Nakazawa Yujiro, Okada Masahiro, Tago Kenichiro, Kuwabara Naoki, Mizuno Mariko, Abe Hayato, Higaki Tokio, Okamura Yukiyasu, Takayama Tadatoshi
Departments of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Departments of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar;35(3):1464-1472. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11086-8. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
To evaluate the accuracy of combined imaging and blood test indices related to liver fibrosis (LF) compared to magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for estimating severe LF (F3-4) in preoperative patients.
This retrospective study included patients who underwent MRE, gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI, and dynamic CT before liver resection. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using MRE, liver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (LSR) using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, and spleen volume normalized to body surface area (SV/BSA) using CT volumetry were measured. Laboratory parameters, including levels of type IV collagen 7S and hyaluronic acid, were also measured. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify parameters that could estimate severe LF more accurately than LSM alone.
A total of 81 patients (mean age, 67 years ± 9.9 [SD]; 58 men) were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that LSR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.37, p < 0.001), SV/BSA (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.52, p = 0.03) and type IV collagen 7S (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.12-3.00, p = 0.02) were associated with severe LF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that for estimating severe LF, the area under the curve was significantly larger for the combination of LSR, SV/BSA, and type IV collagen 7S than for LSM alone (0.95 vs 0.85, p = 0.04).
The combined evaluation of LSR, SV/BSA, and type IV collagen 7S obtained by clinically common preoperative examinations was more accurate than MRE alone for estimating severe LF in preoperative patients.
Question What indicators among the imaging and blood tests commonly performed preoperatively can provide a more accurate estimate of severe LF compared to MRE? Findings The combination of LSR, SV/BSA, and type IV collagen 7S was more accurate than an LSM alone for estimating severe LF. Clinical relevance A combination of commonly performed non-invasive preoperative tests provides a more accurate estimation of severe LF than MR elastography, an examination with relatively limited.
与磁共振弹性成像(MRE)相比,评估联合成像和血液检测指标与肝纤维化(LF)的相关性,以估计术前患者的严重LF(F3 - 4)。
这项回顾性研究纳入了在肝切除术前接受MRE、钆乙氧基苄基二乙三胺五乙酸(Gd - EOB - DTPA)增强MRI和动态CT检查的患者。测量了使用MRE的肝脏硬度测量值(LSM)、使用Gd - EOB - DTPA增强MRI的肝脾信号强度比(LSR)以及使用CT容积测量法的脾体积与体表面积之比(SV/BSA)。还测量了实验室参数,包括IV型胶原7S和透明质酸水平。进行逻辑回归和受试者操作特征分析,以确定比单独使用LSM能更准确估计严重LF的参数。
共纳入81例患者(平均年龄67岁±9.9[标准差];58例男性)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,LSR(比值比[OR]:0.14,95%置信区间[CI]:0.05 - 0.37,p < 0.001)、SV/BSA(OR:1.25,95% CI:1.02 - 1.52,p = 0.03)和IV型胶原7S(OR:1.84,95% CI:1.12 - 3.00,p = 0.02)与严重LF相关。受试者操作特征分析表明,对于估计严重LF,LSR、SV/BSA和IV型胶原7S联合使用时曲线下面积显著大于单独使用LSM(0.95对0.85,p = 0.04)。
通过临床常见的术前检查获得的LSR、SV/BSA和IV型胶原7S联合评估在估计术前患者严重LF方面比单独使用MRE更准确。
问题 与MRE相比,术前常用的成像和血液检测中的哪些指标能更准确地估计严重LF? 发现 LSR、SV/BSA和IV型胶原7S联合使用在估计严重LF方面比单独使用LSM更准确。 临床意义 常用的非侵入性术前检查联合使用比磁共振弹性成像能更准确地估计严重LF,而磁共振弹性成像检查相对受限。