AutoRSA Research Group, Orthopaedic Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bone Joint J. 2024 Oct 1;106-B(10):1133-1140. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0419.R1.
This study aimed to quantify the shoulder kinematics during an apprehension-relocation test in patients with anterior shoulder instability (ASI) and glenoid bone loss using the radiostereometric analysis (RSA) method. Kinematics were compared with the patient's contralateral healthy shoulder.
A total of 20 patients with ASI and > 10% glenoid bone loss and a healthy contralateral shoulder were included. RSA imaging of the patient's shoulders was performed during a repeated apprehension-relocation test. Bone volume models were generated from CT scans, marked with anatomical coordinate systems, and aligned with the digitally reconstructed bone projections on the RSA images. The glenohumeral joint (GHJ) kinematics were evaluated in the anteroposterior and superoinferior direction of: the humeral head centre location relative to the glenoid centre; and the humeral head contact point location on the glenoid.
During the apprehension test, the centre of the humeral head was 1.0 mm (95% CI 0.0 to 2.0) more inferior on the glenoid for the ASI shoulder compared with the healthy shoulder. Furthermore, the contact point of the ASI shoulder was 1.4 mm (95% CI 0.3 to 2.5) more anterior and 2.0 mm (95% CI 0.8 to 3.1) more inferior on the glenoid compared with the healthy shoulder. The contact point of the ASI shoulder was 1.2 mm (95% CI 0.2 to 2.6) more anterior during the apprehension test compared to the relocation test.
The humeral head centre was located more inferior, and the GHJ contact point was located both more anterior and inferior during the apprehension test for the ASI shoulders than the healthy shoulders. Furthermore, the contact point displacement between the apprehension and relocation test revealed increased joint laxity for the ASI shoulder than the healthy shoulders. These results contribute to existing knowledge that ASI shoulders with glenoid bone loss may also suffer from inferior shoulder instability.
本研究旨在使用放射立体分析法(RSA)量化肩不稳(ASIS)伴盂骨缺损患者在盂肱关节(GHJ)复发性恐惧-复位试验中盂肱关节的运动学变化。将这些运动学变化与患者对侧健康肩部进行比较。
共纳入 20 例 ASIS 伴>10%盂骨缺损患者及对侧健康肩部。对患者的肩部进行 RSA 成像,在反复恐惧-复位试验过程中进行。对 CT 扫描进行骨质体积模型重建,标记解剖坐标系,并与 RSA 图像上的数字重建骨质投影对齐。评估 GHJ 在前后方向和上下方向上的运动学:相对于盂心的肱骨头中心位置;肱骨头在关节盂上的接触点位置。
在恐惧试验中,与健康肩部相比,患侧 ASIS 肩部盂心的肱骨头中心位置更靠下,相差 1.0mm(95%CI 0.0 到 2.0)。此外,患侧 ASIS 肩部的接触点更靠前、更靠下,相差 1.4mm(95%CI 0.3 到 2.5)和 2.0mm(95%CI 0.8 到 3.1)。与复位试验相比,恐惧试验中患侧 ASIS 肩部的接触点更靠前,相差 1.2mm(95%CI 0.2 到 2.6)。
与健康肩部相比,ASIS 伴盂骨缺损患者的盂肱关节中心位置更靠下,GHJ 接触点更靠前、更靠下。此外,恐惧和复位试验之间的接触点位移表明,与健康肩部相比,ASIS 肩部的关节松弛度增加。这些结果有助于我们了解伴盂骨缺损的 ASIS 患者可能也存在下盂肱关节不稳。