Shaw Jaime, Pundole Xerxes, Balasubramanian Akhila, Anderson Erik S, Pastel Malaika, Bebb D Gwyn, Jiang Tony, Martinez Pablo, Ramalingam Suresh S, Borghaei Hossein
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, United States.
Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Oncologist. 2024 Dec 6;29(12):1079-1089. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae234.
The landscape of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has changed since the 2019 and 2020 approvals of anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab and durvalumab for first-line (1L) treatment in combination with chemotherapy. We studied treatment patterns and real-world overall survival (rwOS) following 1L-3L therapy.
A nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database was used to describe treatment patterns, characteristics, and survival of patients with extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC by 1L anti-PD-L1 treatment. Patients with ES-SCLC who initiated ≥1 line of systemic therapy from 2013 to 2021, with potential follow-up through 2022, were included.
Among 9952 patients with SCLC, there were 4308 patients with ES-SCLC treated during the study period who met eligibility criteria. Etoposide + platinum (EP) chemotherapy was most common in the 1L, with addition of anti-PD-L1 therapy to most regimens by 2019. Second-line regimens varied by platinum sensitivity status and shifted from topotecan to lurbinectedin over time. Median rwOS following 1L therapy was 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-8.8) in those treated with 1L anti-PD-L1 and 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.8-8.2) in those who were not. Following 2L and 3L, median rwOS was 5.6 (95% CI, 4.9-6.3) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.0), respectively, among 1L anti-PD-L1-treated, and 4.5 (95% CI, 4.2-4.9) and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-4.5), respectively, among those who were not.
Despite the introduction of frontline anti-PD-L1 therapy, survival remains dismal among patients with ES-SCLC treated in the real-world setting.
自2019年和2020年抗程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)阿替利珠单抗和度伐利尤单抗获批与化疗联合用于一线治疗以来,小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的格局发生了变化。我们研究了一线至三线治疗后的治疗模式和真实世界总生存期(rwOS)。
使用一个全国性的源自电子健康记录(EHR)的去识别数据库,按一线抗PD-L1治疗描述广泛期(ES)-SCLC患者的治疗模式、特征和生存期。纳入2013年至2021年开始接受≥1线全身治疗且可能随访至2022年的ES-SCLC患者。
在9952例SCLC患者中,有4308例在研究期间接受治疗的ES-SCLC患者符合纳入标准。依托泊苷+铂类(EP)化疗在一线治疗中最为常见,到2019年大多数方案中添加了抗PD-L1治疗。二线方案因铂类敏感性状态而异,且随着时间推移从拓扑替康转向鲁比卡丁。接受一线抗PD-L1治疗的患者一线治疗后的中位rwOS为8.3个月(95%CI,7.9 - 8.8),未接受一线抗PD-L1治疗的患者为8.0个月(95%CI,7.8 - 8.2)。在接受一线抗PD-L1治疗的患者中,二线和三线治疗后的中位rwOS分别为5.6个月(95%CI,4.9 - 6.3)和4.9个月(95%CI,3.4 - 6.0),未接受一线抗PD-L1治疗的患者分别为4.5个月(95%CI,4.2 - 4.9)和4.0个月(95%CI,3.7 - 4.5)。
尽管引入了一线抗PD-L1治疗,但在真实世界环境中接受治疗的ES-SCLC患者的生存期仍然很差。