• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建设质量改进的能力和能力:新兴区域卫生系统的见解。

Building capacity and capability for quality improvement: insights from a nascent regional health system.

机构信息

Quality, Innovation and Improvement Department, National University Health System, Singapore

Quality, Innovation and Improvement Department, National University Health System, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Sep 28;13(3):e002903. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002903.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002903
PMID:39343448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440186/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Quality improvement (QI) is critical in facilitating advancements in patient outcomes, system efficiency and professional growth. This paper aimed to elucidate the underlying rationale and framework guiding JurongHealth Campus (JHC), a nascent Regional Health System, in developing its QI capacity and capability at all levels of the organisation.

METHODS

An exhaustive analysis of high-performance management systems and effective improvement frameworks was conducted, and the principles were customised to suit the local context.A three-phased approach was applied: (1) developing the JHC QI framework; (2) building capacity through a dosing approach and (3) building capability through QI projects and initiatives using the model for improvement (MFI). Three components of the RE-AIM implementation strategy were assessed: (1) Reach-overall percentage of staff trained; (2) Effectiveness-outcomes from organisation-wide improvement projects and (3) Adoption-number of QI projects collated and presented.

RESULTS

The percentage of staff trained in QI increased from 11.3% to 22.0% between January 2020 and March 2024, with over 350 projects documented in the central repository. The effectiveness of the MFI was demonstrated by improving inpatient discharges before 12pm performance from 21.52% to 25.84% and reducing the 30-day inpatient readmission rate from 13.92% to 12.96%.

CONCLUSION

Four critical factors for an effective QI framework were identified: (1) establishing a common language for improvement; (2) defining distinct roles and skills for improvement at different levels of the organisation; (3) adopting a dosing approach to QI training according to the defined roles and skills and (4) building a critical mass of committed staff trained in QI practice. The pragmatic approach to developing QI capability is both scalable and applicable to emerging healthcare institutions.

摘要

目的

质量改进(QI)对于促进患者结局、系统效率和专业成长的进步至关重要。本文旨在阐明 JurongHealth 园区(JHC),一个新兴的区域医疗系统,在组织各级发展其 QI 能力的基本原理和框架。

方法

对高性能管理系统和有效的改进框架进行了详尽的分析,并根据当地情况对原则进行了定制。采用了三阶段方法:(1)制定 JHC 的 QI 框架;(2)通过剂量方法建立能力;(3)使用改进模型(MFI)通过 QI 项目和举措建立能力。评估了 RE-AIM 实施策略的三个组成部分:(1)覆盖范围-接受培训的员工总数百分比;(2)效果-组织内全面改进项目的结果;(3)采用-整理和提出的 QI 项目数量。

结果

2020 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月,接受 QI 培训的员工比例从 11.3%增加到 22.0%,中央存储库中记录了 350 多个项目。MFI 的有效性通过将 12 点前的住院患者出院率从 21.52%提高到 25.84%和将 30 天内的住院患者再入院率从 13.92%降低到 12.96%来证明。

结论

确定了有效 QI 框架的四个关键因素:(1)为改进建立共同语言;(2)为组织各级别的改进定义明确的角色和技能;(3)根据定义的角色和技能采用剂量方法进行 QI 培训;(4)培养大量接受过 QI 实践培训的敬业员工。开发 QI 能力的实用方法既具有可扩展性,又适用于新兴医疗机构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0006/11440186/998d733a62e5/bmjoq-13-3-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0006/11440186/52c8ce0a9fc4/bmjoq-13-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0006/11440186/278ca6abc988/bmjoq-13-3-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0006/11440186/998d733a62e5/bmjoq-13-3-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0006/11440186/52c8ce0a9fc4/bmjoq-13-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0006/11440186/278ca6abc988/bmjoq-13-3-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0006/11440186/998d733a62e5/bmjoq-13-3-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Building capacity and capability for quality improvement: insights from a nascent regional health system.建设质量改进的能力和能力:新兴区域卫生系统的见解。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Sep 28;13(3):e002903. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002903.
2
Evidence-Based Quality Improvement Training Programs: Building Staff Capability and Organizational Capacity.循证质量改进培训项目:培养员工能力与组织能力
J Nurs Care Qual. 2020 Apr/Jun;35(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000416.
3
Refining a capability development framework for building successful consumer and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: A coproduced eDelphi study.优化能力发展框架,以在医疗保健质量改进中建立成功的消费者和员工伙伴关系:一项共同制作的 e Delphi 研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1563-1579. doi: 10.1111/hex.13499. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Building Systemwide Improvement Capability: Does an Organization's Strategy for Quality Improvement Matter?建立全系统改进能力:组织的质量改进战略重要吗?
Qual Manag Health Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;25(2):92-101. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000089.
5
Decision-maker roles in healthcare quality improvement projects: a scoping review.决策者在医疗质量改进项目中的角色:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 4;13(1):e002522. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002522.
6
A comprehensive model to build improvement capability in a pediatric academic medical center.在儿科学术医疗中心建立改进能力的综合模型。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Jan-Feb;14(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
7
Enhancing emergency medicine initiatives with a quality improvement program: lessons learned in the emergency department of Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa Ethiopia.通过质量改进计划加强急诊医学举措:埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提库尔·安贝萨医院急诊科的经验教训
Ethiop Med J. 2014 Jul;Suppl 2:37-44.
8
Establishing a portfolio of quality-improvement projects in pediatric surgery through advanced improvement leadership systems.通过先进的改进领导系统在小儿外科建立质量改进项目组合。
Perm J. 2013 Fall;17(4):41-6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-035.
9
Model for Doctor of Nursing Practice Projects Based on Cross-Fertilization Between Improvement and Implementation Sciences: Protocol for Quality Improvement and Program Evaluation Studies.基于改进科学与实施科学交叉融合的护理实践博士项目模型:质量改进与项目评估研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jan 31;13:e54213. doi: 10.2196/54213.
10
How to sustainably build capacity in quality improvement within a healthcare organisation: a deep-dive, focused qualitative analysis.如何在医疗机构内可持续地建立质量改进能力:深入、聚焦的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 18;21(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06598-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a Real-Time Risk Score on 30-day Readmission Reduction in Singapore.新加坡实时风险评分对 30 天再入院率降低的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):372-382. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726422. Epub 2021 May 19.
2
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.RE-AIM规划与评估框架:历经20年回顾,适应新科学与实践
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.
3
Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention.社会规范转折点的实验证据。
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1116-1119. doi: 10.1126/science.aas8827.
4
The science of quality improvement implementation: developing capacity to make a difference.质量改进实施的科学:培养产生影响的能力。
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S6-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e1709c.
5
What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care?提高医疗保健质量和安全性的最有效策略是什么?
Intern Med J. 2009 Jun;39(6):389-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01798.x.
6
What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare?什么是“质量改进”,它如何改变医疗保健?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Feb;16(1):2-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.022046.
7
Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress.评估持续质量改进对临床实践的影响:加速进展所需的条件。
Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):593-624, 510. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00107.