• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估正畸微螺钉植入部位的腭黏膜厚度。

Evaluating palatal mucosal thickness in orthodontic miniscrew sites using cone-beam computed tomography.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 29;24(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04935-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04935-x
PMID:39343869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11439259/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To comprehensively analyze the palatal thickness of soft tissues and determine optimal regions for the placement of palatal orthodontic miniscrews.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images on the coronal plane were obtained from 60 patients (30 female, 30 male; age range 19-45; mean age 32 ± 11), with 3-mm intervals in the regions of the canine (Ca), first premolar (Pr1), second premolar (Pr2), midpoint between the first and second molars (M1-M2), first molar (M1), second molar (M2) and midpalate.

RESULTS

The mucosal thickness measurements between the teeth showed significantly greater thickness in the Ca region at the 3 mm point, in the Pr1 region at the 6 mm point, and in the Pr2 region at the 9 and 12 mm points. At the 9 mm point, the Pr1 region demonstrated greater thickness than the M1-M2 whereas the Pr2 region was thicker than the M1 and M1-M2 regions. At the 12 and 15 mm points, the thickness increased from anterior to posterior: the Pr1 region was thinner than the Pr2, M1, and M2 regions and the Pr2 region was thinner than the M2 region. A schematization was devised for the optimal areas recommended for miniscrews in the palatal region.

CONCLUSION

The mucosal thickness in the palatal region increases from anterior to posterior except the midpalatal region. Based on the results, in terms of soft tissue, the most suitable place for miniscrew placement is 6 mm from the gingival margin of the teeth and in the median portion of the palate. The findings may guide clinicians in choosing the optimal sites for palatal mini-implants.

摘要

目的

全面分析腭部软组织的厚度,并确定腭部正畸微螺钉的最佳植入部位。

方法

从 60 名患者(30 名女性,30 名男性;年龄 19-45 岁;平均年龄 32±11 岁)的冠状位锥形束 CT(CBCT)图像中,以 3mm 的间隔在尖牙(Ca)、第一前磨牙(Pr1)、第二前磨牙(Pr2)、第一磨牙(M1)和第二磨牙(M2)之间中点(M1-M2)、第一磨牙(M1)、第二磨牙(M2)和腭中缝区域进行测量。

结果

牙齿之间的黏膜厚度测量显示,在 Ca 区的 3mm 点、Pr1 区的 6mm 点和 Pr2 区的 9mm 和 12mm 点处黏膜较厚。在 9mm 点,Pr1 区比 M1-M2 厚,而 Pr2 区比 M1 和 M1-M2 厚。在 12mm 和 15mm 点,从前往后厚度逐渐增加:Pr1 区比 Pr2、M1 和 M2 区薄,Pr2 区比 M2 区薄。设计了一个用于推荐腭部微螺钉最佳植入区域的示意图。

