Stress-induced overeating behaviors explained from a (transitory) relief-learning perspective.

People use various behaviors to cope with stressful events. These behaviors are mostly adaptive, as they allow a successful release of stress without impacting other aspects of life: How nice is it to have a break with a few spoons of that favorite ice cream during a hectic working day? However, when excessive consumption of high-sugar/salt ultra-processed food becomes the gateway to find relief from stress, eating loses this adaptive function and may escalate to binge eating, lead to obesity, and other medical conditions linked to overweight. Several etiological models attempt to explain stress-induced eating and excessive overeating behaviors characterizing these clinical conditions. The popular Emotional Eating Theory proposes that stress-related (over-)eating, a major predictor of obesity and diagnosed binge eating disorders, develops based on negative reinforcement learning since food consumption regulates the negative affective state associated with stressful circumstances. Differently, the prominent Incentive Sensitization Theory explains overeating, binge eating disorders (including bulimia), and obesity in terms of excessive amplification of reward 'wanting', which is thought to emerge from overexposure to obesogenic (food)cues. The several studies oriented by these theories have paved the way to better understand stress-related (over-)eating and its clinical excesses. However, a deep mechanistic understanding of how and why stress-induced (over-)eating can escalate till clinical forms of overeating remain elusive. A well-funded connection of the mechanisms proposed by the Emotional Eating Theory and the Incentive Sensitization Theory might address this etiological open question. To avoid erroneous arguments, it is however essential to first address the internal theoretical and methodological shortcomings of each theory and connected studies. These shortcomings stem from conceptual fallacies and poorly implemented designs, which might partially explain the 'high variability and low replicability' problem of empirical findings. Next, the formulation of a new integrative model could provide fresh insight into the deep learning and biological mechanisms of this escalation. A successful formalization of this model could then create the much-needed impact in clinical and preventive research since excessive overeating is a behavior hard to change once established. In this opinion paper, I propose to apply recent insights we gathered on the role of relief from the field of safety learning to stress (over-)eating. I will present a new relief-based model that, as a starting point, has the potential to connect the Emotional Eating Theory with the Incentive Sensitization Theory, setting the base for more integrative science.