Dunlap Allyson, McBride Morgan, Tuominen Alison, Roby Brianne, Redmann Andrew, Meyer Abby, Herd Hannah, Meyer Cassandra, Chinnadurai Sivakumar, Finch Michael, Jayawardena Asitha D L
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery, Children's Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Sep 28;9(5):e70001. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70001. eCollection 2024 Oct.
The objective of this study is to investigate whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss in children ages 3-18 using a diotic and antiphasic digits-in-noise (DIN) tablet-based test using existing adult cut-off criteria.
A blinded multi-institutional prospective cohort of 64 children aged 3-18 scheduled for an audiometric soundbooth evaluation with a pediatric audiologist and a same-day otolaryngologist examination were recruited for the study. Following a conventional audiogram, the subjects underwent diotic (same-phased stimuli) and antiphasic (out-of-phase stimuli) DIN testing on a HearX Samsung Galaxy tablet with over-the-ear headphones, for a total of 128 measurements. DIN test results were compared with soundbooth audiometry using known adult "cut off criteria."
A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics (age, sex) and race was performed to compare CHL determination from DIN testing to CHL determination with soundbooth audiometry. The results showed 50% agreement with a -value of .753. The determinations based on combined DIN testing agreed with each other 33% of the time and had a -value of .373. Otologic pathology and age were not predictive of outcome.
This preliminary analysis of DIN testing indicated that DIN and audiometric testing completed in a soundbooth were not significantly predictive of one another in the population of children aged 3-18 when using the adult cut-off criteria for CHL differentiation. Given these findings, further testing is required in children to determine pediatric specific cut-off values.
本研究的目的是调查使用基于双耳和反相数字噪声(DIN)平板电脑测试并采用现有的成人临界值标准,能否在3至18岁儿童中将传导性听力损失(CHL)与感音神经性听力损失区分开来。
招募了一个64名3至18岁儿童的多机构前瞻性队列,这些儿童计划由儿科听力学家进行听力计隔音室评估,并在同一天接受耳鼻喉科医生检查。在进行常规听力图检查后,受试者使用头戴式耳机在HearX三星Galaxy平板电脑上接受双耳(同相刺激)和反相(异相刺激)DIN测试,共进行128次测量。将DIN测试结果与使用已知成人“临界值标准”的隔音室听力测定结果进行比较。
进行了一项针对人口统计学(年龄、性别)和种族进行调整的逻辑回归分析,以比较DIN测试确定的CHL与隔音室听力测定确定的CHL。结果显示一致性为50%,P值为0.753。基于联合DIN测试的测定结果在33%的时间内彼此一致,P值为0.373。耳科病理学和年龄不能预测结果。
对DIN测试的这项初步分析表明,在使用成人CHL区分临界值标准时,在3至18岁儿童群体中,DIN测试和在隔音室中完成的听力测定彼此之间没有显著的预测性。鉴于这些发现,需要在儿童中进行进一步测试以确定儿科特定的临界值。