结论

除了腭中缝区域外,腭部黏膜厚度从前往后逐渐增加。基于这些结果,从软组织的角度来看,微螺钉植入的最佳位置是距离牙齿牙龈缘 6mm 处和腭部的中间部分。这些发现可以指导临床医生选择腭部微型植入物的最佳部位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/3d299949d76b/12903_2024_4935_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/18259067590c/12903_2024_4935_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/4e1490b783c4/12903_2024_4935_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/98bba1b0ef65/12903_2024_4935_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/b52305e0fd6d/12903_2024_4935_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/bbde937cfb0b/12903_2024_4935_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/44ad62e71baa/12903_2024_4935_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/d7421d433ba1/12903_2024_4935_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/cdab0d5d689a/12903_2024_4935_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/3d299949d76b/12903_2024_4935_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/18259067590c/12903_2024_4935_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/4e1490b783c4/12903_2024_4935_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/98bba1b0ef65/12903_2024_4935_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/b52305e0fd6d/12903_2024_4935_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/bbde937cfb0b/12903_2024_4935_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/44ad62e71baa/12903_2024_4935_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/d7421d433ba1/12903_2024_4935_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/cdab0d5d689a/12903_2024_4935_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/726d/11439259/3d299949d76b/12903_2024_4935_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating palatal mucosal thickness in orthodontic miniscrew sites using cone-beam computed tomography.利用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估正畸微螺钉植入部位的腭黏膜厚度。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 29;24(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04935-x.
2
Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对日本人群的腭黏膜进行测量。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;26(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12053. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
3
Assessment of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini-implants through cone-beam computed tomography.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估腭部正畸微种植体的可用部位。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jul 1;90(4):516-523. doi: 10.2319/070719-457.1.
4
Do the miniscrews of the prefabricated systems for the "appliance first" protocol of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion have lengths that meet the palatal thickness of patients?“ appliance first ” 方案中预置型支抗微螺钉辅助快速腭扩展的微螺钉长度是否符合患者腭部厚度?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Jun;163(6):e152-e161. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.03.012. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
5
Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans.正畸微型种植体在前腭部的理想植入角度和位置是否存在?一项对人体的 CBCT 研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep;156(3):345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.019.
6
Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.常见微型种植体植入部位皮质骨厚度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Apr;139(4):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.057.
7
Evaluation of bone depth, cortical bone, and mucosa thickness of palatal posterior supra-alveolar insertion site for miniscrew placement.评价腭后上牙槽嵴种植体植入部位的骨深度、皮质骨和黏膜厚度。
Prog Orthod. 2022 Jun 6;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00412-9.
8
Determination of soft tissue thickness at orthodontic miniscrew placement sites using ultrasonography for customizing screw selection.使用超声检查确定正畸微螺钉植入部位的软组织厚度以定制螺钉选择。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Oct;150(4):651-658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.026.
9
Palatal bone thickness and associated factors in adult miniscrew placements: A cone-beam computed tomography study.成人微型螺钉植入术中腭骨厚度及相关因素:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 May;31(5):265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Quantitative analysis of maxillary palatal masticatory mucosa thickness and anatomical morphology of palatal vault in Zhejiang province.浙江省上颌腭咀嚼黏膜厚度的定量分析及腭穹窿解剖形态。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Feb 25;51(1):87-94. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2021-0334.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Palatal Masticatory Mucosa Thickness in the Saudi Population of a Teaching Hospital in the Eastern Province: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional CBCT Study.沙特东部省一家教学医院沙特人群腭部咀嚼黏膜厚度的评估:一项回顾性横断面CBCT研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;13(7):283. doi: 10.3390/dj13070283.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini-implants through cone-beam computed tomography.通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估腭部正畸微种植体的可用部位。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jul 1;90(4):516-523. doi: 10.2319/070719-457.1.
2
Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans.正畸微型种植体在前腭部的理想植入角度和位置是否存在?一项对人体的 CBCT 研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep;156(3):345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.019.
3
The T-Zone: Median vs. Paramedian Insertion of Palatal Mini-Implants.
腭部微型种植体的T区:正中与旁正中植入对比
J Clin Orthod. 2016 Sep;50(9):543-551.
4
Determination of soft tissue thickness at orthodontic miniscrew placement sites using ultrasonography for customizing screw selection.使用超声检查确定正畸微螺钉植入部位的软组织厚度以定制螺钉选择。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Oct;150(4):651-658. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.026.
5
Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对日本人群的腭黏膜进行测量。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;26(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12053. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
Palatal bone density in adult subjects: implications for mini-implant placement.成人硬腭骨密度:对微型种植体植入的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):137-44. doi: 10.2319/011909-40.1.
7
Skeletal anchorage, part 1.骨锚固,第1部分。
J Clin Orthod. 2009 May;43(5):303-17.
8
Success rate of second-generation palatal implants.第二代腭部植入物的成功率。
Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):85-90. doi: 10.2319/010708-8.1.
9
Soft tissue thickness for placement of an orthodontic miniscrew using an ultrasonic device.使用超声设备放置正畸微螺钉时的软组织厚度
Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):403-8. doi: 10.2319/051607-237.1.
10
Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography.腭后咀嚼黏膜厚度:计算机断层扫描的应用
J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):406-12. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070302.