Age affects the association of red blood cell indices with efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke.

We conducted a post hoc analysis of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke (RICAMIS) to investigate whether red blood cell (RBC) indices are associated with efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), and whether the association is affected by age. In this post hoc analysis, patients with RBC indices at admission were enrolled. RBC indices including RBC count, hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), hemoglobin (HB), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were analyzed. According to the median of these RBC indices, eligible patients were divided into high and low groups, which were further subdivided into RIC and control subgroups. Primary endpoint was excellent functional outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days, which was used to evaluate RIC efficacy. RIC efficacy as well as effect of age on RIC efficacy were analyzed across the high and low groups of different RBC indices, and the interaction effects of RBC indices on RIC efficacy were evaluated. A total of 1640 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In overall patients, no significant interaction effects of RIC intervention by all RBC indices were found, although there was a trend in interaction effect of RIC intervention by MCH (p = 0.116). However, we found an effect of age on the association of MCH with RIC efficacy. In patients over 60 years old, MCH significantly affected RIC efficacy (p = 0.006) and RIC significantly produced a higher proportion of primary outcome in high MCH (72.6% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001) vs. low MCH group (61.2% vs. 62%, P = 0.829), which was not identified in patients under 60 years old. Furthermore, RIC efficacy decreased with increasing age in patients with low MCH with significant interaction effect (p = 0.012), while RIC efficacy increased with increasing age in patients with high MCH although no significant interaction (p = 0.126). No significant interaction effects of RIC intervention by RBC count, HCT, MCV, HB, and MCHC were found regardless of age. This secondary analysis of RICAMIS suggested that RIC exhibited more obvious benefit in AIS patients over 60 years old with high MCH compared with those with low MCH group, but RBC count, HCT, MCV, HB, and MCHC were not associated with the efficacy of RIC treatment regardless of age.