Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, 6th of October, 12563, Egypt.
Department of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, 6th of October, 12563, Egypt.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1162. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04746-0.
Bulk-fill resin composites may suffer from recurrent caries around compound proximal restorations in posterior teeth, especially at the proximo-gingival interface.Over 12 months, will the bulk fill technique affect the caries recurrence rate at gingival margins when compared to the conventional incremental packing technique? How early will the first clinical, radiographical, and biochemical evidence of caries recurrence occur?
After randomization, in 30 patients with two compound (OM or OD) supragingival lesions, one tooth was restored using the bulk fill technique on one side (group 1) (n = 15). In contrast, the other tooth on the other side was restored utilizing the incremental layering technique (group 2) (n = 15). Both teeth received restorative material (X-tra fil, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany). The FDI criteria were used to evaluate restorations. As for the periodontal assessment, the gingival index, plaque index, papillary bleeding scoring index and periodontal pocket depth were evaluated. The gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) specimens were gathered, and MMP-9 was extracted and quantitated by ELISA. A customized radiographic template was designed, and 3D printed digital bitewing radiographs were taken. Assessments were done clinically, radiographically and biochemically at baseline (1 week) and after 3, 6 and 12 months. Data was statistically analyzed.
The null hypothesis was accepted clinically; no statistically significant differences appeared between bulk and incrementally filled posterior restorations. As for the radiographic assessment, the null hypothesis was accepted except for increased periodontal ligament width at 3 months. The null hypothesis for the biochemical evaluation was rejected as there were significant changes in levels of MMP-9 at different testing times.
An ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, (Approval No. RECO6U/5-2022). The study was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry on 24/07/2023 with an identification number (PACTR202307573531455).
在后牙复合近中修复体周围,大体积充填树脂复合材料可能会出现复发性龋,尤其是在近龈缘界面。在 12 个月的时间里,与传统的增量堆积技术相比,大体积充填技术会影响龈缘的龋复发率吗?最早会在何时出现龋复发的临床、放射学和生化证据?
在随机分组后,30 名患者的两个复合(OM 或 OD)龈上病变中,一侧牙齿使用大体积充填技术修复(组 1)(n=15)。相比之下,另一侧的牙齿使用增量分层技术修复(组 2)(n=15)。所有牙齿均使用 X-tra fil(Voco,Cuxhaven,德国)进行修复。采用 FDI 标准评估修复体。牙周评估包括牙龈指数、菌斑指数、乳头出血评分指数和牙周袋深度。收集龈沟液(GCF)标本,通过 ELISA 提取并定量 MMP-9。设计了定制的放射模板,并使用 3D 打印数字咬翼片进行放射检查。基线(1 周)和 3、6 和 12 个月时进行临床、放射学和生物化学评估。数据进行了统计学分析。
临床方面,零假设被接受;大体积和增量充填的后牙修复体之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在放射学评估方面,除了 3 个月时牙周韧带宽度增加外,零假设被接受。生化评估的零假设被拒绝,因为 MMP-9 水平在不同的测试时间有显著变化。
奥波多大学牙科学院伦理委员会于 2022 年 10 月 6 日批准(批准号:RECO6U/5-2022)。该研究于 2023 年 7 月 24 日在泛非临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为(PACTR202307573531455)。