Suppr超能文献

原发性系统性淀粉样变性。美法仑/泼尼松与秋水仙碱的比较。

Primary systemic amyloidosis. Comparison of melphalan/prednisone versus colchicine.

作者信息

Kyle R A, Greipp P R, Garton J P, Gertz M A

出版信息

Am J Med. 1985 Dec;79(6):708-16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90521-2.

Abstract

This is the first prospectively randomized study of the use of melphalan/prednisone and colchicine in the treatment of primary systemic amyloidosis. One hundred one patients were stratified according to their dominant clinical manifestation. Forty-nine patients initially received melphalan/prednisone and eight subsequently had colchicine added to their regimen. Fifty-two patients initially received colchicine and 35 subsequently required melphalan/prednisone because of progressive disease. There was no difference in survival when the two groups were analyzed in aggregate (melphalan/prednisone, 25.2 months versus colchicine, 18 months; p = 0.23). When the survival of patients receiving only one regimen was analyzed or when survival was analyzed from the time of entry into the study to the time of death or progression of disease, significant differences (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.0001, respectively) were evident, favoring melphalan/prednisone. This study suggests that melphalan/prednisone is superior to colchicine in the treatment of primary amyloidosis, but to confirm this impression, a study without a crossover group is necessary.

摘要

这是第一项关于美法仑/泼尼松与秋水仙碱用于治疗原发性系统性淀粉样变性的前瞻性随机研究。101名患者根据其主要临床表现进行分层。49名患者最初接受美法仑/泼尼松治疗,其中8名随后在治疗方案中加用了秋水仙碱。52名患者最初接受秋水仙碱治疗,35名因疾病进展随后需要接受美法仑/泼尼松治疗。对两组进行总体分析时,生存率无差异(美法仑/泼尼松组为25.2个月,秋水仙碱组为18个月;p = 0.23)。当分析仅接受一种治疗方案患者的生存率时,或从进入研究到死亡或疾病进展的时间分析生存率时,有显著差异(分别为p < 0.001和p < 0.0001),支持美法仑/泼尼松治疗。该研究表明,在原发性淀粉样变性的治疗中,美法仑/泼尼松优于秋水仙碱,但要证实这一观点,需要进行一项无交叉组的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验