即刻功能负载中带瓣与无瓣种植体植入的比较研究
Flap Versus Flapless Implant Placement in Immediate Functional Loading: A Comparative Study.
作者信息
Javiya Piyush, Anjan T, Duseja Shilpa, Matada Basavarajaiah Jeevan, Tate Jignesh, Puthenkandathil Rahul, Baig Fawaz Abdul Hamid
机构信息
Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Piparia, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Department of Prosthodontics, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, India.
出版信息
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2643-S2645. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_395_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
BACKGROUND
Dental implants are now the typical tooth replacement method. Because it speeds up therapy, quick functional loading-attaching prosthetic restorations to implants following surgery-has become popular. Flapless implant implantation reduces surgical stress and expedites recovery.
METHODS
A prospective comparative study of 100 flap and flapless dental implant patients was done. Patient-reported outcomes, implant survival, peri-implant parameters, and surgical complications were assessed. Statistical analysis compared the two groups' results.
RESULTS
Both flap and flapless methods exhibited good implant survival and similar peri-implant characteristics. Patients reported equal postoperative comfort and satisfaction in both groups. Surgical complications were similar for flap and flapless surgeries.
CONCLUSION
In immediate functional loading, flap and flapless implant insertion are equally effective and safe. Both methods yield dependable implant survival, peri-implant health, patient comfort, and surgical safety. Dental professionals should evaluate patient variables and anatomical aspects while choosing an implant implantation surgery. Implant dentistry needs further study on long-term results and treatment regimens.
背景
牙种植体现已成为典型的牙齿替代方法。由于它能加快治疗速度，快速功能加载——即在手术后将修复性假体附着于种植体——已变得流行起来。不翻瓣种植体植入术可减轻手术应激并加速恢复。
方法
对100例接受翻瓣和不翻瓣牙种植体植入术的患者进行了一项前瞻性对照研究。评估了患者报告的结果、种植体存活率、种植体周围参数和手术并发症。统计分析比较了两组的结果。
结果
翻瓣和不翻瓣方法均显示出良好的种植体存活率和相似的种植体周围特征。两组患者术后舒适度和满意度相当。翻瓣和不翻瓣手术的手术并发症相似。
结论
在即刻功能加载中，翻瓣和不翻瓣种植体植入同样有效且安全。两种方法都能实现可靠的种植体存活、种植体周围健康、患者舒适度和手术安全性。牙科专业人员在选择种植体植入手术时应评估患者变量和解剖学因素。种植牙科学需要对长期结果和治疗方案进行进一步研究。
Zotero 插件