• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A hospital lipid-lowering protocol improves 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.一项医院降脂方案改善了急性冠状动脉综合征患者的2年临床结局。
AsiaIntervention. 2024 Sep 27;10(3):169-176. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00056. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Effectiveness of hospital lipid-lowering protocol of intensive lipid-lowering therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome.强化降脂治疗方案对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的降脂效果。
J Cardiol. 2022 Mar;79(3):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
3
Effect of intensive statin therapy on clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. PCI-PROVE IT: A PROVE IT-TIMI 22 (Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22) Substudy.强化他汀类药物治疗对急性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床结局的影响。PCI-PROVE IT:PROVE IT-TIMI 22(普伐他汀或阿托伐他汀评估和感染治疗-心肌梗死 22)亚研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 8;54(24):2290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.010.
4
Lipid-lowering treatment up to one year after acute coronary syndrome: guidance from a French expert panel for the implementation of guidelines in practice.急性冠脉综合征后降脂治疗一年:法国专家组对指南实施的指导意见。
Panminerva Med. 2023 Jun;65(2):244-249. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.22.04777-2. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
In-Hospital Outcomes of Dual Loading Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients 75 Years and Older With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings From the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) Project.75 岁及以上急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗的住院结局:来自 CCC-ACS(改善中国心血管疾病治疗-急性冠状动脉综合征)项目的研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 30;7(7):e008100. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008100.
6
Association of hyperlipidaemia with 5-year survival after hospitalisation for acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score matched analysis.高脂血症与急性心肌梗死后住院5年生存率的关联:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 17;7(1):e001163. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001163. eCollection 2020.
7
[Age-related differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome under the chest pain center model: a multicenter retrospective study].胸痛中心模式下急性冠状动脉综合征管理与结局的年龄相关差异:一项多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):318-323. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200806-00565.
8
Benefits of intensive lipid-lowering therapies in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性冠脉综合征患者强化降脂治疗的获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2389470. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2389470. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
Comparison of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.比较多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术在伴有非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的严重冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用。
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(10):1474-1481. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2018.0151. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
Associations Between Chronic Kidney Disease and Outcomes With Use of Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the PROMETHEUS Study.慢性肾脏病与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗结局的相关性:来自 PROMETHEUS 研究的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2017-2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.047. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (RACING): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.瑞西伐他汀与依折麦布联合中等强度他汀治疗与高强度他汀单药治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的长期疗效和安全性(RACING):一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 30;400(10349):380-390. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00916-3. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Effect of Alirocumab Added to High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The PACMAN-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.依洛尤单抗联合高强度他汀治疗对急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉粥样硬化的影响:PACMAN-AMI 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 May 10;327(18):1771-1781. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5218.
3
Effectiveness of hospital lipid-lowering protocol of intensive lipid-lowering therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome.强化降脂治疗方案对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的降脂效果。
J Cardiol. 2022 Mar;79(3):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
4
Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction.多支血管 PCI 血运重建:以血流储备分数(FFR)或血管造影为指导治疗心肌梗死。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 22;385(4):297-308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104650. Epub 2021 May 16.
5
Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study.经冠状动脉近红外光谱和超声(PROSPECT II)识别易损斑块和患者:一项前瞻性自然史研究。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):985-995. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00249-X.
6
Lipid Management and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes in Japanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: EXPLORE-J.急性冠状动脉综合征日本患者的血脂管理和 2 年临床结局:EXPLORE-J。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 Dec 1;28(12):1307-1322. doi: 10.5551/jat.59543. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
7
Cumulative Adherence to Secondary Prevention Guidelines and Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后,二级预防指南的累积依从性与死亡率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 17;9(6):e014415. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014415. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
8
JCS 2018 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome.《日本循环学会2018年急性冠状动脉综合征诊断与治疗指南》
Circ J. 2019 Apr 25;83(5):1085-1196. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0133. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
9
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia.依泽替米贝降低严重高甘油三酯血症患者心血管风险
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 3;380(1):11-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812792. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
10
Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗临床试验的标准化终点定义:学术研究联合会-2 共识文件。
Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289.

一项医院降脂方案改善了急性冠状动脉综合征患者的2年临床结局。

A hospital lipid-lowering protocol improves 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

作者信息

Nakao Sho, Ishihara Takayuki, Tsujimura Takuya, Iida Osamu, Hata Yosuke, Toyoshima Taku, Higashino Naoko, Kusuda Masaya, Mano Toshiaki

机构信息

Kansai Rosai Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Amagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

AsiaIntervention. 2024 Sep 27;10(3):169-176. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00056. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00056
PMID:39347115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11413639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although mortality after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has improved in the acute phase, cardiovascular events occur at a certain frequency in the chronic phase. A hospital lipid-lowering protocol (HLP) could be effective in providing optimal lipid-lowering therapy to improve long-term clinical outcomes after ACS.

AIMS

This study investigated the impact of HLP on clinical outcomes in patients with ACS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 1,114 ACS patients who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention between November 2011 and June 2021. In December 2018, we introduced a HLP that included the prescription of the maximum tolerated dose of statin, ezetimibe, and eicosapentaenoic acid after ACS treatment. We compared 2-year clinical outcomes before (control group: 791 patients) and after the HLP's introduction (HLP group: 323 patients). The primary outcome was the non-target vessel revascularisation (non-TVR) rate. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and inverse probability weighting (IPW) based on the propensity score were used to evaluate the effect of HLP on the outcomes.

RESULTS

The cumulative 2-year non-TVR incidence was significantly lower in the HLP group than in the control group (8.5% vs 13.8%; p=0.019). Multivariable analysis revealed non-TVR risk was significantly lower in the HLP group than in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.637 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.416-0.975]; p=0.038). The IPW analysis confirmed a significant association between the HLP and a lower non-TVR risk (aHR: 0.544 [95% CI: 0.350-0.847]; p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing HLP for ACS patients improved the 2-year clinical outcome.

摘要

背景

尽管急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)急性期后的死亡率有所改善,但心血管事件在慢性期仍以一定频率发生。医院降脂方案(HLP)可能有助于提供最佳降脂治疗,以改善ACS后的长期临床结局。

目的

本研究调查HLP对ACS患者临床结局的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2011年11月至2021年6月期间成功接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的1114例ACS患者。2018年12月,我们引入了一项HLP,其中包括在ACS治疗后开具他汀类药物、依折麦布和二十碳五烯酸的最大耐受剂量处方。我们比较了HLP引入前(对照组:791例患者)和引入后(HLP组:323例患者)的2年临床结局。主要结局是非靶血管血运重建(non-TVR)率。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型和基于倾向评分的逆概率加权(IPW)来评估HLP对结局的影响。

结果

HLP组2年累计non-TVR发生率显著低于对照组(8.5%对13.8%;p=0.019)。多变量分析显示,HLP组的non-TVR风险显著低于对照组(调整后风险比[aHR]:0.637[95%置信区间[CI]:0.416-0.975];p=0.038)。IPW分析证实HLP与较低的non-TVR风险之间存在显著关联(aHR:0.544[95%CI:0.350-0.847];p=0.007)。

结论

对ACS患者实施HLP可改善2年临床结局。