Suppr超能文献

对预后良好的患者进行非整倍体植入前基因检测的成功率取决于年龄。

Success rates with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in good prognosis patients are dependent on age.

作者信息

Harris Benjamin S, Acharya Kelly S, Unnithan Shakthi, Neal Shelby A, Mebane Sloane, Truong Tracy, Muasher Suheil J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Duke University Health System, Morrisville, North Carolina; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shady Grove Fertility - Jones Institute, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Duke University Health System, Morrisville, North Carolina.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2025 Mar;123(3):428-438. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.09.043. Epub 2024 Sep 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cumulative live birth after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with next generation sequencing (NGS) compared with morphology alone among patients aged 21-40 years undergoing single blastocyst transfer.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Patients aged 21-40 years undergoing first autologous retrieval cycles resulting in ≥5 fertilized oocytes, with subsequent single blastocyst transfer in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics from 2016-2019.

EXPOSURE

PGT-A using NGS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was cumulative live birth per retrieval. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth per transfer.

RESULTS

A total of 56,469 retrieval cycles were included in the analysis. Retrieval cycles were stratified based on age (<35, 35-37, and 38-40 years) and exposure to PGT-A with NGS. Modified Poisson regression modeling was used to evaluate the association between PGT-A and cumulative live birth per retrieval while controlling for covariates. In this cohort, most cycles did not use PGT-A (n = 49,608; 88%). After adjusting for covariates, the use of PGT-A was associated with a slightly lower cumulative live birth in individuals aged <35 years (risk ratio [RR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99) compared with no PGT, but higher cumulative live birth in ages 35-37 years (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00-1.08), and 38-40 years (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.07-1.20). A subgroup analysis limited to freeze-all cycles (n = 29,041) showed that PGT-A was associated with higher cumulative live birth in individuals aged ≥35 years and was similar to no PGT in individuals aged <35 years. Miscarriage was significantly less likely in individuals aged ≥35 years using PGT-A compared with no PGT-A.

CONCLUSION

In this large national database study, success rates in cycles using PGT-A were dependent on age. Cumulative live birth was observed to be significantly less likely in PGT-A cycles among individuals aged <35 years and more likely among individuals aged 38-40 years, compared with no PGT-A. In individuals with no fresh transfer, results were similar. Moreover, miscarriage was significantly less likely with PGT-A among individuals aged 35-40 years in a subgroup analysis of freeze-all cycles.

摘要

目的

评估在接受单囊胚移植的21至40岁患者中,与单纯形态学评估相比,采用下一代测序(NGS)进行非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)后的累积活产情况。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

研究对象

年龄在21至40岁之间,进行首次自体取卵周期且产生≥5个受精卵,随后于2016年至2019年在辅助生殖技术协会诊所进行单囊胚移植的患者。

暴露因素

使用NGS进行PGT-A。

主要结局指标

主要结局为每次取卵后的累积活产。次要结局包括临床妊娠、流产以及每次移植后的活产。

结果

分析共纳入56469个取卵周期。取卵周期根据年龄(<35岁、35至37岁和38至40岁)以及是否接受使用NGS的PGT-A进行分层。采用修正泊松回归模型评估PGT-A与每次取卵后的累积活产之间的关联,同时控制协变量。在该队列中,大多数周期未使用PGT-A(n = 49608;88%)。调整协变量后,与未使用PGT-A相比,<35岁的个体使用PGT-A后的累积活产略低(风险比[RR]:0.96;95%置信区间[CI]:0.93 - 0.99),但35至37岁(RR:1.04;95% CI:1.00 - 1.08)和38至40岁(RR:1.14;95% CI:1.07 - 1.20)的个体累积活产较高。一项仅限于全冷冻周期(n = 29041)的亚组分析显示,PGT-A与≥35岁个体的较高累积活产相关,而与<35岁个体未使用PGT-A时的情况相似。与未使用PGT-A相比,≥35岁使用PGT-A的个体流产可能性显著降低。

结论

在这项大型全国性数据库研究中,使用PGT-A的周期成功率取决于年龄。与未使用PGT-A相比,<35岁个体的PGT-A周期中累积活产显著降低,而38至40岁个体的累积活产更有可能。在没有新鲜移植的个体中,结果相似。此外,在全冷冻周期的亚组分析中,35至40岁个体使用PGT-A时流产可能性显著降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验