• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打车技术减轻了司机种族歧视的影响,但居住隔离的影响依然存在。

Ride-hailing technology mitigates effects of driver racial discrimination, but effects of residential segregation persist.

机构信息

Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Andlinger Center for Energy Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 8;121(41):e2408936121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2408936121. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2408936121
PMID:39348538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11474100/
Abstract

We assess racial disparities in the service quality of app-based ride-hailing services, like Uber and Lyft, by simulating their operations in the city of Chicago using empirical data. To generate driver cancellation rate disparities consistent with controlled experiments (up to twice as large for Black riders as for White riders), we estimate that more than 3% of drivers discriminate by race. We find that the capabilities of ride-hailing technology to rapidly rematch after a cancellation and prioritize long-waiting customers heavily mitigates the effects of driver discrimination on rider wait times, reducing average discrimination-induced disparities to less than 1 min-an order of magnitude less than traditional taxis. However, our results suggest that even in the absence of direct driver discrimination, Black riders in Chicago wait about 50% longer, on average, than White riders because of historically informed geographic residential patterns. We estimate that if Black riders in the city had the same wait times as White riders, the collective travel time saved would be worth $4.2 million to $7.0 million per year.

摘要

我们通过使用实证数据模拟优步(Uber)和来福车(Lyft)等基于应用程序的叫车服务在芝加哥市的运营情况,评估了这些服务在服务质量方面的种族差异。为了生成与对照实验一致的司机取消率差异(黑人乘客的取消率比白人乘客高两倍),我们估计超过 3%的司机存在种族歧视。我们发现,叫车技术在取消后迅速重新匹配和优先考虑长时间等待的乘客的能力,大大减轻了司机歧视对乘客等待时间的影响,将平均歧视引起的差异减少到不到 1 分钟——这一数字比传统出租车低了一个数量级。然而,我们的结果表明,即使没有直接的司机歧视,由于历史上形成的居住模式,芝加哥的黑人乘客的平均等待时间也比白人乘客长约 50%。我们估计,如果该市的黑人乘客等待时间与白人乘客相同,每年节省的集体旅行时间将价值 420 万至 700 万美元。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/64be136ff63f/pnas.2408936121fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/3a6167e7571f/pnas.2408936121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/3b26ba0afdfc/pnas.2408936121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/de4ce6c510f0/pnas.2408936121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/e904874eb51d/pnas.2408936121fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/64be136ff63f/pnas.2408936121fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/3a6167e7571f/pnas.2408936121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/3b26ba0afdfc/pnas.2408936121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/de4ce6c510f0/pnas.2408936121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/e904874eb51d/pnas.2408936121fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f3d/11474100/64be136ff63f/pnas.2408936121fig05.jpg

相似文献

1
Ride-hailing technology mitigates effects of driver racial discrimination, but effects of residential segregation persist.打车技术减轻了司机种族歧视的影响,但居住隔离的影响依然存在。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 8;121(41):e2408936121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2408936121. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Distractions by work-related activities: The impact of ride-hailing app and radio system on male taxi drivers.工作相关活动的干扰:打车应用程序和广播系统对男性出租车司机的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Dec;178:106849. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106849. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Association Between Changes in Racial Residential and School Segregation and Trends in Racial Health Disparities, 2000-2020: A Life Course Perspective.2000 - 2020年种族居住和学校隔离变化与种族健康差异趋势之间的关联:生命历程视角
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr;12(2):1278-1297. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-01960-y. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Were ride-hailing fares affected by the COVID-19 pandemic? Empirical analyses in Atlanta and Boston.网约车费用受到新冠疫情的影响吗?亚特兰大和波士顿的实证分析。
Transportation (Amst). 2022 Nov 10:1-32. doi: 10.1007/s11116-022-10349-x.
5
Driving safety assessment for ride-hailing drivers.网约车司机的驾驶安全评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105574. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105574. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
6
The Relationship between Racial Residential Segregation and Black-White Disparities in Fatal Police Shootings at the City Level, 2013-2017.2013-2017 年市级层面种族居住隔离与警察枪杀黑-白人群差异的关系
J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Dec;111(6):580-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Association between racial residential segregation and screening uptake for colorectal and cervical cancer among Black and White patients in five US health care systems.五种美国医疗体系中黑人和白人患者的种族居住隔离与结直肠癌和宫颈癌筛查参与率之间的关联。
Cancer. 2024 Dec 15;130(24):4287-4297. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35514. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
8
Racial residential segregation and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: an analysis of Georgia USA county-level data.种族居住隔离与 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:对美国佐治亚州县级数据的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):1392. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16235-0.
9
Associations between perceived racial discrimination, racial residential segregation, and cancer screening adherence among low-income African Americans: a multilevel, cross-sectional analysis.感知到的种族歧视、种族居住隔离与低收入非裔美国人癌症筛查遵从性之间的关联:一项多层次、横断面分析。
Ethn Health. 2023 Apr;28(3):313-334. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2022.2043246. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
Association Between Changes in Racial Residential Segregation and Trends in Racial Disparities in Early Mortality in 220 Metropolitan Areas, 2001-2018.2001-2018 年 220 个大都市区种族居住隔离变化与早期死亡率种族差异趋势之间的关联。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec;11(6):3782-3793. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01830-z. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
QnAs with Jeremy J. Michalek and Corey D. Harper.与杰里米·J·米哈莱克和科里·D·哈珀的问答
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 11;122(6):e2500725122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500725122. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Equitable infrastructure: Achieving resilient systems and restorative justice through policy and research innovation.公平的基础设施:通过政策和研究创新实现有复原力的系统和恢复性司法。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Apr 15;3(5):pgae157. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae157. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Life Cycle Air Pollution, Greenhouse Gas, and Traffic Externality Benefits and Costs of Electrifying Uber and Lyft.电动汽车化对优步和来福的生命周期空气污染、温室气体和交通外部性的效益和成本评估
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Jun 13;57(23):8524-8535. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c07030. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
3
Measuring racial and ethnic disparities in traffic enforcement with large-scale telematics data.
利用大规模远程信息处理数据衡量交通执法中的种族和族裔差异。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Jul 30;1(4):pgac144. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac144. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment.通过动态行程-车辆分配实现按需大容量拼车服务。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 17;114(3):462-467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611675114. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
Inferring Passenger Denial Behavior of Taxi Drivers from Large-Scale Taxi Traces.从大规模出租车轨迹推断出租车司机拒载行为
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0165597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165597. eCollection 2016.