• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficiency of Different Retrieval Techniques in Gutta-Percha Removal in Endodontic Retreatment: An Study.不同根管再治疗技术去除根管内牙胶的效率:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2640-S2642. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_396_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
Evaluation of dentinal crack propagation, amount of gutta percha remaining and time required during removal of gutta percha using two different rotary instruments and hand instruments - An study.两种不同旋转器械和手动器械在去除牙胶过程中牙本质裂纹扩展、牙胶残留量和所需时间的评估-一项研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;25(4):524-530. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1838_21.
3
Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An study.三种不同旋转器械系统用于根管再治疗期间从根管中去除牙胶的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):311-316. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_132_17.
4
Effectiveness of Different Rotary Files Systems in Removal of Gutta-percha during Endodontic Retreatment with or without Solvents: A Comparative Study.不同旋转锉系统在有无溶剂条件下进行根管再治疗时清除牙胶的效果:一项对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):688-691. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3523.
5
Comparative analysis of efficacy and cleaning ability of hand and rotary devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment: an in vitro study.根管再治疗中手用器械和旋转器械去除牙胶效果及清洁能力的比较分析:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Jul 1;14(4):635-43. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1377.
6
Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.不同旋转镍钛器械在根管再治疗中的疗效、清洁能力及安全性
Int Endod J. 2004 Jul;37(7):468-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00823.x.
7
Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals.三种不同旋转锉去除根管内牙胶和 Resilon 的效果比较。
Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):1022-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01758.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
8
An Study of Gutta Percha Removal Commencing from the Root Canal Undergoing Endodontic Retreatment using Different Rotary Instrumentation Systems.一项关于使用不同旋转器械系统从接受根管再治疗的根管中去除牙胶尖的研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S522-S525. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_83_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
9
A comparative evaluation of two rotary Ni-Ti instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during retreatment.两种旋转镍钛器械在根管再治疗时去除牙胶的比较评价
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S131-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.189740.
10
Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment.根管再治疗中不同去除牙胶尖器械的疗效、清洁能力及安全性
Int Endod J. 1997 Jul;30(4):227-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00036.x.

本文引用的文献

1
New Technologies to Improve Root Canal Disinfection.改善根管消毒的新技术。
Braz Dent J. 2016 Jan-Feb;27(1):3-8. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600726.
2
The efficacy of five techniques for removing root filling material: microscopic versus radiographic evaluation.五种根管充填材料去除技术的疗效评价:显微镜评估与放射学评估。
Int Endod J. 2012 Jan;45(1):35-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01944.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
3
Study on the influence of refreshment/activation cycles and irrigants on mechanical cleaning efficiency during ultrasonic activation of the irrigant.超声荡洗时冲洗/激活循环和冲洗液对机械清洗效率影响的研究。
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):737-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
4
Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures.治疗程序后细菌持续存在的临床意义及微生物学
J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11):1291-1301.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
5
Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment.牙髓病治疗结果:多伦多研究——第3和第4阶段:根管再治疗
J Endod. 2008 Feb;34(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.003. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
6
Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment.不同旋转器械在根管再治疗中去除牙胶的疗效
J Endod. 2006 May;32(5):469-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.052.
7
Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.不同旋转镍钛器械在根管再治疗中的疗效、清洁能力及安全性
Int Endod J. 2004 Jul;37(7):468-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00823.x.
8
Complications during root canal irrigation--literature review and case reports.根管冲洗过程中的并发症——文献综述与病例报告
Int Endod J. 2000 May;33(3):186-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00303.x.
9
An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry.牙科用镍钛合金概述。
Int Endod J. 2000 Jul;33(4):297-310. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00339.x.

不同根管再治疗技术去除根管内牙胶的效率:一项研究。

Efficiency of Different Retrieval Techniques in Gutta-Percha Removal in Endodontic Retreatment: An Study.

作者信息

Neelima U Lavanya, Alghamdi Nuha, Alshahrani Abdulrahman Yahya, Shenoy Panakaje Mangesh, Late Laxmikant, Pius Alen, Gavarraju Deepthi Nirmal

机构信息

Department of Conservative and Endodontics, GSL Dental College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, College of Dentistry, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2640-S2642. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_396_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_396_24
PMID:39346278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11426662/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the effectiveness of various gutta-percha retrieval methods in endodontic retreatment.

METHODS

Five groups were randomly allocated to extract human teeth that had already had root canal therapy: manual files, rotary tools, heat, solvents, and ultrasonics. By evaluating the amount of filling material still present, gutta-percha clearance was quantitatively examined, and root canal cleanliness was qualitatively appraised. To compare the effectiveness of retrieval approaches, statistical analysis was done.

FINDINGS

Hand files, heat, and solvents were less effective than rotary devices and ultrasonics at removing gutta-percha ( < 0.05). A quantitative investigation showed that the groups using rotary instruments (0.87 mm) and ultrasonics (0.68 mm) had much less gutta-percha left. The qualitative evaluation revealed that rotary instruments (2.12) and ultrasonics (2.45) had greater cleaning ratings compared to other methods.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, gutta-percha can be effectively removed during endodontic retreatment by using rotary tools and ultrasonics, which provide both quantitative efficiency and qualitative purity. The implementation of sophisticated retrieval procedures to maximize treatment results in clinical practice is supported by these findings.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估各种根管充填材料取出方法在根管再治疗中的有效性。

方法

将五组随机分配用于拔除已进行根管治疗的人牙,分别采用手动锉、旋转器械、加热、溶剂和超声等方法。通过评估仍存在的充填材料量,对根管充填材料的清除情况进行定量检查,并对根管清洁度进行定性评估。为比较取出方法的有效性,进行了统计分析。

结果

在去除根管充填材料方面,手动锉、加热和溶剂的效果不如旋转器械和超声(P<0.05)。定量研究表明,使用旋转器械(0.87mm)和超声(0.68mm)的组残留的根管充填材料要少得多。定性评估显示,与其他方法相比,旋转器械(2.12)和超声(2.45)的清洁评分更高。

结论

总之,在根管再治疗过程中,使用旋转器械和超声可以有效地去除根管充填材料,它们兼具定量效率和定性纯度。这些研究结果支持在临床实践中采用复杂的取出程序以最大限度地提高治疗效果。