Impact of Either Trendelenburg or Reverse Trendelenburg Positioning for Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE

Urologists encounter multiple challenges in managing ureteral stones with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. This meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of alternative surgical positioning, reverse Trendelenburg (RevTren) and Trendelenburg (Tren), in reducing stone migration and enhancing outcomes compared with standard dorsal lithotomy positioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science up to March 2024. This review focused on studies evaluating RevTren or Tren positioning during ureteroscopic lithotripsy compared with standard dorsal lithotomy, analyzing end points such as stone migration, conversion rates, success rates, complications, and operative time.

RESULTS

Of 137 studies identified, 8 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1374 patients. RevTren significantly reduced ureteral stone migration (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.47), lowered the need for conversion to a flexible ureteroscope (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.67), and improved success rates (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.88-4.48). Tren increased migration of ureteral and calyceal stones toward upper renal calyces (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.48-3.04) and achieved a higher success rate (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.15-5.92). Complications were comparable across all positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusting patient positioning during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy can enhance procedure outcomes. RevTren effectively reduces ureteral stone migration and the necessity for flexible ureteroscopes, whereas Tren facilitates ureteral and calyceal stone migration toward upper calyces, increasing success rates. Both positioning techniques offer significant advantages over standard positioning and can be safely adopted in clinical practice without compromising patient safety.