Department of Animal Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Department of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga, 0727, South Africa.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Sep 30;56(8):306. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04168-8.
The study quantified breed effects and putative non-additive genetic variation for quantitative and qualitative slaughter and skin traits involving three ostrich breeds: South African Black (SAB), Zimbabwean Blue (ZB), and Kenyan Red (KR) ostriches. Such data from contemporary slaughter groups with all three pure breeds represented were analyzed together (SAB: n = 457; ZB: n = 74; KR: n = 50). Two 2 × 2 diallel crossbreeding designs were used to assess crosses of ZB and KR birds with the SAB strain. Subsequently, the data from SAB, ZB and their reciprocal crosses, slaughtered together; as well as the data from SAB and KR ostriches, along with their reciprocal crosses, respectively, were analyzed separately. ZB and KR birds outperformed SAB birds for most size-related slaughter and skin traits. Linear contrasts were used to distinguish the effects of breed, heterosis, and the dam line. For the ZB x SAB design, additive breed effects were significant for slaughter weight (10.4%), crust skin size (3.9%) and nodule shape score (1.6%) (all P < 0.05). Significant heterosis were found for slaughter weight (4.3%), crust skin size (1.7%) and nodule size score (3.7%) (P < 0.05). Dam line effects were observed for skin weight (4.1%) and hair follicle score (4.1%). In the KR x SAB design, additive breed effects were like outcomes for the ZB x SAB design. Heterosis estimates were significant (P < 0.05) for slaughter weight (5.8%), crust skin size (2.9%), crown length (1.7%) and nodule size score (4.4%). Dam line effects were significant for slaughter weight (3.7%) and nodule size score (3.8%). In conclusion, ZB and KR birds outperformed their SAB contemporaries for size and size-related traits. Crossbreeding with these genotypes could improve some size-related traits over the mid-parent value of purebreds.
本研究量化了三个鸵鸟品种(南非黑鸵鸟、津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟和肯尼亚红鸵鸟)的数量和质量屠宰及皮肤性状的品种效应和潜在非加性遗传变异。对所有三个纯品种代表的当代屠宰群体进行了综合分析(南非黑鸵鸟:n=457;津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟:n=74;肯尼亚红鸵鸟:n=50)。使用两个 2×2 完全双列杂交设计来评估津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟和肯尼亚红鸵鸟与南非黑鸵鸟的杂交。随后,对南非黑鸵鸟、津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟及其正反交组合,以及南非黑鸵鸟和肯尼亚红鸵鸟及其正反交组合进行了单独分析。与南非黑鸵鸟相比,津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟和肯尼亚红鸵鸟在大多数与体型相关的屠宰和皮肤性状方面表现更好。线性对比用于区分品种、杂种优势和母系的影响。对于 ZB×SAB 设计,屠宰体重(10.4%)、皮质皮肤大小(3.9%)和结节形状评分(1.6%)的加性品种效应显著(均 P<0.05)。发现屠宰体重(4.3%)、皮质皮肤大小(1.7%)和结节大小评分(3.7%)存在显著杂种优势(P<0.05)。母系效应见于皮肤重量(4.1%)和毛囊评分(4.1%)。在 KR×SAB 设计中,与 ZB×SAB 设计一样,品种的加性效应明显。杂种优势估计值显著(P<0.05),用于屠宰体重(5.8%)、皮质皮肤大小(2.9%)、冠长(1.7%)和结节大小评分(4.4%)。母系效应在屠宰体重(3.7%)和结节大小评分(3.8%)方面显著。总之,津巴布韦蓝鸵鸟和肯尼亚红鸵鸟在体型和体型相关性状方面优于其南非黑鸵鸟的同期。与这些基因型杂交可以提高一些与体型相关的性状,超过纯系的中亲值。