Strupp B J, Levitsky D A
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1985 Fall;9(3):399-411. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(85)90018-1.
This review critically evaluates the animal and human research concerning vasopressin's putative mnemonic role. Weaknesses in the interpretations of the early animal experiments as well as the implications of the later inconsistent findings are discussed. It is concluded that both the initial enthusiasm and the subsequent skepticism concerning this hypothesized role were premature. This conclusion applies equally to the human research. A review of these studies reveals that almost all of the negative reports involved cognitively-impaired individuals. The relatively few studies that have been conducted concerning vasopressin's effects in unimpaired human subjects are consistent with the hypothesis that vasopressin does affect cognition, though both the mechanism of action and the specific cognitive processes which are altered have yet to be elucidated.
本综述批判性地评估了关于血管加压素假定的记忆作用的动物和人体研究。讨论了早期动物实验解释中的弱点以及后期不一致研究结果的影响。得出的结论是,对于这一假设作用最初的热情和随后的怀疑都为时过早。这一结论同样适用于人体研究。对这些研究的回顾表明,几乎所有负面报告都涉及认知受损个体。针对血管加压素在未受损人体受试者中作用的相对较少的研究与血管加压素确实影响认知的假设一致,尽管作用机制和具体改变的认知过程尚未阐明。