Frishman W H, Charlap S, Goldberger J, Kimmel B, Stroh J, Dorsa F, Allen L, Strom J
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Dec 6;56(16):41H-46H. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90542-9.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, diltiazem and nifedipine were compared in 10 patients with stable angina pectoris and mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg). Patients received placebo for 2 weeks, then increasing doses of diltiazem (90 to 360 mg/day) or nifedipine (30 to 120 mg/day) in 3 daily divided doses over 2 weeks, followed by 1 week of therapy at the maximal dose, a 1-week placebo "washout," then crossover to the other drug. Heart rate and blood pressure at rest and during exercise, anginal frequency, nitroglycerin consumption and treadmill exercise tolerance were assessed. Compared with placebo, anginal frequency and nitroglycerin consumption were reduced with both diltiazem and nifedipine (p less than 0.01) and exercise tolerance was increased with both drugs (p less than 0.01). Standing blood pressure at rest was reduced by diltiazem and nifedipine (146.6 +/- 11.4/97.7 +/- 5.3 mm Hg at placebo, baseline reduced to 129.6 +/- 15.2/79.5 +/- 13.7 mm Hg with diltiazem, and to 122.2 +/- 9.9/82.0 +/- 7.1 with nifedipine, p less than 0.01 for both). Compared with placebo, diltiazem and nifedipine also reduced exercise diastolic blood pressure (p less than 0.01), but not systolic blood pressure. Diltiazem lowered the heart rate at rest from 88.5 +/- 14.4 beats/min at placebo baseline to 79.7 +/- 17.9 beats/min (p less than 0.01); the heart rate with diltiazem was 11 beats/min lower than that with nifedipine (p less than 0.05). Both diltiazem and nifedipine had similar effects on the heart rate-blood pressure product at rest and during exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉试验中,对10例稳定型心绞痛合并轻至中度高血压(仰卧位舒张压大于或等于90mmHg)患者比较了地尔硫䓬和硝苯地平的疗效。患者先接受2周安慰剂治疗,然后在2周内分3次每日递增剂量给予地尔硫䓬(90至360mg/天)或硝苯地平(30至120mg/天),接着以最大剂量治疗1周,再经过1周的安慰剂“洗脱期”,然后交叉换用另一种药物。评估了静息及运动时的心率、血压、心绞痛发作频率、硝酸甘油用量及平板运动耐量。与安慰剂相比,地尔硫䓬和硝苯地平均使心绞痛发作频率和硝酸甘油用量减少(p<0.01),且两种药物均增加了运动耐量(p<0.01)。地尔硫䓬和硝苯地平均降低了静息时的站立血压(安慰剂时为146.6±11.4/97.7±5.3mmHg,基线值降至地尔硫䓬治疗时的129.6±15.2/79.5±13.7mmHg,硝苯地平治疗时为122.2±9.9/82.0±7.1mmHg,两者p均<0.01)。与安慰剂相比,地尔硫䓬和硝苯地平还降低了运动时的舒张压(p<0.01),但未降低收缩压。地尔硫䓬使静息心率从安慰剂基线时的88.5±14.4次/分降至79.7±17.9次/分(p<0.01);地尔硫䓬时的心率比硝苯地平低11次/分(p<0.05)。地尔硫䓬和硝苯地平对静息及运动时的心率-血压乘积有相似影响。(摘要截短于250字)