牙周炎的激光手术与非激光手术：一项对比研究。
Laser Surgery versus Non-laser Surgery in Periodontitis: A Comparative Study.
作者信息
Rao Reema M, Roy Shovan, Mondal Arnab, Tate Jignesh, Bharath K, Pendyala Siva Kumar, Pandey Pritee, Tiwari Heena D
机构信息
Department of Periodontics, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte, Deemed to be University, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Jharkhand, India.
出版信息
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2758-S2760. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_394_24. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this research is to estimate the effectiveness of non-laser surgery and laser surgery in the management of periodontitis.
METHODS
One hundred participants with a chronic periodontitis diagnosis participated in a randomized controlled experiment. Two cohorts of patients were created: Cohort B underwent non-laser surgery and Cohort A underwent laser surgery. Pre- and postoperative assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months for clinical criteria such as "pocket depth (PD), gingival index (GI), and clinical attachment level (CAL)".
RESULTS
There was a noticeable improvement in clinical parameters following both laser and non-laser operations. However, laser surgery showed superior results in terms of decreased PD and raised CAL.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, compared to non-laser surgery, laser surgery seems to be a more successful treatment option for periodontitis. Larger sample sizes and longstanding follow-up are required for future research in order to validate these results and evaluate the longstanding sustainability of the treatment effects.
目的
本研究旨在评估非激光手术和激光手术治疗牙周炎的效果。
方法
100名被诊断为慢性牙周炎的参与者参加了一项随机对照实验。创建了两组患者：B组接受非激光手术，A组接受激光手术。在3个月、6个月和12个月时对临床标准进行术前和术后评估，如“牙周袋深度（PD）、牙龈指数（GI）和临床附着水平（CAL）”。
结果
激光手术和非激光手术后临床参数均有显著改善。然而，激光手术在降低PD和提高CAL方面显示出更好的效果。
结论
总之，与非激光手术相比，激光手术似乎是治疗牙周炎更成功的选择。未来的研究需要更大的样本量和长期随访，以验证这些结果并评估治疗效果的长期可持续性。
Zotero 插件