, Jang David, Kim Do Hyun, Kim Soo Whan

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e410-e415. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.109. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic combined transseptal-transnasal technique for pituitary adenoma excision is notable for enhanced postoperative functional outcomes. Our study compared the incidence of anterior nasal septal perforation and the resulting sinonasal complications between this method and the bilateral transnasal approach.

METHODS

Using a retrospective cohort from a pre-eminent tertiary referral center, we analyzed 141 cases of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery performed between March 2018 and May 2023. Outcomes for the transseptal-transnasal group (n = 71) and the conventional bilateral transnasal group (n = 70) were compared. Nasal endoscopy and computed tomography were used to assess anterior nasal septal perforation. Functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively using the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test, Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22, and nasal obstruction symptom evaluation.

RESULTS

The transseptal-transnasal approach exhibited reduced rates of postoperative ear fullness (P < 0.001), along with fewer subjective complaints of smell/taste loss (P = 0.022) and thick nasal discharge (P = 0.008), compared to the conventional approach. However, objective smell test results were not significantly different between the 2 approaches (P = 0.243 and P = 0.454 for Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center and Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test, respectively). Additionally, although statistically insignificant, a higher incidence of anterior septal perforation was observed with the transseptal-transnasal approach (P = 0.067).

CONCLUSIONS

For the surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas, the transseptal-transnasal approach offers several advantages over the bilateral transnasal method, particularly in reducing postoperative complications. However, this technique requires careful attention for preventing the occurrence of anterior septal perforation.

摘要

背景

内镜联合经鼻中隔 - 经鼻技术切除垂体腺瘤以术后功能预后改善而著称。我们的研究比较了该方法与双侧经鼻入路在前鼻中隔穿孔发生率及由此导致的鼻鼻窦并发症方面的差异。

方法

利用一家著名的三级转诊中心的回顾性队列研究,我们分析了2018年3月至2023年5月期间进行的141例内镜鼻内蝶窦手术病例。比较了经鼻中隔 - 经鼻组(n = 71)和传统双侧经鼻组(n = 70)的结果。采用鼻内镜检查和计算机断层扫描评估前鼻中隔穿孔情况。术前及术后6个月使用康涅狄格化学感觉临床研究中心测试、跨文化嗅觉识别测试、鼻鼻窦结局测试 - 22和鼻阻塞症状评估来评估功能预后。

结果

与传统入路相比,经鼻中隔 - 经鼻入路术后耳部胀满发生率降低(P < 0.001),嗅觉/味觉丧失的主观主诉(P = 0.022)和浓稠鼻涕(P = 0.008)也较少。然而,两种入路的客观嗅觉测试结果无显著差异(康涅狄格化学感觉临床研究中心测试和跨文化嗅觉识别测试的P值分别为0.243和0.454)。此外,尽管无统计学意义,但经鼻中隔 - 经鼻入路观察到前鼻中隔穿孔的发生率较高(P = 0.067)。

结论

对于垂体腺瘤的手术治疗,经鼻中隔 - 经鼻入路比双侧经鼻方法具有若干优势,尤其是在减少术后并发症方面。然而,该技术需要谨慎注意预防前鼻中隔穿孔的发生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验