Hattab Zaid, Moler-Zapata Silvia, Doherty Edel, Sadique Zia, Ramnarayan Padmanabhan, O'Neill Stephen
Discipline of Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; Department of Mathematics, An-Najah National University, Nablus, State of Palestine.
Department of Mathematics, An-Najah National University, Nablus, State of Palestine; Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK.
Value Health. 2025 Jan;28(1):60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
To investigate heterogeneity in the cost-effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acutely ill children requiring noninvasive respiratory support.
Using data from the First-line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children trial, we explore heterogeneity at the patient and subgroup levels using 2 causal forest approaches and a seemingly unrelated regression approach for comparison. First-line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN60048867) involving 24 UK pediatric intensive care units. The Step-up trial focuses on acutely ill children aged 0 to 15 years, requiring noninvasive respiratory support. A total of 600 children were randomly assigned to HFNC and CPAP groups in a 1:1 allocation ratio, with 94 patients excluded because of data unavailability.
The primary outcome is the incremental net monetary benefit (INB) of HFNC compared with CPAP, using a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life year gain. INB is derived from total costs and quality-adjusted life years at 6 months. Subgroup analysis showed that some subgroups, such as male children, those aged less than 12 months, and those without severe respiratory distress at randomization, had more favorable INB results. Patient-level analysis revealed heterogeneity in INB estimates, particularly driven by the cost component, with greater uncertainty for those with higher INBs.
The estimated overall INB of HFNC is significantly larger for specific patient subgroups, suggesting that the cost-effectiveness of HFNC can be heterogeneous, which highlights the importance of considering patient characteristics in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of HFNC.
探讨对于需要无创呼吸支持的急性病患儿,高流量鼻导管(HFNC)治疗与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)相比在成本效益方面的异质性。
利用儿童呼吸支持一线治疗试验的数据,我们采用两种因果森林方法和一种看似不相关回归方法在患者和亚组层面探索异质性以进行比较。儿童呼吸支持一线治疗试验是一项非劣效性随机对照试验(ISRCTN60048867),涉及英国24个儿科重症监护病房。逐步升级试验聚焦于0至15岁需要无创呼吸支持的急性病患儿。总共600名儿童以1:1的分配比例随机分配至HFNC组和CPAP组,94名患者因数据不可用被排除。
主要结局是HFNC与CPAP相比的增量净货币效益(INB),采用每获得一个质量调整生命年支付意愿阈值为20000英镑。INB来自6个月时的总成本和质量调整生命年。亚组分析表明,一些亚组,如男性儿童、年龄小于12个月的儿童以及随机分组时无严重呼吸窘迫的儿童,具有更有利的INB结果。患者层面分析揭示了INB估计值的异质性,特别是由成本部分驱动,INB较高者不确定性更大。
对于特定患者亚组,HFNC估计的总体INB显著更大,这表明HFNC的成本效益可能存在异质性,这突出了在评估HFNC成本效益时考虑患者特征的重要性。