Suppr超能文献

**译文**:学生智齿拔除培训:分步式还是一体式?

Wisdom Tooth Extraction Training for Dental Students: Step-by-Step or All-in-One?

机构信息

Department of General Dentistry II, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024 Sep 30;85(9):1-15. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0249. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Abstract

For inexperienced dental students, impacted wisdom tooth extraction is a complex procedure involving a series of intricate steps. This study compared the effectiveness of step-by-step and all-in-one teaching methods for dental students learning impacted wisdom tooth extraction, by evaluating their practical abilities, understanding, and learning satisfaction. Fifty dental students were randomly assigned to either a step-by-step teaching group (Group S) or an all-in-one teaching group (Group A) for impacted wisdom tooth extraction training. Their skills were assessed using the Assessment of Competency in Exodontia Skills (ACES) scoring system, and their theoretical knowledge was tested in a test. The students also completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction regarding the teaching method received. The students in Group S demonstrated superior performance in clinical procedures compared to Group A, evidenced by the significantly higher ACES scores ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference in theoretical exam scores between the two groups ( > 0.05). The students in Group S reported higher general satisfaction ( < 0.05), suggesting a preference for the step-by-step approach. The results also showed that satisfaction toward hands-on practice and teaching sessions significantly contributed to general satisfaction, while satisfaction with mastery of clinical skills did not. The step-by-step teaching method was more effective in improving students' clinical skills and augmenting their satisfaction during impacted wisdom tooth extraction training. Our findings support the use of incremental learning approaches in dental education to enhance both clinical competencies and students' learning experiences.

摘要

对于缺乏经验的牙科学生来说,拔除阻生智齿是一项复杂的操作,涉及一系列复杂的步骤。本研究通过评估学生的实际操作能力、理解能力和学习满意度,比较了分步式和一体式教学方法在教授学生拔除阻生智齿方面的效果。将 50 名牙科学生随机分为分步式教学组(S 组)和一体式教学组(A 组),进行阻生智齿拔除培训。使用拔牙技能评估量表(ACES)对学生的技能进行评估,并通过测试评估他们的理论知识。学生还完成了一份问卷,以评估他们对所接受教学方法的满意度。S 组学生在临床操作方面的表现明显优于 A 组,ACES 评分明显更高(<0.05)。两组学生的理论考试成绩无显著差异(>0.05)。S 组学生的总体满意度更高(<0.05),表明他们更喜欢分步式教学方法。研究结果还表明,对实践操作和教学环节的满意度对总体满意度有显著影响,而对临床技能掌握程度的满意度则没有显著影响。分步式教学方法在提高学生的临床技能和增加他们在阻生智齿拔除培训中的满意度方面更为有效。我们的研究结果支持在牙科教育中采用渐进式学习方法,以提高学生的临床能力和学习体验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验