Suman Neelam, Munuganti Niharika, Duseja Sareen, Abdul Hina Naim, Puthenkandathil Rahul, Choithani Kishan K, Kumar Ashok, Patel Vilas, Kommuri Sirisha
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, SGRD Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bardipur, Nizamabad, Telangana, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2549-S2551. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_273_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
In contemporary prosthodontics, implant-supported dental prostheses are frequently utilized to restore function and esthetics for individuals who are edentulous. The prosthetic material selection has a big impact on long-term performance and maintenance needs.
A retrospective review of patient files from the dental implant clinic of a tertiary care facility was done. Included were patients who had dental prosthesis supported by implants between January 2018 and December 2022. Data were gathered and examined on the prosthesis material, follow-up visits, and maintenance interventions (adjustments, repairs, and replacements).
Materials for 50 prostheses made of porcelain, 45 prostheses made of acrylic, 35 prostheses made of metal, and 40 prostheses made of composite were assessed. When it came to modifications and repairs, porcelain prosthesis needed less work than acrylic prostheses. Composite prostheses required the least amount of maintenance overall, whereas metal prostheses indicated a considerable demand for maintenance.
Superior durability is provided by porcelain, frequent repairs are needed for acrylic, structural strength is provided by metal, and composite material gives promising esthetics with low maintenance requirements. These results highlight how crucial it is to take material properties into account when choosing a prosthesis to maximize long-term results and patient happiness.
在当代口腔修复学中，种植体支持的牙修复体经常被用于为无牙患者恢复功能和美观。修复材料的选择对长期性能和维护需求有很大影响。
对一家三级医疗机构的种植牙诊所的患者档案进行回顾性研究。纳入2018年1月至2022年12月期间接受种植体支持牙修复体的患者。收集并检查有关修复体材料、随访以及维护干预（调整、修复和更换）的数据。
评估了50个瓷修复体、45个丙烯酸树脂修复体、35个金属修复体和40个复合树脂修复体的材料。在修改和修复方面，瓷修复体比丙烯酸树脂修复体需要的工作量少。复合树脂修复体总体上需要的维护最少，而金属修复体显示出对维护的大量需求。
瓷提供卓越的耐久性，丙烯酸树脂需要频繁修复，金属提供结构强度，复合材料具有美观且维护要求低的前景。这些结果凸显了在选择修复体时考虑材料特性对于最大化长期效果和患者满意度的重要性。
