• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term Outcomes of Traditional Braces versus Invisalign in Orthodontic Treatment.传统牙套与隐适美正畸治疗的长期效果
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2446-S2448. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_265_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Comparative Analysis of Braces and Aligners: Long-Term Orthodontic Outcomes.牙套与隐形矫治器的对比分析：长期正畸效果
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2385-S2387. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_268_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.与美国正畸委员会客观分级系统相比，隐适美和传统正畸治疗的疗效评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):292-8; discussion 298. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.002.
4
Braces versus Invisalign®: gingival parameters and patients' satisfaction during treatment: a cross-sectional study.braces与隐适美®对比：治疗期间的牙龈参数及患者满意度：一项横断面研究
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Jun 24;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0060-4.
5
Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs Invisalign.关于佩戴传统牙套与隐适美正畸患者体验的推特分析。
Angle Orthod. 2017 May;87(3):377-383. doi: 10.2319/062816-508.1. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
6
The effectiveness of the Invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the the ABO model grading system: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.使用ABO模型分级系统评估隐适美矫治器在拔牙病例中的有效性：一项多中心随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):8276-82. eCollection 2015.
7
What percentage of patients switch from Invisalign to braces? A retrospective study evaluating the conversion rate, number of refinement scans, and length of treatment.有多少患者从隐适美（Invisalign）转用到传统牙套（braces）？一项回顾性研究评估转化率、精细调整扫描次数和治疗时长。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Apr;163(4):526-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.03.016. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
8
Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.隐适美和传统固定矫治器的最终病例质量差异。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):173-179. doi: 10.2319/032921-246.1.
9
Effectiveness of Invisalign Treatment on Open Bite Correction.隐适美矫治器治疗开颌畸形的疗效
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S850-S852. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1058_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
10
The Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Interest in Orthodontic Treatment and Perspectives for the Future. Real-Time Surveillance Using Google Trends.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对正畸治疗兴趣的影响及未来展望。利用谷歌趋势进行实时监测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115647.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral health-related quality of life among adults undergoing orthodontic procedure with ceramic braces versus aligners.接受陶瓷牙套与隐形矫治器正畸治疗的成年人的口腔健康相关生活质量
Bioinformation. 2025 May 31;21(5):1128-1134. doi: 10.6026/973206300211128. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.隐适美和传统固定矫治器的最终病例质量差异。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):173-179. doi: 10.2319/032921-246.1.
2
Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions.青少年轻度过矫正患者采用正畸透明矫正器与固定矫正器治疗的效果评估。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jul 1;90(4):485-490. doi: 10.2319/122919-844.1.
3
Efficiency, effectiveness and treatment stability of clear aligners: A systematic review and meta-analysis.透明矫治器的效率、有效性及治疗稳定性：一项系统评价与Meta分析
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Aug;20(3):127-133. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12177. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: A systematic review.正畸用途数字模型的诊断准确性和测量敏感性：一项系统评价。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.029.
5
2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends.2008年《临床肿瘤学杂志》正畸诊断与治疗程序研究，第1部分：结果与趋势
J Clin Orthod. 2008 Nov;42(11):625-40.
6
Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the invisalign appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions.使用隐适美矫治器对中度至复杂错牙合畸形进行美学正畸治疗。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Aug;72(8):948-67.
7
A comparison of treatment impacts between Invisalign aligner and fixed appliance therapy during the first week of treatment.在治疗的第一周内，隐适美矫治器与固定矫治器治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Mar;131(3):302.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.031.
8
Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.与美国正畸委员会客观分级系统相比，隐适美和传统正畸治疗的疗效评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):292-8; discussion 298. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.002.

传统牙套与隐适美正畸治疗的长期效果

Long-term Outcomes of Traditional Braces versus Invisalign in Orthodontic Treatment.

作者信息

Prudhvi Das Reddy Seelam, Chekka Manjunath, Shah Ruchi, Kauser Afreen, Pisarla Manish, Varma Datla Praveen Kumar, Mahajan Akriti

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Private Dental Practitioner, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Professor and HOD, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Tirumala Dental College, Bardipur, Telangana, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2446-S2448. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_265_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_265_24
PMID:39346258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426896/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This research targets to compare the longstanding outcomes of traditional braces versus Invisalign in orthodontic treatment, focusing on dental alignment, occlusal stability, patient satisfaction, and treatment duration.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort research with 200 subjects was piloted. One hundred subjects received traditional braces, while the other 100 received Invisalign. Dental models, cephalometric radiographs, and intraoral photographs were obtained at baseline, post-treatment, and at 1, 2, and 5 years follow-up. Patient satisfaction surveys were administered at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Both traditional braces and Invisalign effectively improved dental alignment and occlusal stability over the 5-year follow-up period. Patient satisfaction scores were consistently higher in the Invisalign group compared to the traditional braces group. However, there were no significant differences in treatment duration between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Invisalign may offer comparable or superior longstanding outcomes compared to traditional braces in orthodontic treatment, with higher patient satisfaction levels. These findings support the use of Invisalign as a viable alternative to traditional braces, particularly for subjects seeking esthetic and convenient orthodontic solutions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较传统牙套与隐适美在正畸治疗中的长期效果，重点关注牙齿排列、咬合稳定性、患者满意度和治疗时长。

方法

开展了一项针对200名受试者的回顾性队列研究。100名受试者接受传统牙套治疗，另外100名接受隐适美治疗。在基线、治疗后以及随访1年、2年和5年时获取牙齿模型、头影测量X光片和口腔内照片。在每次随访时进行患者满意度调查。

结果

在5年的随访期内，传统牙套和隐适美均有效改善了牙齿排列和咬合稳定性。与传统牙套组相比，隐适美组的患者满意度得分始终更高。然而，两组之间的治疗时长没有显著差异。

结论

在正畸治疗中，隐适美可能比传统牙套提供相当或更好的长期效果，患者满意度更高。这些发现支持将隐适美作为传统牙套的可行替代方案，特别是对于寻求美观且便捷正畸解决方案的受试者。